Literature DB >> 31637946

Refractory seizures: Prediction of outcome of surgical intervention based on results from PET-CT, PET-MRI and electroencephaolography.

Rashad Johnson1, Grace Rizk1, Harleen Kaur1, Henry Ibekwe1, Monica Atta1, Isis Gayed1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to evaluate the effectiveness of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) and PET-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with scalp and intracranial electroencephalogram (EEG) in predicting surgical outcomes in patients with refractory seizures.
METHODS: Patients who underwent PET-CT and MRI fusion, scalp and intracranial EEG, and subsequent surgical intervention were retrospectively included. PET-CT were fused with MRI and interpreted by an experienced blinded reader. An area of hypometabolism on PET was identified as the location of the epileptic focus. The site of seizure focus was correlated with scalp and intracranial EEG findings. Surgical outcomes were evaluated. Thirty-six patients were included; all had presurgical PET-CT, scalp EEG, and PET-MRI fusion, and 28 of these patients had intracranial EEGs.
RESULTS: PET-CT showed concordance of epileptic foci with scalp EEG in 7/36 patients (19%) and with intracranial EEG in 9/28 patients (32%). PET-MRI was concordant with scalp EEG in 6/36 patients (17%) and with intracranial EEG in 8/28 patients (29%). All patients with concordance of epileptic foci between PET-CT and PET-MRI and scalp EEG had improvement or resolution of seizures postintervention, and 89% of patients had concordance between intracranial EEG and PET studies. However, 45% of patients with discordant PET-CT and scalp EEG, 37% with discordance PET-CT and intracranial EEG, 43% with discordant PET-MRI and scalp EEG, and 35% of patients with discordant PET-MRI and intracranial EEG did not improve postsurgically.
CONCLUSION: Concordance of epileptic foci localization between PET imaging and EEG yields favorable postoperative outcome in nearly all patients, whereas discordance has an equal probability of favorable vs unfavorable outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; PET-CT; PET-MRI; epilepsy; seizure

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31637946      PMCID: PMC7005988          DOI: 10.1177/1971400919881464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiol J        ISSN: 1971-4009


  20 in total

1.  Double match of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET and iomazenil-SPECT improves outcomes of focus resection surgery.

Authors:  Ayataka Fujimoto; Tohru Okanishi; Sotaro Kanai; Keishiro Sato; Shinji Itamura; Shimpei Baba; Mitsuyo Nishimura; Takayuki Masui; Hideo Enoki
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Subsequent experience in hybrid PET-MRI for evaluation of refractory focal onset epilepsy.

Authors:  Jorge Daniel Oldan; Hae Won Shin; Amir Hossein Khandani; Carlos Zamora; Thad Benefield; Valerie Jewells
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.184

Review 3.  Role of neuroimaging in first seizure diagnosis.

Authors:  Candice E Crocker; Bernhard Pohlmann-Eden; Matthias H Schmidt
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.184

4.  Surgical outcome in patients with MRI-negative, PET-positive temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  Irem Yıldırım Capraz; Gökhan Kurt; Özgür Akdemir; Tugba Hirfanoglu; Yusuf Oner; Tugba Sengezer; Lütfiye Ozlem Atay Kapucu; Ayse Serdaroglu; Erhan Bilir
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.184

5.  Failed epilepsy surgery deserves a second chance.

Authors:  Chrystal M Reed; Sandra Dewar; Itzhak Fried; Jerome Engel; Dawn Eliashiv
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 1.876

6.  Surgical decision making in temporal lobe epilepsy: a comparison of [(18)F]FDG-PET, MRI, and EEG.

Authors:  Aaron F Struck; Lance T Hall; John M Floberg; Scott B Perlman; Douglas A Dulli
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.937

7.  Long-term epilepsy surgery outcomes in patients with PET-positive, MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  Peng-Fan Yang; Jia-Sheng Pei; Hui-Jian Zhang; Qiao Lin; Zhen Mei; Zhong-Hui Zhong; Jun Tian; Yan-Zeng Jia; Zi-Qian Chen; Zhi-Yong Zheng
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.937

8.  PET/MRI and PET/MRI/SISCOM coregistration in the presurgical evaluation of refractory focal epilepsy.

Authors:  S Fernández; A Donaire; E Serès; X Setoain; N Bargalló; C Falcón; F Sanmartí; I Maestro; J Rumià; L Pintor; T Boget; J Aparicio; M Carreño
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 3.045

Review 9.  Prognostic factors for seizure outcome in patients with MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Xiu Wang; Chao Zhang; Yao Wang; Wenhan Hu; Xiaoqiu Shao; Jian-Guo Zhang; Kai Zhang
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 3.184

10.  Initial experience in hybrid PET-MRI for evaluation of refractory focal onset epilepsy.

Authors:  Hae W Shin; Valerie Jewells; Arif Sheikh; Jingwen Zhang; Hongtu Zhu; Hongyu An; Wei Gao; Dinggang Shen; Eldad Hadar; Weili Lin
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.184

View more
  1 in total

1.  Seizure control does not predict hippocampal subfield volume change in children with focal drug-resistant epilepsy.

Authors:  Matthias W Wagner; Jovanka Skocic; Elysa Widjaja
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-10-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.