| Literature DB >> 31652580 |
Jianping Wang1, Zengqiao Yang2, Pietro Celi3,4, Lei Yan5, Xuemei Ding6, Shiping Bai7, Qiufeng Zeng8, Xiangbing Mao9, Bing Feng10, Shengyu Xu11, Keying Zhang12.
Abstract
High dietary levels of molybdenum (MO) can negatively affect productive performances and health status of laying hens, while tea polyphenol (TP) can mitigate the negative impact of high MO exposure. However, our understanding of the changes induced by TP on MO challenged layers performances and oxidative status, and on the microbiota, remains limited. The aim of the present study was to better understand host (performances and redox balance) and microbiota responses in MO-challenged layers with dietary TP. In this study, 200 Lohmann laying hens (65-week-old) were randomly allocated in a 2 × 2 factorial design to receive a diet with or without MO (0 or 100 mg/kg), and supplemented with either 0 or 600 mg/kg TP. The results indicate that 100 mg/kg MO decreased egg production (p = 0.03), while dietary TP increased egg production in MO challenged layers (p < 0.01). Egg yolk color was decreased by high MO (p < 0.01), while dietary TP had no effect on yolk color (p > 0.05). Serum alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and malonaldehyde (MDA) concentration were increased by high MO, while total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), xanthine oxidase (XOD) activity, glutathione s-transferase (GSH-ST), and glutathione concentration in serum were decreased (p < 0.05). Dietary TP was able to reverse the increasing effect of MO on ALT and AST (p < 0.05). High MO resulted in higher MO levels in serum, liver, kidney, and egg, but it decreased Cu and Se content in serum, liver, and egg (p < 0.05). The Fe concentration in liver, kidney, and eggs was significantly lower in MO supplementation groups (p < 0.05). High MO levels in the diet led to lower Firmicutes and higher Proteobacteria abundance, whereas dietary TP alone and/or in high MO treatment increased the Firmicutes abundance and the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio at phylum level. High MO increased the abundance of Proteobacteria (phylum), Deltaproteobacteria (class), Mytococcales (order), and Nanocystaceae (family), whereas dietary TP promoted the enrichment of Lactobacillus agilis (species). Dietary TP also enhanced the enrichment of Bacilli (class), Lactobacillates (order), Lactobacillus (family), and Lactobacillus gasseri (species). Microbiota analysis revealed differentially enriched microbial compositions in the cecum caused by MO and TP, which might be responsible for the protective effect of dietary TP during a MO challenge.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant capacity; gut microbiota; layers; molybdenum; tea polyphenols
Year: 2019 PMID: 31652580 PMCID: PMC6826559 DOI: 10.3390/antiox8100503
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Figure 1Effect of molybdenum and tea polyphenols on the trace element content in serum and tissues. (A) Trace element content in serum; (B) Trace element content in liver, (C) Trace element content in kidney; (D) Trace element content in egg (dry matter basis).
Effect of molybdenum and tea polyphenols and serum antioxidant status of laying hens.
| Items 1 | T-AOC, | GSH-ST, | GSH, | SOD, | MDA, | GSH-Px, | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MO, mg/kg | TP, mg/kg | ||||||
| 0 | 0 | 5.40 ± 0.46 a | 110.61 ± 23.21 a | 89.48 ± 16.31 b | 20.34 ± 4.10 | 4.76 ± 1.21 b | 1706.1 ± 189.2 |
| 0 | 600 | 4.80 ± 0.29 a | 116.05 ± 16.20 a | 106.94 ± 11.32 a | 19.42 ± 2.78 | 5.72 ± 0.78 b | 1616.8 ± 98.3 |
| 100 | 0 | 3.55 ± 0.54 b | 69.35 ± 23.22 b | 47.72 ± 16.20 c | 13.89 ± 5.77 | 8.57 ± 1.32 a | 1469.1 ± 210.1 |
| 100 | 600 | 3.84 ± 0.33 b | 99.95 ± 19.19 a,b | 82.20 ± 17.81 b | 18.42 ± 8.21 | 6.45 ± 1.89 b | 1942.6 ± 245.8 |
| 0.06 | 0.03 | <0.01 | 0.28 | 0.04 | 0.73 | ||
| MO | 0.04 | <0.01 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.01 | 0.96 | |
| TP | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.43 | 0.65 | 0.18 | |
| MO*TP 2 | 0.29 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 0.01 | 0.53 | |
1 Each mean represents 5 cages, with 2 layer/cage. Abbreviations represented: TP = tea polyphenols; MO = molybdenum; T-AOC = total antioxidant capacity; GSH-ST = glutathione s-transferase; GSH = glutathione; SOD = superoxide dismutase; MDA = malonaldehyde; GSH-Px = glutathione peroxidase. 2 MO*TP means the interaction between MO and TP. a,b Means in the same column with different letters differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Rank abundance curve of bacterial OTUs derived from each sample (A). Venn diagram illustrated in cecum microbiota among the samples (B). The relative abundance of the top 10 phylum from samples (C). Bar graph of the top 10 genus from samples (D).
Effect of molybdenum and tea polyphenols on top 5 phylum abundance of cecum microbiota of laying hens.
| Items 1 | Firmicutes | Proteobacteria | Bacteroidetes | Actinobacteria | Gemmatimonadetes | Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MO, mg/kg | TP, mg/kg | ||||||
| 0 | 0 | 75.68 ± 6.78 a | 5.34 ± 2.18b | 10.52 ± 4.25 | 5.25 ± 1.21 | 0.79 ± 0.09 b | 23.10 ± 8.24 a |
| 0 | 600 | 86.36 ± 8.99 a | 2.15 ± 0.89b | 5.98 ± 2.34 | 4.26 ± 0.78 | 0.10 ± 0.03 b | 19.29 ± 6.10 a |
| 100 | 0 | 41.77 ± 5.78 b | 30.48 ± 2.21a | 12.39 ± 4.21 | 5.85 ± 0.45 | 2.52 ± 0.21 a | 4.53±0.37 b |
| 100 | 600 | 77.78 ± 7.91 a | 8.18 ± 1.21b | 4.12 ± 1.09 | 5.43 ± 0.37 | 0.71 ± 0.10b | 29.46±8.98 a |
| <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.28 | 0.86 | <0.01 | 0.01 | ||
| MO | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.99 | 0.52 | <0.01 | 0.60 | |
| TP | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.06 | 0.61 | <0.01 | 0.19 | |
| MO*TP 2 | 0.03 | <0.01 | 0.57 | 0.84 | 0.05 | 0.05 | |
1 Each mean represents 5 cages, with 2 layer/cage. Abbreviations represented: TP = tea polyphenols; MO = molybdenum. 2 MO*TP means the interaction between MO and TP. a,b Means in the same column with different letters differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Effect of molybdenum and tea polyphenols on biodiversity of cecum microbiota of laying hens.
| Items 1 | OTU | Chao1 | Shannon | Simpson | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MO, mg/kg | TP, mg/kg | ||||
| 0 | 0 | 551.4 ± 109.3 | 1486.1 ± 254.8 | 5.56 ± 0.76 | 0.91 ± 0.07 |
| 0 | 600 | 452.6 ± 145.5 | 1108.6 ± 227.6 | 4.45 ± 0.91 | 0.81 ± 0.11 |
| 100 | 0 | 815.5 ± 178.2 | 1865.7 ± 363.7 | 7.01 ± 0.77 | 0.96 ± 0.38 |
| 100 | 600 | 588.0 ± 139.2 | 1555.4 ± 290.6 | 5.34 ± 0.44 | 0.90 ± 0.06 |
| 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.04 | 0.15 | ||
| MO | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.10 | |
| TP | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.48 | |
| MO*TP 2 | 0.18 | 0.88 | 0.61 | 0.57 | |
1 Each mean represents 5 cages, with 2 layer/cage. Abbreviations represented: TP = tea polyphenols; MO = molybdenum. 2 MO*TP means the interaction between MO and TP.
Figure 3Principal coordinate analysis plot of the cecum microbiota based on the unweighted UniFrac metric.
Figure 4Linear discrimination analysis coupled with effect size (LEfSe) identified the most differentially abundant taxa in the cecum microbiota of MO-fed layers. (A) Taxonomic cladogram obtained from LEfSe analysis of 16SrRNA sequencing. Biomarker taxa are heighted by colored circles and shaded areas. Each circle’s diameter is relative to abundance of taxa in the community. (B) Only taxa meeting an LDA significant threshold > 3 are shown. (Red) CON enriched taxa; (Green) MO enriched taxa; (Blue) MT enriched taxa; (Purple) TP enriched taxa.