Literature DB >> 31624982

SAMPL6 blind predictions of water-octanol partition coefficients using nonequilibrium alchemical approaches.

Piero Procacci1, Guido Guarnieri2.   

Abstract

In this paper, we compute, by means of a non equilibrium alchemical technique, the water-octanol partition coefficients (LogP) for a series of drug-like compounds in the context of the SAMPL6 challenge initiative. Our blind predictions are based on three of the most popular non-polarizable force fields, CGenFF, GAFF2, and OPLS-AA and are critically compared to other MD-based predictions produced using free energy perturbation or thermodynamic integration approaches with stratification. The proposed non-equilibrium method emerges has a reliable tool for LogP prediction, systematically being among the top performing submissions in all force field classes for at least two among the various indicators such as the Pearson or the Kendall correlation coefficients or the mean unsigned error. Contrarily to the widespread equilibrium approaches, that yielded apparently very disparate results in the SAMPL6 challenge, all our independent prediction sets, irrespective of the adopted force field and of the adopted estimate (unidirectional or bidirectional) are, mutually, from moderately to strongly correlated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crooks theorem; Fast growth; Fast switching; HREX; Hamiltonian replica exchange; LogP; Non-equilibrium; SAMPL6; Solute tempering; Solvation free energy; Torsional tempering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31624982     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-019-00233-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  36 in total

1.  Bias and error in estimates of equilibrium free-energy differences from nonequilibrium measurements.

Authors:  Jeff Gore; Felix Ritort; Carlos Bustamante
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  New Soft-Core Potential Function for Molecular Dynamics Based Alchemical Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Vytautas Gapsys; Daniel Seeliger; Bert L de Groot
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  ORAC: a molecular dynamics simulation program to explore free energy surfaces in biomolecular systems at the atomistic level.

Authors:  Simone Marsili; Giorgio Federico Signorini; Riccardo Chelli; Massimo Marchi; Piero Procacci
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  The spatial structure in liquid water.

Authors:  P G Kusalik; I M Svishchev
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-08-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Solvation free energies via alchemical simulations: let's get honest about sampling, once more.

Authors:  Piero Procacci
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.676

6.  Statistical efficiency of methods for computing free energy of hydration.

Authors:  Ahmet Yildirim; Tsjerk A Wassenaar; David van der Spoel
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Automation of the CHARMM General Force Field (CGenFF) I: bond perception and atom typing.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; A D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Robustness in the fitting of molecular mechanics parameters.

Authors:  Kenno Vanommeslaeghe; Mingjun Yang; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; E Hatcher; C Acharya; S Kundu; S Zhong; J Shim; E Darian; O Guvench; P Lopes; I Vorobyov; A D Mackerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  PubChem Substance and Compound databases.

Authors:  Sunghwan Kim; Paul A Thiessen; Evan E Bolton; Jie Chen; Gang Fu; Asta Gindulyte; Lianyi Han; Jane He; Siqian He; Benjamin A Shoemaker; Jiyao Wang; Bo Yu; Jian Zhang; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  6 in total

1.  Enhanced Jarzynski free energy calculations using weighted ensemble.

Authors:  Nicole M Roussey; Alex Dickson
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Assessing the accuracy of octanol-water partition coefficient predictions in the SAMPL6 Part II log P Challenge.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Teresa Danielle Bergazin; Thomas Fox; Andrea Rizzi; John D Chodera; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  SAMPL6 Octanol-water partition coefficients from alchemical free energy calculations with MBIS atomic charges.

Authors:  Maximiliano Riquelme; Esteban Vöhringer-Martinez
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  SAMPL7 blind challenge: quantum-mechanical prediction of partition coefficients and acid dissociation constants for small drug-like molecules.

Authors:  Basak Koca Fındık; Zeynep Pinar Haslak; Evrim Arslan; Viktorya Aviyente
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Non-equilibrium approach for binding free energies in cyclodextrins in SAMPL7: force fields and software.

Authors:  Yuriy Khalak; Gary Tresadern; Bert L de Groot; Vytautas Gapsys
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Virtual Double-System Single-Box: A Nonequilibrium Alchemical Technique for Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations: Application to Ligands of the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease.

Authors:  Marina Macchiagodena; Marco Pagliai; Maurice Karrenbrock; Guido Guarnieri; Francesco Iannone; Piero Procacci
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 6.006

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.