| Literature DB >> 31624499 |
Pratik Prashant Pawar1, Annamma Anil Odaneth1, Rajeshkumar Natwarlal Vadgama1, Arvind Mallinath Lali1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent trends in bioprocessing have underlined the significance of lignocellulosic biomass conversions for biofuel production. These conversions demand at least 90% energy upgradation of cellulosic sugars to generate renewable drop-in biofuel precursors (Heff/C ~ 2). Chemical methods fail to achieve this without substantial loss of carbon; whereas, oleaginous biological systems propose a greener upgradation route by producing oil from sugars with 30% theoretical yields. However, these oleaginous systems cannot compete with the commercial volumes of vegetable oils in terms of overall oil yields and productivities. One of the significant challenges in the commercial exploitation of these microbial oils lies in the inefficient recovery of the produced oil. This issue has been addressed using highly selective oil capturing agents (OCA), which allow a concomitant microbial oil production and in situ oil recovery process.Entities:
Keywords: Continuous production; Extractive production; Microbial oil; Oil capturing agent (OCA); Yarrowia lipolytica
Year: 2019 PMID: 31624499 PMCID: PMC6781333 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-019-1576-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Sudan black staining of lipids produced by Yarrowia lipolytica in the oil production broth. The oil production broth samples collected at different time intervals after inoculation, i.e., 0 h (a), 24 h (b), 48 h (c) and 72 h (d), were stained with Sudan Black B dye, followed by counterstaining with safranin dye and then observed under oil immersion at 100× magnification. Cells appearing red, represent staining by counterstain safranin and absence of intracellular lipids (a). Cells stained black, represent intracellular lipid accumulation (b–d). Small black droplets (stained with Sudan Black B dye) outside the cells represent extracellular oil in the broth (d)
Fig. 2Nile red fluorescence microscopy. Broth samples with cells in the growth phase (a), cells in the oil production phase (b), cells in oil production phase with in situ OCA (c) and those contacted to ex situ OCA, post-oil production (d), were stained by Nile red dye and observed under a fluorescence microscope. Fluorescence at 593 nm shows extracellular oil in the sample (− 1); Phase contrast mode shows intracellular oil accumulation (white) inside the cells (− 2) and an overlay (− 3) shows the distribution of microbial oil in the samples
Fig. 3Characterization of the microbial oil captured on OCA by Fourier transform Infra-Red (FTIR) analyses. The FT IR spectra of standard triglyceride (tri-caprylin) (a), free fatty acid (oleic acid) (b), and OCA captured microbial oil (c), are overlaid for comparison
Fig. 4FTIR spectra of intact cells of Yarrowia lipolytica. Cells from the growth phase (A); oil production phase (B); oil production phase with in situ OCA (C) and those contacted to ex situ OCA, post-oil production (D) were analyzed for vibrations characteristic to the lipids
Transmittance in FTIR spectra of the intact cells
| Phase | Peak (cm−1) | Intensity (%T) | Area | Vibration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil production phase (without OCA) | 1024.2 | 77.78 | 17.57 | OCH2 deformation |
| 1625.99 | 88.66 | 4.68 | C=C/asymmetric COO− stretching | |
| 2920.33 | 93.55 | 2.88 | CH2 stretching (lipid acyl chain) | |
| 3267.41 | 91.7 | 15.62 | C=O stretching overtone | |
| Oil production phase (with in situ OCA) | 1031.92 | 92.6 | 3.65 | OCH2 deformation |
| 1627.92 | 94.06 | 2.56 | C=C/asymmetric COO− stretching | |
| 2920.23 | 94.51 | 2.42 | CH2 stretching (lipid acyl chain) | |
| 3267.41 | 92.38 | 6.74 | C=O stretching overtone |
Distribution of microbial oil in the fermentation broth
| Phase | Intracellular oil in the cells (g/L) | Extracellular oil in the broth (g/L) |
|---|---|---|
| Growth phase | 1.5 | 0.1 |
| Oil production phase | 3.15 | 2 |
| Oil production phase with in situ OCA | 5.4 | 2 |
| Post-production ex situ capture of oil | 2.5 | 0 |
Fig. 5Time profiles for glucose assimilation and oil production in a two-stage production process. Oil production by Yarrowia lipolytica NCIM 3590 was carried out in a 2 L fermenter; a without and b with in situ OCA, to understand its effect on oil yield, oil titre, lipid content and glucose uptake
Fig. 6Kinetics of glucose assimilation and oil production by Yarrowia lipolytica in a two-stage system. The glucose uptake rate (a) and oil production rate/productivity (b) were studied over 3 days in the oil production broth with different glucose concentrations
Fig. 7Effect of OCA addition on glucose assimilation and oil production kinetics. a Glucose assimilation rate and b oil productivity at different glucose concentrations in the presence of an oil capturing agent (OCA), was studied for 3 days
Fig. 8A schematic diagram for microbial oil production and its online capture. The oil production broth from the fermenter was pumped out to continuously fluidize an external OCA bed while the flow-through was recycled back into the fermenter to achieve simultaneous production and online oil capture
Fig. 9Semi-continuous mode for microbial oil production with an on-line oil capture. The residual glucose, lipid content and oil yield on glucose consumed was studied over 5 cycles of continuous production and on-line oil capture. Each cycle of 72 h was followed with fed-batch addition of glucose (to adjust the glucose concentration to 5% v/v) and regeneration of OCA bed for its reuse in the subsequent cycle. Same cells were used throughout the 378 h operation (5 cycles)
Fig. 10Distribution of microbial oil in a production system with continuous on-line oil capture. Oil production and its distribution in intracellular, extracellular and resin-bound forms in each cycle of continuous production and on-line oil capture was studied
Comparison of different strategies used for oil production by oleaginous yeasts using glucose as a C-source
| Strain | Culture conditions | Oil productivity (g L−1 h−1) | Oil yield ( | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Batch fermentation—N limiting; pO2 controlled (with 50% air saturation) | 0.15 | 0.15 | [ | |
|
| Systematic engineering in | 0.104a | 0.23a | [ |
| Metabolic flux pulling and in situ addition of 15% (v/v) dodecane at shake flask scale | 0.14a | 0.20 | [ | |
| Cultivation in NaCl-enriched glucose-based media for yeast adaptation | 0.075a | 0.21 | [ | |
|
| Shake flask culturing for 96 h; Strain adapted by successive cultivations in increasing concentrations of SCBH | 0.106 ± 0.005 | 0.20 | [ |
| Fed-batch glucose addition to an optimized media to maintain C/N | 0.26a | 0.147a | [ | |
|
| Two-stage fermentation with 5% glucose as sole carbon and nutrient source | 0.066a | 0.15 ± 0.02 | [ |
| Batch cultivation in shaking tubes with 7.5% (v/v) dodecane | 0.019a | 0.25a | [ | |
| 10% Glucose in nitrogen-limited mineral medium with high inoculum size | 0.28a | 0.20a | [ | |
| Fermentation with Excess O2 in a media with C/N 75.3 | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.21 | [ | |
| Engineered cytosolic redox metabolism; Cultured in a high density fed-batch fermentation | 1.3 | 0.269 | [ | |
| Pre-culture followed by batch fermentation with 4% glucose as a sole carbon/nutrient source | 0.024a | 0.088 | [ | |
| Sole glucose batch fermentation; in situ enzymatic cell wall hydrolysis for intracellular oil recovery | 0.09 | nd | [ | |
| Lipid production under low C/N ratio (17.9) by high cell density cultivation | nd | 0.13 | [ | |
| Batch fermentation with 16% glucose in minimal medium followed by Switchable solvent extraction (DMCHA, EB, DP) from wet cells | 0.099a | 0.1a | [ | |
| Two-stage microbial oil production with in situ oil capturing agents (OCA); Batch fermentation 72 h; 5% glucose | 0.166 | 0.33 | Present study | |
| Oil production with continuous on-line oil capture for 378 h; Fed-batch (5% glucose) addition and OCA regeneration for 5 cycles of 72 h each | 0.041 | 0.33 | Present study |
nd no data reported
aValues calculated on the basis of data reported
EGenetically modified strain
AAdapted strain
Fig. 11GC–MS characterization of microbial oil. The fatty acid composition profile of the a intracellular, b adsorbed and c extracellular microbial oil has been studied and compared