Literature DB >> 10976599

Vitalism in naive biological thinking.

Suzanne C Morris1, John E Taplin, Susan A Gelman.   

Abstract

Vitalism is the belief that internal bodily organs have agency and that they transmit or exchange a vital force or energy. Three experiments investigated the use of vitalistic explanations for biological phenomena by 5- and 10-year-old English-speaking children and adults, focusing on 2 components: the notion that bodily organs have intentions and the notion that some life force or energy is transmitted. The original Japanese finding of vitalistic thinking was replicated in Experiment 1 with English-speaking 5-year-olds. Experiment 2 indicated that the more active component of vitalism for these children is a belief in the transfer of energy during biological processes, and Experiment 3 suggested an additional, albeit lesser, role for organ intentionality. A belief in vital energy may serve a causal placeholder function within a naive theory of biology until a more precisely formulated mechanism is known.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10976599     DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.36.5.582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  7 in total

1.  Young infants have biological expectations about animals.

Authors:  Peipei Setoh; Di Wu; Renée Baillargeon; Rochel Gelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Developmental Origins of Biological Explanations: The case of infants' internal property bias.

Authors:  Hernando Taborda-Osorio; Erik W Cheries
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-10

3.  Young infants' reasoning about physical events involving inert and self-propelled objects.

Authors:  Yuyan Luo; Lisa Kaufman; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Explaining illness with evil: pathogen prevalence fosters moral vitalism.

Authors:  Brock Bastian; Christin-Melanie Vauclair; Steve Loughnan; Paul Bain; Ashwini Ashokkumar; Maja Becker; Michał Bilewicz; Emma Collier-Baker; Carla Crespo; Paul W Eastwick; Ronald Fischer; Malte Friese; Ángel Gómez; Valeschka M Guerra; José Luis Castellanos Guevara; Katja Hanke; Nic Hooper; Li-Li Huang; Shi Junqi; Minoru Karasawa; Peter Kuppens; Siri Leknes; Müjde Peker; Cesar Pelay; Afroditi Pina; Marianna Sachkova; Tamar Saguy; Mia Silfver-Kuhalampi; Florencia Sortheix; Jennifer Tong; Victoria Wai-Lan Yeung; Jacob Duffy; William B Swann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Relations between intuitive biological thinking and biological misconceptions in biology majors and nonmajors.

Authors:  John D Coley; Kimberly Tanner
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Children's Mental Models of Prenatal Development.

Authors:  Tessa J P van Schijndel; Sara E van Es; Rooske K Franse; Bianca M C W van Bers; Maartje E J Raijmakers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-01

7.  Causal illusions in children when the outcome is frequent.

Authors:  María Manuela Moreno-Fernández; Fernando Blanco; Helena Matute
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.