Literature DB >> 33691255

Development of a chronically-implanted mouse model for studies of cochlear health and implant function.

Deborah J Colesa1, Jenna Devare1, Donald L Swiderski1, Lisa A Beyer1, Yehoash Raphael1, Bryan E Pfingst2.   

Abstract

Mice with chronic cochlear implants can significantly contribute to our understanding of the relationship between cochlear health and implant function because of the availability of molecular tools for controlling conditions in the cochlea and transgenic lines modeling human disease. To date, research in implanted mice has mainly consisted of short-term studies, but since there are large changes in implant function following implant insertion trauma, and subsequent recovery in many cases, longer-term studies are needed to evaluate function and perception under stable conditions. Because frequent anesthetic administration can be especially problematic in mice, a chronic model that can be tested in the awake condition is desirable. Electrically-evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) recorded with multichannel cochlear implants are useful functional measures because they can be obtained daily without anesthesia. In this study, we assessed changes and stability of ECAPs, electrically-evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs), ensemble spontaneous activity (ESA), and impedance data over time after implanting mice with multichannel implants. We then compared these data to histological findings in these implanted cochleae, and compared results from this chronic mouse model to data previously obtained in a well-established chronically-implanted guinea pig model. We determined that mice can be chronically implanted with cochlear implants, and ECAP recordings can be obtained frequently in an awake state for up to at least 42 days after implantation. These recordings can effectively monitor changes or stability in cochlear function over time. ECAP and EABR amplitude-growth functions (AGFs), AGF slopes, ESA levels and impedances in mice with multichannel implants appear similar to those found in guinea pigs with long-term multichannel implants. Animals with better survival of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) and inner hair cells (IHCs) have steeper AGF slopes, and larger ESA responses. The time course of post-surgical ear recovery may be quicker in mice and can show different patterns of recovery which seem to be dependent on the degree of insertion trauma and subsequent histological conditions. Histology showed varying degrees of cochlear damage with fibrosis present in all implanted mouse ears and small amounts of new bone in a few ears. Impedance changes over time varied within and across animals and may represent changes over time in multiple variables in the cochlear environment post-implantation. Due to the small size of the mouse, susceptibility to stress, and the higher potential for implant failure, chronic implantation in mice can be challenging, but overall is feasible and useful for cochlear implant research.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory prosthesis; Cochlear implant; Electrically-evoked compound action potential (ECAP); Mouse

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33691255      PMCID: PMC8080901          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  31 in total

1.  A study of intra-cochlear electrodes and tissue interface by electrochemical impedance methods in vivo.

Authors:  Y Y Duan; G M Clark; R S C Cowan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Impedance changes in chronically implanted and stimulated cochlear implant electrodes.

Authors:  Carrie Newbold; Silvana Mergen; Rachael Richardson; Peter Seligman; Rodney Millard; Robert Cowan; Robert Shepherd
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-11-25

3.  Effect of interphase gap and pulse duration on electrically evoked potentials is correlated with auditory nerve survival.

Authors:  Pavel Prado-Guitierrez; Leonie M Fewster; John M Heasman; Colette M McKay; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Correlation between word recognition score and intracochlear new bone and fibrous tissue after cochlear implantation in the human.

Authors:  Takefumi Kamakura; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Cochlear implantation for chronic electrical stimulation in the mouse.

Authors:  S Irving; M I Trotter; J B Fallon; R E Millard; R K Shepherd; A K Wise
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Estimating eighth nerve survival by electrical stimulation.

Authors:  L Smith; F B Simmons
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  R D Hall
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Mouse cochleostomy: a minimally invasive dorsal approach for modeling cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Hakan Soken; Barbara K Robinson; Shawn S Goodman; Paul J Abbas; Marlan R Hansen; Jonathan C Kopelovich
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Assessing the Relationship Between the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential and Speech Recognition Abilities in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  A mouse model of cochlear implantation with chronic electric stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander D Claussen; René Vielman Quevedo; Brian Mostaert; Jonathon R Kirk; Wolfram F Dueck; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.