Literature DB >> 25826578

Robustness in the fitting of molecular mechanics parameters.

Kenno Vanommeslaeghe1, Mingjun Yang, Alexander D MacKerell.   

Abstract

Automated methods for force field parametrization have attracted renewed interest of the community, but the robustness issues associated with the often ill-conditioned nature of parameter optimization have been vastly underappreciated in the recent literature. For this reason, this article offers a detailed description of the origin and nature of these issues. This includes a discussion of the restrained electrostatic potential fit (RESP) charge model, which does contain explicit robustness-enhancing measures albeit not in the context of bonded parameters, and which forms an inspiration for the present work. It is also discussed how all the bonded parameters in a Class I force field can be simultaneously fit using the linear least squares (LLS) procedure, and a novel restraining strategy is presented that overcomes robustness issues in the n class="Chemical">LLS fitting of bonded parameters while minimally impacting the fitted values of well-behaved parameters. Two variants of this methodology are then validated through a number of case studies, including the fitting of bond-charge increments, which illustrates the method's potential for robustly solving general LLS problems beyond force field parametrization.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CHARMM; empirical force fields; linear least squares; optimization; robustness

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25826578      PMCID: PMC4412823          DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  17 in total

1.  Accuracy of free energies of hydration using CM1 and CM3 atomic charges.

Authors:  Marina Udier-Blagović; Patricia Morales De Tirado; Shoshannah A Pearlman; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 2.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Automation of the CHARMM General Force Field (CGenFF) II: assignment of bonded parameters and partial atomic charges.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; E Prabhu Raman; A D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Rapid parameterization of small molecules using the Force Field Toolkit.

Authors:  Christopher G Mayne; Jan Saam; Klaus Schulten; Emad Tajkhorshid; James C Gumbart
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Additive and Classical Drude Polarizable Force Fields for Linear and Cyclic Ethers.

Authors:  Igor Vorobyov; Victor M Anisimov; Shannon Greene; Richard M Venable; Adam Moser; Richard W Pastor; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  CHARMM additive all-atom force field for aldopentofuranoses, methyl-aldopentofuranosides, and fructofuranose.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hatcher; Olgun Guvench; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; E Hatcher; C Acharya; S Kundu; S Zhong; J Shim; E Darian; O Guvench; P Lopes; I Vorobyov; A D Mackerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  Additive empirical force field for hexopyranose monosaccharides.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench; Shannon N Greene; Ganesh Kamath; John W Brady; Richard M Venable; Richard W Pastor; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2008-11-30       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 9.  Molecular mechanics.

Authors:  Kenno Vanommeslaeghe; Olgun Guvench; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

10.  Polarizable empirical force field for hexopyranose monosaccharides based on the classical Drude oscillator.

Authors:  Dhilon S Patel; Xibing He; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 2.991

View more
  26 in total

1.  Toward Learned Chemical Perception of Force Field Typing Rules.

Authors:  Camila Zanette; Caitlin C Bannan; Christopher I Bayly; Josh Fass; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; John D Chodera; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 2.  Open source molecular modeling.

Authors:  Somayeh Pirhadi; Jocelyn Sunseri; David Ryan Koes
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.518

3.  Drude polarizable force field for aliphatic ketones and aldehydes, and their associated acyclic carbohydrates.

Authors:  Meagan C Small; Asaminew H Aytenfisu; Fang-Yu Lin; Xibing He; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Conformational Preference of Serogroup B Salmonella O Polysaccharide in Presence and Absence of the Monoclonal Antibody Se155-4.

Authors:  Mingjun Yang; Raphael Simon; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  POVME 3.0: Software for Mapping Binding Pocket Flexibility.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Wagner; Jesper Sørensen; Nathan Hensley; Celia Wong; Clare Zhu; Taylor Perison; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 6.  Microscopic Characterization of Membrane Transporter Function by In Silico Modeling and Simulation.

Authors:  J V Vermaas; N Trebesch; C G Mayne; S Thangapandian; M Shekhar; P Mahinthichaichan; J L Baylon; T Jiang; Y Wang; M P Muller; E Shinn; Z Zhao; P-C Wen; E Tajkhorshid
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Proper balance of solvent-solute and solute-solute interactions in the treatment of the diffusion of glucose using the Drude polarizable force field.

Authors:  Mingjun Yang; Asaminew H Aytenfisu; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Carbohydr Res       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  Balanced polarizable Drude force field parameters for molecular anions: phosphates, sulfates, sulfamates, and oxides.

Authors:  Abhishek A Kognole; Asaminew H Aytenfisu; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 1.810

9.  Further Optimization and Validation of the Classical Drude Polarizable Protein Force Field.

Authors:  Fang-Yu Lin; Jing Huang; Poonam Pandey; Chetan Rupakheti; Jing Li; Benoı T Roux; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Parametrization of macrolide antibiotics using the force field toolkit.

Authors:  Anna Pavlova; James C Gumbart
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.376

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.