INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound imaging, using either an inline or an external transducer, is a standard method for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) monitoring. This study investigates whether image distortions caused by the low sound speed of fatty tissue could lead to incorrect stone positioning such that disintegration is affected. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To define the accuracy needed for SWL monitoring, the dependency of fragmentation efficiency on the distance between stone center and SWL focus was examined by in vitro model stone tests. In a clinical study, 15 patients with kidney stones were treated with a Dornier Sigma FarSight. This lithotripter was equipped with both an inline and an external transducer. They were operated alternately to check for inconsistencies, which would indicate ultrasound image distortions. In addition, the ultrasound paths from the transducer to the SWL focus were analyzed for error estimation. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In the model stone tests, the number of shock waves required for complete fragmentation doubled if the stone was about 7.5 to 10 mm off focus in lateral direction. In the clinical trial, the stone positions obtained from an inline and an external transducer coincided within a 5 mm range of tolerance, but that approach suffered from some practical difficulties, resulting in measurement imprecision. The sound path analysis showed that the lengths through fatty tissue were too short to result in significant image distortion. The body mass index (20-31 kg/m(2)) was representative, except for very obese patients. Additional confirmation of correct stone positioning could be achieved quite easily by looking for pixel movement in the B-mode image or employing Doppler hit/miss monitoring. CONCLUSION: Within the study group, no image distortion caused by fatty tissue that could be clinically relevant for SWL was observed.
INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound imaging, using either an inline or an external transducer, is a standard method for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) monitoring. This study investigates whether image distortions caused by the low sound speed of fatty tissue could lead to incorrect stone positioning such that disintegration is affected. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To define the accuracy needed for SWL monitoring, the dependency of fragmentation efficiency on the distance between stone center and SWL focus was examined by in vitro model stone tests. In a clinical study, 15 patients with kidney stones were treated with a Dornier Sigma FarSight. This lithotripter was equipped with both an inline and an external transducer. They were operated alternately to check for inconsistencies, which would indicate ultrasound image distortions. In addition, the ultrasound paths from the transducer to the SWL focus were analyzed for error estimation. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In the model stone tests, the number of shock waves required for complete fragmentation doubled if the stone was about 7.5 to 10 mm off focus in lateral direction. In the clinical trial, the stone positions obtained from an inline and an external transducer coincided within a 5 mm range of tolerance, but that approach suffered from some practical difficulties, resulting in measurement imprecision. The sound path analysis showed that the lengths through fatty tissue were too short to result in significant image distortion. The body mass index (20-31 kg/m(2)) was representative, except for very obesepatients. Additional confirmation of correct stone positioning could be achieved quite easily by looking for pixel movement in the B-mode image or employing Doppler hit/miss monitoring. CONCLUSION: Within the study group, no image distortion caused by fatty tissue that could be clinically relevant for SWL was observed.
Authors: Michael Ordon; Sero Andonian; Brian Blew; Trevor Schuler; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2015-12-14 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Jens J Rassweiler; Thomas Knoll; Kai-Uwe Köhrmann; James A McAteer; James E Lingeman; Robin O Cleveland; Michael R Bailey; Christian Chaussy Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-02-23 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Mohamed Gadelmoula; Ahmad A Elderwy; Islam F Abdelkawi; Ahmed M Moeen; Ghaleb Althamthami; Ahmed M Abdel-Moneim Journal: Urol Ann Date: 2019 Oct-Dec
Authors: Mucong Li; Nikhila Nyayapathi; Hailey I Kilian; Jun Xia; Jonathan F Lovell; Junjie Yao Journal: Mol Imaging Date: 2020 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 3.250