| Literature DB >> 31634343 |
Ami Diakite1,2, Grégory Dubourg1,2, Niokhor Dione1,2, Pamela Afouda1,2, Sara Bellali1,2, Issa Isaac Ngom1,2, Camille Valles1,2, Matthieu Million1,2, Anthony Levasseur1,2, Frédéric Cadoret3, Jean-Christophe Lagier1,2, Didier Raoult1,2.
Abstract
Molecular approaches have long led to the assumption that the human gut microbiota is dominated by uncultivable bacteria. The recent advent of large-scale culturing methods, and in particular that of culturomics have demonstrated that these prokaryotes can in fact be cultured. This is increasing in a dramatic manner the repertoire of commensal microbes inhabiting the human gut. Following eight years of culturomics approach applied on more than 900 samples, we propose herein a remake of the pioneering study applying a dual approach including culturomics and metagenomics on a cohort of 8 healthy specimen. Here we show that culturomics enable a 20% higher richness when compared to molecular approaches by culturing 1 archaeal species and 494 bacterial species of which 19 were new taxa. Species discovered as a part of previous culturomics studies represent 30% of the cultivated isolates, while sequences derived from these new taxa enabled to increase by 22% the bacterial richness retrieved by metagenomics. Overall, 67% of the total reads generated were covered by cultured isolates, significantly reducing the hidden content of sequencing methods compared to the pioneering study. By redefining culture conditions to recover microbes previously considered fastidious, there are greater opportunities than ever to eradicate metagenomics dark matter.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31634343 PMCID: PMC6802823 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics from the donors sampled as a part of this study.
| Donors | Size (m) | Weight (Kg) | Body mass index | Age (years) | Gender | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Megagut 1 | 1,65 | 60 | 22 | 28 | Female | French |
| Megagut 2 | 1,8 | 72 | 22,2 | 32 | Male | Senegalese |
| Megagut 3 | 1,84 | 76 | 22,4 | 32 | Male | Senegalese |
| Megagut 4 | 1,75 | 55 | 18 | 27 | Female | Beninese |
| Megagut 5 | 1,79 | 95 | 29,6 | 32 | Male | Cameroon |
| Megagut 6 | 1,7 | 69 | 23,6 | 30 | Male | French |
| Megagut 7 | 1,65 | 70 | 25,7 | 27 | Female | Algerian |
| Megagut 8 | 1,78 | 82 | 25,9 | 27 | Male | Algerian |
Fig 1Number of isolated species by sample in culturomics.
Fig 2Number of identified species by metagenomics and distribution of associated reads percentage.
Grey bar represents the percentage of bacterial species identified as species level, including those first isolated by culturomics in dark grey.
Fig 3Comparison of bacterial species identified by metagenomics vs culturomics.
The small violet circle represents bacteria species.
Fig 4Comparison of read percentages of species identified by culturomics vs metagenomics.
The large circle in the center represents all species identified by metagenomics. The circles around them represent each sample. Blue part represents the percentage of reads corresponding to the species identified by culturomics. In beige, the remaining percentage of reads assigned to species level by metagenomics.