Literature DB >> 18757376

Adoption of laparoscopic colectomy: results and implications of ASCRS hands-on course participation.

Howard M Ross1, Clifford L Simmang, James W Fleshman, Peter W Marcello.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Beginning in 2003, the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons has annually sponsored a laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery instructional course using a cadaver model. This study reports the adoption rate and postcourse practice patterns of participants.
METHODS: All prior participants of hands-on courses from 2003 to 2005 were asked to participate in a 25-question survey. Questions probed practice setting, prior laparoscopic experience, motivation for course participation, time to, indication for, and type of first laparoscopic colectomy, experience prior to cancer resection, factors facilitating skill acquisition, and impact on practice from course completion.
RESULTS: A total of 43 of 63 participants completed the survey and 53% had performed at least 1 laparoscopic colon resection prior to the course. A laparoscopic colon resection was performed within 1 week of the course by 52% of participants and within 1 month by 90%. Laparoscopic colectomy was performed frequently postcourse with 42% performing between 1 and 5 laparoscopic colectomies/month and 42% between 5 and 10. Hand-assisted technologies lowered the threshold for performance of first laparoscopic colectomy for 62% of participants. Cancer resection was the first procedure for 31% and 36% performed between 5 and 10 colectomies prior to cancer resection. Most important factor in particular course selection was a cadaver model (77%). A majority of the participants would require course completion prior to granting hospital privileges (73%) and would recommend the course to other surgeons (97%).
CONCLUSIONS: Cadaver course completion enables rapid integration of laparoscopic colon resection into clinical practice. Experience prior to laparoscopic resection of cancer is modest. Hand-assisted technologies promote technique acquisition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18757376     DOI: 10.1177/1553350608322100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Innov        ISSN: 1553-3506            Impact factor:   2.058


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of fresh-frozen cadaver and high-fidelity virtual reality simulator as methods of laparoscopic training.

Authors:  Mitesh Sharma; Alan Horgan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Analysis of laboratory-based laparoscopic colorectal surgery workshops within the English National Training Programme.

Authors:  Susannah M Wyles; Danilo Miskovic; Zhifang Ni; Austin G Acheson; Charles Maxwell-Armstrong; Robert Longman; Tom Cecil; Mark G Coleman; Alan F Horgan; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-11-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Controversy of hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Abdul-Wahed Nasir Meshikhes
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Need for simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery training.

Authors:  Valerio Celentano
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-27

5.  MIS in the management of colon and rectal cancer: consensus meeting of the Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada.

Authors:  Christopher M Schlachta; Shady Ashamalla; Andy Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Impact of AITS laparoscopic training center on surgeons' preference for appendectomy.

Authors:  Hung-Wen Lai; Shih-Horng Tseng; Yueh-Tsung Lee; Chih-Hung Hsu; Dev-Aur Chou; Hurng-Sheng Wu; Min-Ho Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopy for colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Govind Nandakumar; James W Fleshman
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-02

Review 8.  Working with industry: what is the conflict?

Authors:  Peter W Marcello
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-03

9.  With widespread adoption of MIS colectomy for colon cancer, does hospital type matter?

Authors:  K Freischlag; M Adam; M Turner; J Watson; B Ezekian; P M Schroder; C Mantyh; J Migaly
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Gaitanidis; C Simopoulos; M Pitiakoudis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.