Literature DB >> 34964891

Active Working Memory and Simple Cognitive Operations.

Johanna Kreither1,2, Orestis Papaioannou1, Steven J Luck1.   

Abstract

Working memory is thought to serve as a buffer for ongoing cognitive operations, even in tasks that have no obvious memory requirements. This conceptualization has been supported by dual-task experiments, in which interference is observed between a primary task involving short-term memory storage and a secondary task that presumably requires the same buffer as the primary task. Little or no interference is typically observed when the secondary task is very simple. Here, we test the hypothesis that even very simple tasks require the working memory buffer, but interference can be minimized by using activity-silent representations to store the information from the primary task. We tested this hypothesis using dual-task paradigm in which a simple discrimination task was interposed in the retention interval of a change detection task. We used contralateral delay activity (CDA) to track the active maintenance of information for the change detection task. We found that the CDA was massively disrupted after the interposed task. Despite this disruption of active maintenance, we found that performance in the change detection task was only slightly impaired, suggesting that activity-silent representations were used to retain the information for the change detection task. A second experiment replicated this result and also showed that automated discriminations could be performed without producing a large CDA disruption. Together, these results suggest that simple but non-automated discrimination tasks require the same processes that underlie active maintenance of information in working memory.
© 2021 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34964891      PMCID: PMC8764741          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  69 in total

1.  ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: time course and scalp distribution.

Authors:  S Bentin; Y Mouchetant-Rostaing; M H Giard; J F Echallier; J Pernier
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  The focus of attention as observed in visual working memory tasks: making sense of competing claims.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink.

Authors:  Charles L Folk; Andrew B Leber; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-07

4.  Homologous mechanisms of visuospatial working memory maintenance in macaque and human: properties and sources.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Richard P Heitz; Braden A Purcell; Pauline K Weigand; Jeffrey D Schall; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Ashleigh M Maxcey-Richard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory: Evidence from attentive tracking and visual working memory paradigms.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; René Marois
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-06

Review 7.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory.

Authors:  H Pashler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  A central capacity limit to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays in working memory.

Authors:  J Scott Saults; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

9.  Do small dual-task costs reflect ideomotor compatibility or the absence of crosstalk?

Authors:  Kimberly M Halvorson; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

10.  Dynamic coding for cognitive control in prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Mark G Stokes; Makoto Kusunoki; Natasha Sigala; Hamed Nili; David Gaffan; John Duncan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.