Literature DB >> 33712963

Innovations in Urologic Surgical Training.

Runzhuo Ma1, Sharath Reddy1, Erik B Vanstrum1, Andrew J Hung2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to summarize innovations in urologic surgical training in the past 5 years. RECENT
FINDINGS: Many assessment tools have been developed to objectively evaluate surgical skills and provide structured feedback to urologic trainees. A variety of simulation modalities (i.e., virtual/augmented reality, dry-lab, animal, and cadaver) have been utilized to facilitate the acquisition of surgical skills outside the high-stakes operating room environment. Three-dimensional printing has been used to create high-fidelity, immersive dry-lab models at a reasonable cost. Non-technical skills such as teamwork and decision-making have gained more attention. Structured surgical video review has been shown to improve surgical skills not only for trainees but also for qualified surgeons. Research and development in urologic surgical training has been active in the past 5 years. Despite these advances, there is still an unfulfilled need for a standardized surgical training program covering both technical and non-technical skills.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Robotic surgery; Simulation; Surgical education; Surgical training; Urology

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33712963      PMCID: PMC8106917          DOI: 10.1007/s11934-021-01043-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  94 in total

1.  Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skills for Validation of Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Skills Tasks.

Authors:  Timothy M Kowalewski; Bryan Comstock; Robert Sweet; Cory Schaffhausen; Ashleigh Menhadji; Timothy Averch; Geoffrey Box; Timothy Brand; Michael Ferrandino; Jihad Kaouk; Bodo Knudsen; Jaime Landman; Benjamin Lee; Bradley F Schwartz; Elspeth McDougall; Thomas S Lendvay
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Experts vs super-experts: differences in automated performance metrics and clinical outcomes for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Hung; Paul J Oh; Jian Chen; Saum Ghodoussipour; Christianne Lane; Anthony Jarc; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-11-18       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  A computer vision technique for automated assessment of surgical performance using surgeons' console-feed videos.

Authors:  Amir Baghdadi; Ahmed A Hussein; Youssef Ahmed; Lora A Cavuoto; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  The Importance of Technical and Non-technical Skills in Robotic Surgery Training.

Authors:  Justin William Collins; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Andrew J Hung; Nicholas R Brook
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2018-09-11

Review 5.  A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Simulators for Robot-assisted Surgery.

Authors:  Andrea Moglia; Vincenzo Ferrari; Luca Morelli; Mauro Ferrari; Franco Mosca; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Development and Validation of Objective Performance Metrics for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Andrew J Hung; Jian Chen; Anthony Jarc; David Hatcher; Hooman Djaladat; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Design, implementation, and evaluation of a novel curriculum to teach transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): a 3-year experience of urology simulation bootcamp course.

Authors:  Mithun Kailavasan; Christopher Berridge; Grigorios Athanasiadis; Agapios Gkentzis; Bhavan Rai; Sunjay Jain; Chandra S Biyani; Ghulam Nabi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Are basic robotic surgical skills transferable from the simulator to the operating room? A randomized, prospective, educational study.

Authors:  Ahmad Almarzouq; Jason Hu; Yasser A Noureldin; Anne Yin; Maurice Anidjar; Franck Bladou; Simon Tanguay; Wassim Kassouf; Armen G Aprikian; Sero Andonian
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Serving as a bedside surgeon before performing robotic radical prostatectomy improves surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Haci Ibrahim Cimen; Yavuz Tarik Atik; Deniz Gul; Burak Uysal; Mevlana Derya Balbay
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

10.  Development and validation of a tool for non-technical skills evaluation in robotic surgery-the ICARS system.

Authors:  Nicholas Raison; Thomas Wood; Oliver Brunckhorst; Takashige Abe; Talisa Ross; Ben Challacombe; Mohammed Shamim Khan; Giacomo Novara; Nicolo Buffi; Henk Van Der Poel; Craig McIlhenny; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.