| Literature DB >> 33088345 |
Kukkala Kiran Kumar1, Farha Deeba1, Yuvraj Singh Negi2, Naseem A Gaur1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To meet the present transportation demands and solve food versus fuel issue, microbial lipid-derived biofuels are gaining attention worldwide. This study is focussed on high-throughput screening of oleaginous yeast by microwave-aided Nile red spectrofluorimetry and exploring pongamia shell hydrolysate (PSH) as a feedstock for lipid production using novel oleaginous yeast Rhodotorula pacifica INDKK.Entities:
Keywords: Biodiesel; Microwave-aided Nile red screening; Pongamia shell hydrolysate; Rhodotorula pacifica INDKK; Triacylglycerol
Year: 2020 PMID: 33088345 PMCID: PMC7574204 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-020-01814-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Phylogenetic tree of Rhodotorula pacifica INDKK (Acc. No. MN560184) showing evolutionary history constructed by MEGA X software using the maximum likelihood method. Bootstrap values greater than 50% are represented as numbers above the branches
Fig. 2a RFU values of (1) Y. lipolytica as control, (2) R. toruloides (NCIM-3641), (3) R. pacifica INDKK, (4) R. kratochvilovae (MTCC-248), (5) R. rubra (NCIM-3260), (6) R. glutinis (NCIM-3168), (7) R. dibovatum (NCIM-3658) from Nile red spectrofluorimetry. b Comparison of DCW (g/L), lipid titre (g/L) and lipid content (% w/w) of six selected strains with (1) Y. lipolytica as control, (2) R. toruloides (NCIM-3641), (3) R. pacifica INDKK, (4) R. kratochvilovae (MTCC-248), (5) R. rubra (NCIM-3260), (6) R. glutinis (NCIM-3168), (7) R. dibovatum (NCIM-3658) after 72 h (one-way ANOVA test, P < 0.05). c Correlation plot showing liner correlation between lipid titres (g/L) from gravimetric analysis and RFU values of S. cerevisiae, Y. lipolytica (NCIM-3590), R. toruloides (NCIM-3641), R. pacifica INDKK, R. kratochvilovae (MTCC-248), R. rubra (NCIM-3260), R. glutinis (NCIM-3168) and R. dibovatum (NCIM-3658)
Fig. 3Time-course study of DCW, lipid titre and glucose consumption by selected oleaginous yeasts in YNB medium. a R. toruloides (NCIM-3641); b lab isolate R. pacifica INDKK; c R. kratochvilovae (MTCC-247); d R. rubra (NCIM-3560) (one-way ANOVA test, P < 0.05)
Fig. 4a Growth study of R. pacifica INDKK in different C6, C5 and C3 carbon sources and tolerance study in pre-treatment-generated inhibitors; b 5-HMF; c furfural and d acetic acid
The pongamia shell hydrolysate (PSH) nutrient composition before and after consumption by Rhodotorula pacifica INDKK
| Component | PS (dry) | Before cultivation | After cultivation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellulose (%) | 12 | – | – |
| Holocellulose (%) | 56.8 | – | – |
| Xylan (%) | 8 | – | – |
| Glucose (g/L) | – | 28.05 ± 0.01 | – |
| Xylose (g/L) | – | 18.13 ± 0.04 | 0.05 ± 0.08 |
| Arabinose (g/L) | – | 0.29 ± 0.01 | – |
| Total proteins (g/L) | – | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.005 |
| Total nitrogen (g/L) | 1.90 | 0.053 ± 0.01 | 0.037 ± 0.02 |
| Calcium (mg/L) | – | 107 ± 0.87 | 6.3 ± 2.28 |
| Sodium (g/L) | – | 1.08 ± 0.15 | 0.84 ± 0.28 |
| Magnesium (g/L) | – | 1.53 ± 0.003 | 0.22 ± 0.06 |
| Phosphorous (g/L) | 2.05 | 1.51 ± 0.001 | 0.36 ± 0.12 |
| Potassium (g/L) | 6.32 | 1.53 ± 0.005 | 0.38 ± 0.12 |
| Manganese (mg/L) | – | 0.37 ± 0.05 | 0.24 ± 0.07 |
| Iron (mg/L) | – | 0.067 ± 0.009 | 0.036 ± 0.021 |
| Sulphur (g/L) | 0.276 | – | – |
| 5-HMF (g/L) | – | 0.013 ± 0.005 | 0.01 ± 0.01 |
| Acetic acid (g/L) | – | 0.046 ± 0.01 | – |
– not detected.
Fig. 5Panel: 1 Time-course study of DCW, lipid titre and sugar consumption by R. pacifica INDKK in a AD-PSH b AS-PSH and c control (YNB) (one-way ANOVA test, P < 0.05). Panel: 2 Confocal microscopy of R. pacifica INDKK cells cultivated in a AD-PSH, b AS-PSH, and c control (YNB) after 120 h showing average LD size and cell size at 100×
Comparative FAME profile and biodiesel properties of R. pacifica INDKK cultivated in PSH and YNB
| Fatty acid/biodiesel properties | Rape seed oil methyl ester [ | Jatropha oil methyl ester [ | AD-PSH | AS-PSH | Control (YNB) | EN 14214 | ASTM D6751 | IS 15607 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C14:0 (%) | ND | ND | ND | 0.89 | 0.55 | – | – | – |
| C16:0 (%) | 11.9 | 14.9 | 14.45 | 28.85 | 10.4 | – | – | – |
| C16:1 (%) | ND | 1 | ND | ND | ND | – | – | – |
| C18:0 (%) | 4.1 | 6.1 | 6.13 | ND | ND | – | – | – |
| C18:1 (%) | 20.8 | 40.4 | 61.98 | 52.58 | 43.61 | – | – | – |
| C18:2 (%) | 53.8 | 36.2 | 16.86 | 12.45 | ND | – | – | – |
| C18:3 (%) | 9.3 | 0.3 | ND | 1.37 | ND | – | – | – |
| C20:0 (%) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | – | – | – |
| C22:0 (%) | ND | ND | ND | 0.46 | ND | – | – | – |
| C24:0 (%) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | – | – | – |
| Iodine value (IV) (g of I2/100 g) | 107.76 | 98.02 | 86.29 | 73.58 | 39.02 | 120 (max.) | – | – |
| Cetane number (CN) | 54.35 | 55.23 | 53.92 | 56.72 | 86.86 | 47 | 51 | 51 |
| High heating value (HHV) (MJ/kg) | 40.78 | 40.55 | 39.42 | 38.14 | 21.56 | – | – | – |
| Density (g/cm3) | 0.80 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.47 | – | 0.86–0.90 | 0.86–0.89 |
| Kinematic viscosity (KV) (mm2/s) | 4.4 | 4.48 | 3.90 | 3.7 | 2.13 | 1.9–6 | 3.5–5 | 2.5–6 |
| Cold filter plugging point (CFPP) | ND | ND | −6.1 | −5.97 | −13.2 | – | – | – |
– No standard limit designated by biodiesel standards ASTM D6751, EN 14214 and IS 15607; ND not detected.
Biodiesel production from R. pacifica INDKK using PS as substrate
| Pongamia shell powder used (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCW produced (g /L) | Lipids produced (g/L) | Biodiesel produced (g/L) | Transesterification efficiency (%) | |
| 20 | 12.8 | 6.8 | 6.24 | 91.77 |
Comparative study of R. pacifica INDKK with different oleaginous yeasts grown in lignocellulosic biomass
| Strain | Substrate | Biomass (g/L) | Lipid titre (g/L) | Lipid content (%) | Lipid productivity (g/L/h) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saccharified sweet sorghum | 15.51 | 1.8 | 11.6 | 0.020 | [ | |
| Acid treated and saccharified waste office paper hydrolysate | 11.48 | 4.95 | 43.11 | 0.041 | [ | |
| Ammonium carbonate-steam explosion pre-treated and saccharified corn stover | 10.56 | 5.03 | 47.6 | 0.029 | [ | |
| Lime treated and saccharified sorghum bagasse hydrolysate | 6 | 2.6 | 43.3 | 0.021 | [ | |
| YNB | 12.26 | 6.61 | 54.24 | 0.055 | This study | |
| Acid treated and detoxified PSH | 10.63 | 4.48 | 42.14 | 0.037 | This study | |
| Alkali treated and saccharified PSH | 12.56 | 7.02 | 55.89 | 0.058 | This study |