Literature DB >> 3958321

Level discrimination of tones as a function of duration.

M Florentine.   

Abstract

Difference limens for level [delta Ls (dB) = 20 log[p + delta p)/p), where p is the pressure] were measured as a function of duration for tones at 250, 500, and 8000 Hz. Stimulus durations ranged from 2 ms to 2 s, and the stimulus power was held constant. Rise and fall times were 1 ms. The interstimulus interval was 250 ms. At each frequency, three levels were tested: 85, 65, and approximately 40 dB SPL. An adaptive two-alternative forced-choice procedure with feedback was used. For three normal listeners, delta Ls decreased as duration increased, up to at least 2 s, except at 250 Hz. At 250 Hz, delta L stopped decreasing at durations between 0.5 and 1 s. In a double logarithmic plot of delta L versus duration, the rate of decrease is generally well fitted by a sloping line. The average slope is -0.28; it is steeper at high levels than at low levels. Because the average slope is shallower than the -0.5 slope predicted for an optimum detector, it may be that fast adaptation of auditory-nerve activity and/or memory effects interfere with level discrimination of long-duration tones. Finally, the delta Ls at 8 kHz decreased nonmonotonically with increasing level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3958321     DOI: 10.1121/1.393469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Informational and neural adaptation curves are asynchronous.

Authors:  L M Ward
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

2.  Effects of external noise on detection of intensity increments.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Kim S Schairer; Lance Nizami; Samar Khaddam; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory discrimination of tone-pulse onsets.

Authors:  J Smurzyński; A J Houtsma
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-01

4.  The Effects of Duration and Level on Spectral Modulation Perception.

Authors:  Sittiprapa Isarangura; Ann C Eddins; Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Auditory Time-Frequency Masking for Spectrally and Temporally Maximally-Compact Stimuli.

Authors:  Thibaud Necciari; Bernhard Laback; Sophie Savel; Sølvi Ystad; Peter Balazs; Sabine Meunier; Richard Kronland-Martinet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of Cognitive Load on Pure-Tone Audiometry Thresholds in Younger and Older Adults.

Authors:  Antje Heinrich; Melanie A Ferguson; Sven L Mattys
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Harmonicity aids hearing in noise.

Authors:  Malinda J McPherson; River C Grace; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.157

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.