| Literature DB >> 35936887 |
Hua Liu1,2, Qian Lin2,3, Xiubin Liu1,2, Peng Huang1,2, Zihui Yang2,4, Manhu Cao1, Mengting Liu2,4, Xinyao Li2,4, Jianguo Zeng2,4, Jianhua He1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of dietary Bopu powder supplementation on the serum antioxidant capacity, serum biochemical indices, egg quality, and intestinal microbiota. Six hundred and forty-eight 33-week-old Lohmann Brown commercial laying hens were randomly allocated into six groups and fed a basal diet supplemented with 0, 25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg Bopu powder for 8 weeks, denoted BP0, BP25, BP50, BP100, BP200, and BP400, respectively. The results showed that dietary Bopu powder supplementation reduced serum cholesterol concentrations (linear, p < 0.01) while increasing serum globulin and albumin concentrations (linear, p < 0.05). Furthermore, the BP50 and BP100 groups had greater serum catalase and glutathione peroxidase activity (p < 0.05). The egg Haugh Units were considerably higher in BP25 and BP50 (p < 0.05), and eggshell thickness was higher in BP25, BP200, and BP400 (p < 0.05) when compared to BP0. Dietary treatment with Bopu powder at doses ranging from 25-100 mg/kg improved glutathione peroxidase and catalase activities while decreasing malondialdehyde concentrations in the yolk (p < 0.05). The addition of Bopu powder increased the diversity of microbiota and the relative abundance of Bacteroidota in the gut. For instance, dietary Bopu powder supplementation of 25-50 mg/kg significantly raised the relative abundance of Enterococcus, Bacteroides, and Fusobacterium in the foregut. Supplementing the diet with 50-100 mg/kg of Bopu powder improved the relative abundance of Lactobacillus in the hindgut. In conclusion, dietary Bopu powder supplementation enhanced the abundance of beneficial bacteria in the foregut of laying hens and improved egg quality and antioxidant capacity. Furthermore, in the laying hen diet, the optimal dosage of Bopu powder additive was 25-50 mg/kg.Entities:
Keywords: Bopu powder; antioxidant capacity; egg quality; gut microbiota; laying hens
Year: 2022 PMID: 35936887 PMCID: PMC9353574 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.902784
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.755
Composition and nutrient levels of basal diets (air-dry basis, %).
| Items | Diets |
|---|---|
| Ingredients, % | |
| Corn | 55.45 |
| Soybean meal | 29.8 |
| Soybean Oil | 1.6 |
| Wheat bran | 1.2 |
| Limestone | 8.45 |
| CaHPO4·2H2O | 1.2 |
| NaCl | 0.3 |
| Premix | 2 |
| Total | 100.00 |
| Nutrient content | |
| Metabolic energy, MJ/kg | 11.5 |
| Crude protein, % | 17.00 |
| Crude fiber, % | 3.14 |
| Ca, % | 3.50 |
| Total phosphorus, % | 0.55 |
| Available phosphorus, % | 0.33 |
| Lys, % | 0.95 |
| Met, % | 0.36 |
| Met + Cys, % | 0.65 |
The premix provided the following (per kilogram of complete diet) micronutrients: VA, 6,000 IU, VD3 2,500 IU, VE, 25 mg, VK3 2.25 mg, VB1 1.8 mg, VB2 7 mg, VB6 4 mg, VB12 0.2 mg, D-pantothenic acid 12 mg, nicotinic acid 35 mg, biotin 0.14 mg, folic acid 0.8 mg, Cu (as copper sulfate) 11 mg, Zn (as zinc sulfate) 70 mg, Fe (as ferrous sulfate) 60 mg, Mn (as manganese sulfate) 115 mg, Se (as sodium selenite) 0.30 mg, and I (as potassium iodide) 0.4 mg.
Nutrient levels are calculated values.
Effect of dietary Bopu powder supplementation on the performance of laying hen.
| Item | Bopu powder, mg/kg | SEM |
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 200 | 400 | ANOVA | Linear | Quadratic | |||
| Egg production, % | Week 1 to 4 | 89.25 | 89.88 | 90.04 | 90.59 | 90.48 | 91.11 | 0.627 | 0.977 | 0.373 | 0.676 |
| Week 5 to 8 | 89.66 | 89.00 | 89.93 | 88.69 | 89.90 | 88.41 | 0.758 | 0.989 | 0.759 | 0.936 | |
| Week 1 to 8 | 89.46 | 89.44 | 89.99 | 89.64 | 90.19 | 89.76 | 0.643 | 0.999 | 0.802 | 0.959 | |
| Average egg mass, g/hen/day | Week 1 to 4 | 51.88 | 53.20 | 52.82 | 52.80 | 53.36 | 53.45 | 0.400 | 0.906 | 0.313 | 0.587 |
| Week 5 to 8 | 54.54 | 54.94 | 55.66 | 54.76 | 55.26 | 54.23 | 0.461 | 0.967 | 0.857 | 0.479 | |
| Week 1 to 8 | 53.20 | 54.10 | 54.22 | 53.78 | 54.28 | 53.85 | 0.387 | 0.979 | 0.688 | 0.783 | |
| Average daily feed intake, g/hen/day | Week 1 to 4 | 115.14 | 115.00 | 115.10 | 114.76 | 115.01 | 114.87 | 0.057 | 0.714 | 0.173 | 0.371 |
| Week 5 to 8 | 116.02 | 116.04 | 116.00 | 116.02 | 116.08 | 116.03 | 0.015 | 0.943 | 0.478 | 0.777 | |
| Week 1 to 8 | 115.58 | 115.52 | 115.56 | 115.38 | 115.57 | 115.45 | 0.031 | 0.714 | 0.308 | 0.563 | |
| FCR, g/g | Week 1 to 4 | 2.23 | 2.17 | 2.18 | 2.19 | 2.16 | 2.16 | 0.017 | 0.840 | 0.266 | 0.497 |
| Week 5 to 8 | 2.13 | 2.12 | 2.09 | 2.13 | 2.11 | 2.15 | 0.018 | 0.971 | 0.795 | 0.751 | |
| Week 1 to 8 | 2.18 | 2.14 | 2.14 | 2.16 | 2.13 | 2.15 | 0.016 | 0.966 | 0.662 | 0.740 | |
FCR, feed conversion ratio.
Effect of dietary Bopu powder supplementation on serum biochemical parameters indices of laying hens.
| Item | Bopu powder, mg/kg | SEM |
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 200 | 400 | ANOVA | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| GLU, mmol/L | 10.00 | 10.21 | 10.90 | 10.80 | 11.02 | 11.07 | 0.156 | 0.214 | 0.052 | 0.053 |
| TG, mmol/L | 24.31 | 23.89 | 25.82 | 24.76 | 22.05 | 22.17 | 0.637 | 0.530 | 0.117 | 0.298 |
| CHO, mmol/L | 5.42b | 5.58b | 5.41b | 5.36b | 5.01a | 4.90a | 0.064 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| UA, umol/L | 0.223 | 0.210 | 0.220 | 0.213 | 0.277 | 0.270 | 0.014 | 0.689 | 0.128 | 0.300 |
| GLB, g/L | 67.27b | 77.99a | 71.68ab | 67.4b | 70.44ab | 75.13ab | 2.673 | 0.045 | 0.017 | 0.337 |
| ALB, g/L | 14.91b | 14.13b | 14.20b | 14.04b | 15.48a | 15.48a | 0.195 | 0.038 | 0.021 | 0.077 |
| TP, g/L | 82.18b | 92.12a | 85.88ab | 81.44b | 85.92ab | 90.61a | 3.430 | 0.023 | 0.653 | 0.464 |
| ALT, U/L | 5.276 | 4.698 | 5.899 | 5.99 | 5.565 | 4.64 | 0.233 | 0.431 | 0.416 | 0.238 |
| AST, U/L | 210.43 | 234.47 | 223.27 | 243.33 | 187.67 | 197.83 | 7.22 | 0.180 | 0.112 | 0.293 |
a,bMeans in the same row with different superscript letters indicate differences (p < 0.05).
GLU, glucose; TG, triglyceride; CHO, cholesterol; UA, uric acid; GLB, globulin; ALB, albumin; TP, total protein; ALT, glutamic-pyruvic transaminase; AST, glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase.
Effect of dietary Bopu powder supplementation on serum antioxidant capacity of laying hens.
| Item | Bopu powder, mg/kg | SEM |
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 200 | 400 | ANOVA | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| T-AOC, mmol/L | 1.10 | 1.21 | 1.20 | 1.40 | 1.20 | 1.33 | 0.040 | 0.362 | 0.238 | 0.407 |
| T-SOD, U/ml | 722.32 | 682.78 | 703.92 | 712.93 | 736.85 | 649.18 | 12.94 | 0.475 | 0.238 | 0.172 |
| GSH-Px, U/ml | 175.86a | 219.36 ab | 240.00b | 257.49b | 227.52 ab | 256.12b | 88.17 | 0.042 | 0.062 | 0.086 |
| GSH, umol/L | 40.11 | 44.23 | 41.80 | 40.71 | 44.43 | 45.51 | 1.034 | 0.634 | 0.170 | 0.403 |
| CAT, U/ml | 3.8b | 8.0a | 7.9a | 7.6a | 8.8a | 8.1a | 0.110 | 0.001 | 0.032 | 0.585 |
| MAD, nmol/ml | 8.66 | 8.33 | 7.50 | 8.26 | 8.15 | 6.79 | 0.804 | 0.993 | 0.557 | 0.837 |
a,bMeans in the same row with different superscript letters indicate differences (p < 0.05).
T-AOC, total antioxidative capacity; T-SOD, total superoxide dismutase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; GSH, glutathione; CAT, catalase; MAD, malondialdehyde.
Effect of dietary Bopu powder supplementation on egg quality of laying hens (8 weeks).
| Item | Bopu powder, mg/kg | SEM |
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 200 | 400 | ANOVA | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| Egg shape index | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.34 | 1.36 | 1.32 | 1.34 | 0.005 | 0.499 | 0.181 | 0.285 |
| Eggshell strength, kgf | 4.60 | 4.73 | 4.52 | 4.30 | 4.56 | 4.54 | 0.064 | 0.574 | 0.769 | 0.645 |
| Egg weight, g | 60.78 | 61.60 | 62.22 | 59.96 | 60.81 | 61.58 | 0.257 | 0.085 | 0.432 | 0.812 |
| Haugh units | 58.15b | 66.42a | 65.08a | 64.59ab | 58.76b | 58.40b | 1.039 | 0.046 | 0.065 | 0.172 |
| Yolk color score | 4.10 | 3.90 | 4.00 | 3.83 | 4.00 | 3.90 | 0.146 | 0.981 | 0.777 | 0.933 |
| Yolk width, mm | 39.65 | 40.03 | 38.93 | 40.36 | 39.33 | 40.48 | 0.263 | 0.534 | 0.367 | 0.560 |
| Yolk height, mm | 16.55 | 16.39 | 16.32 | 16.30 | 16.16 | 16.42 | 0.113 | 0.960 | 0.841 | 0.616 |
| Yolk weight, % | 27.19 | 28.20 | 28.53 | 27.78 | 27.47 | 27.39 | 0.214 | 0.431 | 0.365 | 0.630 |
| Shell thickness, mm | 0.335b | 0.352a | 0.346ab | 0.332b | 0.351a | 0.351a | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.080 | 0.191 |
| Shell weigh, % | 9.36 | 9.47 | 9.44 | 9.79 | 9.80 | 9.54 | 0.080 | 0.513 | 0.416 | 0.150 |
a,bMeans in the same row with different superscript letters indicate differences (p < 0.05).
Effect of dietary Bopu powder supplementation on the antioxidant capacity of yolk.
| Item | Bopu powder, mg/kg | SEM |
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 200 | 400 | ANOVA | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| T-AOC, U/ml | 15.57 | 16.38 | 13.09 | 12.24 | 13.55 | 13.55 | 1.014 | 0.866 | 0.010 | 0.064 |
| T-SOD, U/ml | 425.00 | 397.58 | 451.00 | 372.08 | 427.58 | 350.17 | 23.248 | 0.135 | 0.235 | 0.552 |
| GSH-Px, U/ml | 207.19b | 490.13a | 690.56a | 390.77a | 215.45b | 345.92ab | 50.955 | 0.034 | 0.130 | 0.268 |
| CAT, U/ml | 65.15b | 73.55a | 72.85a | 67.60ab | 69.65ab | 61.74b | 3.358 | 0.001 | 0.685 | 0.207 |
| MDA, nmol/ml | 204.25b | 144.80a | 170.30ab | 177.14ab | 294.16c | 212.00b | 11.810 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.033 |
a,b,cMeans in the same row with different superscript letters indicate differences (p < 0.05).
T-AOC, total antioxidative capacity; T-SOD, total superoxide dismutase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; GSH, glutathione; CAT, catalase; MAD, malondial.
FIGURE 1(A) Venn diagram of intestinal microbiota at family level. (B) Venn diagram of intestinal microbiota at genus level.
FIGURE 2Alpha diversity analysis in foregut.
FIGURE 3Alpha diversity analysis in hindgut.
FIGURE 4Beta Hierarchical clustering analysis of intestinal microbiota on family level.
FIGURE 5PcoA analysis of intestinal microbiota on family level.
FIGURE 6(A) The community barplot analysis of intestinal microbiota at phylum level. (B) The community barplot analysis of intestinal microbiota at family level. (C) The community barplot analysis of intestinal microbiota at genus level.
FIGURE 7LEfSe analysis of microbiota in hindgut.