| Literature DB >> 31623682 |
Ciara H O'Flanagan1, Kieran R Campbell1,2,3, Allen W Zhang1,4,5, Farhia Kabeer1,6, Jamie L P Lim7, Justina Biele1, Peter Eirew1, Daniel Lai1, Andrew McPherson1,7, Esther Kong1, Cherie Bates1, Kelly Borkowski1, Matt Wiens1, Brittany Hewitson1, James Hopkins1, Jenifer Pham1, Nicholas Ceglia4, Richard Moore8, Andrew J Mungall8, Jessica N McAlpine9, Sohrab P Shah10,11,12, Samuel Aparicio13,14.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a powerful tool for studying complex biological systems, such as tumor heterogeneity and tissue microenvironments. However, the sources of technical and biological variation in primary solid tumor tissues and patient-derived mouse xenografts for scRNA-seq are not well understood.Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; Gene expression; Ovarian cancer; Quality control; RNA-seq; Single cell; Tissue dissociation; Tumor microenvironment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31623682 PMCID: PMC6796327 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-019-1830-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Biol ISSN: 1474-7596 Impact factor: 13.583
Fig. 1Overview of 48 single-cell experiments generated in this study. a Schematic showing the various substrates used to generate the 48 single-cell experiments in this dataset. b Descriptions of the cell status, substrate, cancer type, dissociation temperature, and tissue state of each sample in the dataset. c Substantial variability in three key QC metrics (number of genes detected, percentage of counts mapping to the mitochondrial genome, number of UMIs sequenced) across all experiments. d Embedding of all 48 single-cell experiments to a low-dimensional projection with uniform manifold approximation and projection [12]
Fig. 2Transcriptomic landscape of live, dead, and dying cells. a FACS analysis showing gating strategy for untreated, live cells (PI−/annexin V−) or TNFα-treated dying cells (PI/annexin V+) and dead cells (PI+/annexin V+). b PCA projection of the three cell conditions showing approximate segregation of cell status along the first principal component (PC1), with live and dying cells enriched at lower PC1 values and dead cells enriched at higher values. c PCA projection colored by the percentage mitochondrial genes (“% transcriptome mitochondrial”) shows significant increase along the PC1. d Dead cells exhibit significantly higher percentage of the transcriptome as mitochondrial compared to both live and dying cells. e Unsupervised clustering of the gene expression profiles clusters the cells into three groups, approximately tracking both PC1 of the data and the percentage of transcriptome mitochondrial. f The composition of each cluster demonstrates that cluster 1 is primarily composed of live cells and cluster 2 a mix of live, dying, and dead cells, while cluster 3 is composed mainly of dead cells. g The percentage of transcriptome mitochondrial is significantly different between the three clusters, with a step increase in proportion moving from cluster 1 to 2 and 2 to 3. h Cluster 2 significantly upregulates the MHC class I gene set, suggesting it represents stressed or pre-apoptotic cells. i Differential expression analysis of transcriptomically “healthy” cells within cluster 1 reveals residual differences between cells sorted as live and dead. j The distribution of absolute effect sizes (log fold change) of live vs. dead cells within cluster 1 (x-axis) compared to between clusters 1 and 2 (y-axis) demonstrates the residual effect on the transcriptome of being live/dead sorted is small compared to the inter-cluster expression variance
Fig. 3Dissociation with collagenase at 37 °C induces a distinct stress response in 23,731 cells from PDX samples that is minimized by dissociation at 6 °C. a The top 40 genes (by log fold change) from the 11,975 identified as significantly differentially expressed between cells digested at 6 °C and 37 °C. b UMAP plots of 23,731 cells colored by digestion temperature (top) then by normalized expression of three key stress response genes (FOS, JUNB, NR4A1) demonstrate a distinct concordance between temperature and induction of the stress gene signature. Expression values are log normalized counts winsorized to [0, 2) then scaled to [0, 1). c Pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes with the MSigDB hallmark gene sets highlights induction of genes involved in NF-κB signaling at 37 °C digestion with 46.5% of 200 genes annotated in the pathway being found in the 512 core gene set
Fig. 4Disentangling the effects of digestion time and digestion method on transcriptomic response. a Mean normalized expression of genes in the core gene set as a function of digestion time colored by digestion temperature. Digestion by collagenase causes upregulation of the gene set at all time points, with a subset showing further upregulation as digestion time increases. B Log fold changes of a 2-h vs. 30-min digestion for collagenase only as a function of log counts-per-million. c Log fold changes of a collagenase vs. cold protease digestion at 30-min digestion time as a function of log counts-per-million. d Log fold changes of a collagenase vs. cold protease digestion at 2-h digestion time as a function of log counts-per-million. e Log fold changes of a 2-h vs. 30-min digestion (collagenase only) compared to a collagenase vs. cold protease digestion at 2 h demonstrate a large overlap between genes affected (ρ = 0.8)
Fig. 5Conserved stress response to the collagenase dissociation method in breast and ovarian patient tissues. a Histology of ovarian (top) and breast (bottom) cancer patient samples highlighting the architecture of the tumor microenvironment. b FACS analysis of ovarian tumor tissue dissociated at 37 °C with collagenase or 6 °C with cold active protease and stained with markers for tumor cells (EpCAM), endothelial cells (CD31), fibroblasts (FAP), lymphocytes (CD45), B cells (CD19), NK cells (CD56), and T cells (CD8, CD3). c UMAP of combined scRNA-seq experiments of ovarian cancer (n = 2) and breast cancer (n = 3) patient tissues with cell type assignments according to known gene markers for each cell type. d The top 40 genes from the gene set derived in Fig. 3 as expressed in each cell type in breast and ovarian patient samples. Black circles around points denote significance at 5% FDR. e Pathway analysis of the differential expression results with the MSigDB hallmark gene sets for each cell type