Literature DB >> 20142481

The Lucretian swerve: the biological basis of human behavior and the criminal justice system.

Anthony R Cashmore1.   

Abstract

It is widely believed, at least in scientific circles, that living systems, including mankind, obey the natural physical laws. However, it is also commonly accepted that man has the capacity to make "free" conscious decisions that do not simply reflect the chemical makeup of the individual at the time of decision--this chemical makeup reflecting both the genetic and environmental history and a degree of stochasticism. Whereas philosophers have discussed for centuries the apparent lack of a causal component for free will, many biologists still seem to be remarkably at ease with this notion of free will; and furthermore, our judicial system is based on such a belief. It is the author's contention that a belief in free will is nothing other than a continuing belief in vitalism--something biologists proudly believe they discarded well over 100 years ago.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20142481      PMCID: PMC2842067          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0915161107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  7 in total

1.  A theory of everything?

Authors:  Gerard 't Hooft; Leonard Susskind; Edward Witten; Masataka Fukugita; Lisa Randall; Lee Smolin; John Stachel; Carlo Rovelli; George Ellis; Steven Weinberg; Roger Penrose
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The non-problem of free will in forensic psychiatry and psychology.

Authors:  Stephen J Morse
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2007

3.  Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain.

Authors:  Chun Siong Soon; Marcel Brass; Hans-Jochen Heinze; John-Dylan Haynes
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-13       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Time's up: bursting out of transcription.

Authors:  Ethan Ford; Dimitris Thanos
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything.

Authors:  Joshua Greene; Jonathan Cohen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act.

Authors:  B Libet; C A Gleason; E W Wright; D K Pearl
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Structure and development of neuronal connections in isogenic organisms: variations and similarities in the optic system of Daphnia magna.

Authors:  E R Macagno; V Lopresti; C Levinthal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 11.205

  7 in total
  14 in total

1.  A scientific model for free will is impossible.

Authors:  Konrad Hinsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A justice system that denies free will is not based on justice.

Authors:  James P McEvoy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Has biology disproved free will and moral responsibility?

Authors:  Henrik Anckarsäter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Profile of Anthony R. Cashmore. Interview by Prashant Nair.

Authors:  Anthony R Cashmore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Explaining illness with evil: pathogen prevalence fosters moral vitalism.

Authors:  Brock Bastian; Christin-Melanie Vauclair; Steve Loughnan; Paul Bain; Ashwini Ashokkumar; Maja Becker; Michał Bilewicz; Emma Collier-Baker; Carla Crespo; Paul W Eastwick; Ronald Fischer; Malte Friese; Ángel Gómez; Valeschka M Guerra; José Luis Castellanos Guevara; Katja Hanke; Nic Hooper; Li-Li Huang; Shi Junqi; Minoru Karasawa; Peter Kuppens; Siri Leknes; Müjde Peker; Cesar Pelay; Afroditi Pina; Marianna Sachkova; Tamar Saguy; Mia Silfver-Kuhalampi; Florencia Sortheix; Jennifer Tong; Victoria Wai-Lan Yeung; Jacob Duffy; William B Swann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Predictable or not? Individuals' risk decisions do not necessarily predict their next ones.

Authors:  Kin Fai Ellick Wong; Cecilia Cheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Towards a scientific concept of free will as a biological trait: spontaneous actions and decision-making in invertebrates.

Authors:  Björn Brembs
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Inapplicability of advance directives in a paternalistic setting: the case of a post-communist health system.

Authors:  Gentian Vyshka; Jera Kruja
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Responsibility and cooperativeness are constrained, not determined.

Authors:  Danilo Garcia; Alva Stråge; Sebastian Lundström; Susanna Radovic; Sven Brändström; Maria Råstam; Thomas Nilsson; C Robert Cloninger; Nóra Kerekes; Henrik Anckarsäter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-07

10.  The Chemical Origin of Behavior is Rooted in Abiogenesis.

Authors:  Brian C Larson; R Paul Jensen; Niles Lehman
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2012-11-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.