Literature DB >> 29096138

Failed epilepsy surgery deserves a second chance.

Chrystal M Reed1, Sandra Dewar2, Itzhak Fried3, Jerome Engel2, Dawn Eliashiv2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Resective epilepsy surgery has been shown to have up to 70-80% success rates in patients with intractable seizure disorder. Around 20-30% of patients with Engel Classification III and IV will require reevaluation for further surgery. Common reasons for first surgery failures include incomplete resection of seizure focus, incorrect identification of seizure focus and recurrence of tumor. PATIENT AND METHODS: Clinical chart review of seventeen patients from a single adult comprehensive epilepsy program who underwent reoperation from 2007 to 2014 was performed. High resolution Brain MRI, FDG-PET, Neuropsychometric testing were completed in all cases in both the original surgery and the second procedure. Postoperative outcomes were confirmed by prospective telephone follow up and verified by review of the patient's electronic medical records. Outcomes were classified according to the modified Engel classification system: Engel classes I and II are considered good outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of seventeen patients (involving 10 females) were included in the study. The average age of patients at second surgery was 42 (range 23-64 years). Reasons for reoperation included: incomplete first resection (n=13) and recurrence of tumor (n=4). Median time between the first and second surgery was 60 months. After the second surgery, ten of the seventeen patients (58.8%) achieved seizure freedom (Engel Class I), in agreement with other published reports. Of the ten patients who were Engel Class I, seven required extension of the previous resection margins, while three had surgery for recurrence of previously partially resected tumor.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that since the risk of complications from reoperation is low and the outcome, for some, is excellent, consideration of repeat surgery is justified.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epilepsy surgery; Failed epilepsy surgery; Repeat epilepsy surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29096138     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  5 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes of reoperations in epilepsy surgery.

Authors:  Ruta Yardi; Marcia E Morita-Sherman; Zachary Fitzgerald; Vineet Punia; James Bena; Shannon Morrison; Imad Najm; William Bingaman; Lara Jehi
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 5.864

2.  Refractory seizures: Prediction of outcome of surgical intervention based on results from PET-CT, PET-MRI and electroencephaolography.

Authors:  Rashad Johnson; Grace Rizk; Harleen Kaur; Henry Ibekwe; Monica Atta; Isis Gayed
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2019-10-22

3.  Utility of adding electrodes in patients undergoing invasive seizure localization: A case series.

Authors:  Alvin Y Chan; Brian V Lien; Nolan J Brown; Julian Gendreau; Ryan S Beyer; Chen Yi Yang; Elliot H Choi; Frank P K Hsu; Sumeet Vadera
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-07-09

Review 4.  PET and ictal SPECT can be helpful for localizing epileptic foci.

Authors:  Tim J von Oertzen
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.710

5.  Preliminary report: Late seizure recurrence years after epilepsy surgery may be associated with alterations in brain tissue transcriptome.

Authors:  Lara Jehi; Lamis Yehia; Charissa Peterson; Farshad Niazi; Robyn Busch; Richard Prayson; Zhong Ying; William Bingaman; Imad Najm; Charis Eng
Journal:  Epilepsia Open       Date:  2018-05-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.