| Literature DB >> 31616504 |
Zhiyu Dong1, Junwen Wang1, Haiqin Zhang1, Tingting Zhan1, Ying Chen1, Shuchang Xu1.
Abstract
Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is the predominant pathological subtype of esophageal cancer in Europe and the USA. The present bioinformatics study analyzed a high-throughput sequencing dataset, GSE94869, to determine differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in order to identify key genes, biological processes and pathways associated with EAC. Functional enrichment analysis was performed using the Database for Annotation Visualization and Integrated Discovery. The co-expression network of the DEGs was established using Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis and visualized using Cytoscape. A Kaplan-Meier analysis based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was used to identify prognosis-associated genes. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify genes with a prognostic value regarding relapse-free survival (RFS), while validation of the differential expression of prognosis-associated genes was performed using a box plot based on data from TCGA and another microarray dataset, GSE26886. A total of 130 DEGs, comprising 82 upregulated and 48 downregulated genes, were identified. The upregulated DEGs were significantly associated with extracellular matrix organization, disassembly, and the phosphoinositide-3 kinase/AKT, Rap1 and Ras signaling pathways, while the downregulated genes were associated with the Wnt signalling pathway. Subsequently, two co-expression modules were established and 20 hub genes were identified. The blue module was associated with the Rap1 signaling pathway, while the turquoise module was associated with the Ras and Rap1 signaling pathways. Among them, methyltransferase like 7B (METTL7B) was associated with RFS. Furthermore, the overexpression of METTL7B in EAC was successfully validated using data from TCGA and GSE26886. The present study identified key genes and provides potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of EAC. Copyright: © Dong et al.Entities:
Keywords: Cox proportional hazards model; Kaplan-Meier analysis; Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis; differential expression genes; esophageal adenocarcinoma; functional enrichment analysis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31616504 PMCID: PMC6781836 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.7973
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
GO terms in the category biological process and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways significantly enriched by the differentially expressed genes in esophageal adenocarcinoma.
| Term/pathway | Description | Enriched genes (n) | Adjusted P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upregulated | |||
| GO:0030198 | Extracellular matrix organization | 12 | 9.43×10−7 |
| GO:0035987 | Endodermal cell differentiation | 5 | 2.92×10−3 |
| GO:0030168 | Platelet activation | 7 | 3.95×10−3 |
| GO:0007596 | Blood coagulation | 8 | 4.23×10−3 |
| GO:0022617 | Extracellular matrix disassembly | 6 | 4.33×10−3 |
| GO:0048013 | Ephrin receptor signaling pathway | 6 | 6.57×10−3 |
| hsa04510 | Focal adhesion | 13 | 7.58×10−6 |
| hsa04151 | PI3K-Akt signaling pathway | 14 | 1.53×10−4 |
| hsa04611 | Platelet activation | 8 | 1.69×10−3 |
| hsa05200 | Pathways in cancer | 13 | 1.70×10−3 |
| hsa04015 | Rap1 signaling pathway | 10 | 1.74×10−3 |
| hsa04014 | Ras signaling pathway | 10 | 1.86×10−3 |
| hsa05146 | Amoebiasis | 7 | 3.78×10−3 |
| hsa04071 | Sphingolipid signaling pathway | 7 | 6.50×10−3 |
| hsa04512 | ECM-receptor interaction | 6 | 9.85×10−3 |
| Downregulated | |||
| GO:0045165 | Cell fate commitment | 5 | 1.69×10−3 |
| GO:0030182 | Neuron differentiation | 6 | 2.03×10−3 |
| GO:0060070 | Canonical Wnt signaling pathway | 6 | 2.09×10−3 |
| GO:0000122 | Negative regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter | 11 | 3.38×10−3 |
| hsa04550 | Signaling pathways regulating pluripotency of stem cells | 9 | 1.39×10−5 |
| hsa04310 | Wnt signaling pathway | 6 | 9.79×10−3 |
GO, Gene Ontology; hsa, Homo sapiens; ECM, extracellular matrix; PI3K, phosphoinositide-3 kinase.
Figure 1.Co-expression network of the blue module identified by WGCNA. The colour spectrum illustrates the degree of connectivity of the nodes, with red indicating the highest degree of connectivity and turquoise the lowest degree of connectivity. The nodes with a larger size represent hub genes among the top 10 with the highest network connectivity degree. WGCNA, Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis.
Figure 2.Co-expression network of the turquoise module identified by WGCNA. The colour spectrum illustrates the degree of connectivity of the nodes, with red indicating the highest degree of connectivity and turquoise the lowest degree of connectivity. The nodes with a larger size represent hub genes among the top 10 with the highest network connectivity degree. WGCNA, Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis.
Significantly enriched GO terms in the category biological process and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways in the different co-expression modules.
| Term or pathway | Description | Enriched genes (n) | Adjusted P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Module blue | |||
| hsa04015 | Rap1 signaling pathway | 5 | 4.10×10−2 |
| hsa04916 | Melanogenesis | 4 | 4.28×10−2 |
| hsa04725 | Cholinergic synapse | 4 | 4.31×10−2 |
| hsa04540 | Gap junction | 4 | 4.46×10−2 |
| hsa05143 | African trypanosomiasis | 3 | 4.54×10−2 |
| hsa04071 | Sphingolipid signaling pathway | 4 | 4.59×10−2 |
| hsa04918 | Thyroid hormone synthesis | 4 | 4.61×10−2 |
| hsa04915 | Estrogen signaling pathway | 4 | 4.67×10−2 |
| hsa04270 | Vascular smooth muscle contraction | 4 | 4.82×10−2 |
| hsa04911 | Insulin secretion | 4 | 4.84×10−2 |
| Module turquoise | |||
| GO:0045669 | Positive regulation of osteoblast differentiation | 5 | 1.48×10−2 |
| GO:0048013 | ephrin receptor signaling pathway | 5 | 3.04×10−2 |
| hsa04014 | Ras signaling pathway | 9 | 3.09×10−4 |
| hsa05200 | Pathways in cancer | 10 | 7.90×10−4 |
| hsa04550 | Signaling pathways regulating pluripotency of stem cells | 7 | 1.05×10−3 |
| hsa05205 | Proteoglycans in cancer | 7 | 3.84×10−3 |
| hsa04810 | Regulation of actin cytoskeleton | 7 | 4.12×10−3 |
| hsa05166 | HTLV–I infection | 7 | 9.65×10−3 |
| hsa04360 | Axon guidance | 5 | 1.93×10−2 |
| hsa04015 | Rap1 signaling pathway | 6 | 1.99×10−2 |
| hsa04510 | Focal adhesion | 6 | 2.09×10−2 |
| hsa04310 | Wnt signaling pathway | 5 | 2.35×10−2 |
| hsa04151 | PI3K-Akt signaling pathway | 7 | 2.43×10−2 |
GO, Gene Ontology; hsa, Homo sapiens; PI3K, phosphoinositide-3 kinase; HTLV, human T-lymphotropic virus.
Figure 3.Prognostic value of METTL7B for relapse-free survival of EAC patients. EAC patients were divided into low and high expression groups according to the median expression level. EAC, esophageal adenocarcinoma; METTL7B, methyltransferase like 7B.
Univariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of parameters affecting relapse-free survival.
| Parameter | n | HR (95% CI) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (≤65 vs. >65 years) | 29:32 | 0.93 (0.47–1.83) | 0.825 |
| History of alcohol use (yes vs. no) | 10:50 | 0.59 (0.25–1.36) | 0.215 |
| History of Barrett's esophagus (yes vs. no) | 37:17 | 1.03 (0.48–2.22) | 0.936 |
| Location of lesion (mid vs. distal) | 5:56 | 0.73 (0.21–2.45) | 0.605 |
| Pathologic N-stage (0/1 vs. 2/3) | 38:9 | 2.07 (0.79–5.43) | 0.140 |
| Pathologic T-stage (1/2 vs. 3/4) | 26:21 | 1.41 (0.59–3.37) | 0.435 |
| Pathologic TNM stage (1/2 vs. 3/4) | 26:18 | 2.37 (0.98–5.72) | 0.056 |
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Risk of recurrence for each quartile of methyltransferase like 7B expression levels.
| Calculation | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | P-value for trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range | 6.39–8.17 | 8.18–9.01 | 9.04–9.49 | 9.5–10.62 | |
| Patients, n | 16 | 15 | 14 | 16 | |
| Model 1, HR (95% CI) | Ref | 2.78 (0.74–10.53) | 6.46 (1.78–23.38) | 4.16 (1.16–14.96) | |
| P-value | 0.131 | 0.005 | 0.029 | 0.013 | |
| (No. of patients) | (n=13) | (n=11) | (n=7) | (n=12) | |
| Model 2 (HR (95% CI)) | Ref | 2.18 (0.52–9.12) | 4.62 (1.08–19.75) | 2.9 (0.76–11.08) | |
| P-value | 0.287 | 0.039 | 0.12 | 0.092 |
Range, expression level range in each quartile; Model 1, crude data with no adjustment; Model 2, adjustment for pathological TNM stage and N stage; Q, quartile. P-value for trend, P-value of cox proportional hazard regression analysis of METTL7B expression level transformed into ordered categorical variable affecting relapse-free survival. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. HR (95% CI), HR and CI compared with Q1 group as METTL7B expression level transformed into unordered categorical variable. Ref, reference.
Figure 4.Validation of differential expression of METTL7B in EAC. (A) Expression level of METTL7B in EAC (n=8) and normal epithelium tissues (n=8) based on data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. (B) Expression level of METTL7B in EAC (n=21) and normal epithelium tissues (n=19) based on data from the microarray dataset GSE26886. In the box plot, the boxes indicate the median and interquartile range of data, while the error bars represent the minimum and maximum values. The data points display the exact numerical expression level for each sample. EAC, esophageal adenocarcinoma; METTL7B, methyltransferase like 7B.