| Literature DB >> 31662082 |
Brock Bastian1, Christin-Melanie Vauclair2, Steve Loughnan3, Paul Bain4, Ashwini Ashokkumar5, Maja Becker6, Michał Bilewicz7, Emma Collier-Baker8,9, Carla Crespo10, Paul W Eastwick11, Ronald Fischer12, Malte Friese13, Ángel Gómez14, Valeschka M Guerra15, José Luis Castellanos Guevara16, Katja Hanke17, Nic Hooper18, Li-Li Huang19, Shi Junqi20, Minoru Karasawa21, Peter Kuppens22, Siri Leknes23, Müjde Peker24, Cesar Pelay25, Afroditi Pina26, Marianna Sachkova27, Tamar Saguy28, Mia Silfver-Kuhalampi29, Florencia Sortheix30, Jennifer Tong31, Victoria Wai-Lan Yeung32, Jacob Duffy1, William B Swann5.
Abstract
Pathogens represent a significant threat to human health leading to the emergence of strategies designed to help manage their negative impact. We examined how spiritual beliefs developed to explain and predict the devastating effects of pathogens and spread of infectious disease. Analysis of existing data in studies 1 and 2 suggests that moral vitalism (beliefs about spiritual forces of evil) is higher in geographical regions characterized by historical higher levels of pathogens. Furthermore, drawing on a sample of 3140 participants from 28 countries in study 3, we found that historical higher levels of pathogens were associated with stronger endorsement of moral vitalistic beliefs. Furthermore, endorsement of moral vitalistic beliefs statistically mediated the previously reported relationship between pathogen prevalence and conservative ideologies, suggesting these beliefs reinforce behavioural strategies which function to prevent infection. We conclude that moral vitalism may be adaptive: by emphasizing concerns over contagion, it provided an explanatory model that enabled human groups to reduce rates of contagious disease.Entities:
Keywords: disease; morality; pathogens; spiritual belief; vitalism
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31662082 PMCID: PMC6842846 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1576
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Biol Sci ISSN: 0962-8452 Impact factor: 5.349