Zhixiong Wang1,2, Yulan Cheng2,3, John M Abraham2,3, Rong Yan2, Xi Liu2, Wei Chen1, Sariat Ibrahim2,3, Gary P Schroth4, Xiquan Ke2, Yulong He1, Stephen J Meltzer2,3,5. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China. 2. Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Department of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Core Applications Group, Illumina, Incorporated, San Diego, California. 5. Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies of chromosomal rearrangements and fusion transcripts have elucidated mechanisms of tumorigenesis and led to targeted cancer therapies. This study was aimed at identifying novel fusion transcripts in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). METHODS: To identify new fusion transcripts associated with EAC, targeted RNA sequencing and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) verification were performed in 40 EACs and matched nonmalignant specimens from the same patients. Genomic PCR and Sanger sequencing were performed to find the breakpoint of fusion genes. RESULTS: Five novel in-frame fusion transcripts were identified and verified in 40 EACs and in a validation cohort of 15 additional EACs (55 patients in all): fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2)-GRB2-associated binding protein 2 (GAB2) in 2 of 55 or 3.6%, Niemann-Pick C1 (NPC1)-maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase (MELK) in 2 of 55 or 3.6%, ubiquitin-specific peptidase 54 (USP54)-calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II γ (CAMK2G) in 2 of 55 or 3.6%, megakaryoblastic leukemia (translocation) 1 (MKL1)-fibulin 1 (FBLN1) in 1 of 55 or 1.8%, and CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 2 (CNOT2)-chromosome 12 open reading frame 49 (C12orf49) in 1 of 55 or 1.8%. A genomic analysis indicated that NPC1-MELK arose from a complex interchromosomal translocation event involving chromosomes 18, 3, and 9 with 3 rearrangement points, and this was consistent with chromoplexy. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that fusion transcripts occur at a stable frequency in EAC. Furthermore, our results indicate that chromoplexy is an underlying mechanism that generates fusion transcripts in EAC. These and other fusion transcripts merit further study as diagnostic markers and potential therapeutic targets in EAC. Cancer 2017;123:3916-24.
BACKGROUND: Studies of chromosomal rearrangements and fusion transcripts have elucidated mechanisms of tumorigenesis and led to targeted cancer therapies. This study was aimed at identifying novel fusion transcripts in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). METHODS: To identify new fusion transcripts associated with EAC, targeted RNA sequencing and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) verification were performed in 40 EACs and matched nonmalignant specimens from the same patients. Genomic PCR and Sanger sequencing were performed to find the breakpoint of fusion genes. RESULTS: Five novel in-frame fusion transcripts were identified and verified in 40 EACs and in a validation cohort of 15 additional EACs (55 patients in all): fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2)-GRB2-associated binding protein 2 (GAB2) in 2 of 55 or 3.6%, Niemann-Pick C1 (NPC1)-maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase (MELK) in 2 of 55 or 3.6%, ubiquitin-specific peptidase 54 (USP54)-calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II γ (CAMK2G) in 2 of 55 or 3.6%, megakaryoblastic leukemia (translocation) 1 (MKL1)-fibulin 1 (FBLN1) in 1 of 55 or 1.8%, and CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 2 (CNOT2)-chromosome 12 open reading frame 49 (C12orf49) in 1 of 55 or 1.8%. A genomic analysis indicated that NPC1-MELK arose from a complex interchromosomal translocation event involving chromosomes 18, 3, and 9 with 3 rearrangement points, and this was consistent with chromoplexy. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that fusion transcripts occur at a stable frequency in EAC. Furthermore, our results indicate that chromoplexy is an underlying mechanism that generates fusion transcripts in EAC. These and other fusion transcripts merit further study as diagnostic markers and potential therapeutic targets in EAC. Cancer 2017;123:3916-24.
Authors: Linetta B Koppert; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Herman van Dekken; Hugo W Tilanus; Winand N M Dinjens Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2005-12-01 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Daniela Sia; Bojan Losic; Agrin Moeini; Laia Cabellos; Ke Hao; Kate Revill; Dennis Bonal; Oriana Miltiadous; Zhongyang Zhang; Yujin Hoshida; Helena Cornella; Mireia Castillo-Martin; Roser Pinyol; Yumi Kasai; Sasan Roayaie; Swan N Thung; Josep Fuster; Myron E Schwartz; Samuel Waxman; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Eric Schadt; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Josep M Llovet Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Andrew E Blum; Srividya Venkitachalam; Yan Guo; Ann Marie Kieber-Emmons; Lakshmeswari Ravi; Apoorva K Chandar; Prasad G Iyer; Marcia I Canto; Jean S Wang; Nicholas J Shaheen; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Sanford D Markowitz; Joseph E Willis; Yu Shyr; Amitabh Chak; Vinay Varadan; Kishore Guda Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Philip J Stephens; Chris D Greenman; Beiyuan Fu; Fengtang Yang; Graham R Bignell; Laura J Mudie; Erin D Pleasance; King Wai Lau; David Beare; Lucy A Stebbings; Stuart McLaren; Meng-Lay Lin; David J McBride; Ignacio Varela; Serena Nik-Zainal; Catherine Leroy; Mingming Jia; Andrew Menzies; Adam P Butler; Jon W Teague; Michael A Quail; John Burton; Harold Swerdlow; Nigel P Carter; Laura A Morsberger; Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue; George A Follows; Anthony R Green; Adrienne M Flanagan; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal; Peter J Campbell Journal: Cell Date: 2011-01-07 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Austin M Dulak; Petar Stojanov; Shouyong Peng; Michael S Lawrence; Cameron Fox; Chip Stewart; Santhoshi Bandla; Yu Imamura; Steven E Schumacher; Erica Shefler; Aaron McKenna; Scott L Carter; Kristian Cibulskis; Andrey Sivachenko; Gordon Saksena; Douglas Voet; Alex H Ramos; Daniel Auclair; Kristin Thompson; Carrie Sougnez; Robert C Onofrio; Candace Guiducci; Rameen Beroukhim; Zhongren Zhou; Lin Lin; Jules Lin; Rishindra Reddy; Andrew Chang; Rodney Landrenau; Arjun Pennathur; Shuji Ogino; James D Luketich; Todd R Golub; Stacey B Gabriel; Eric S Lander; David G Beer; Tony E Godfrey; Gad Getz; Adam J Bass Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2013-03-24 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Kathleen Schoofs; Annouck Philippron; Piet Pattyn; Katleen De Preter; Francisco Avila Cobos; Jan Koster; Steve Lefever; Jasper Anckaert; Danny De Looze; Jo Vandesompele Journal: Sci Data Date: 2022-03-14 Impact factor: 8.501
Authors: Mai K L Nguyen; Jaimy Jose; Mohamed Wahba; Marc Bernaus-Esqué; Andrew J Hoy; Carlos Enrich; Carles Rentero; Thomas Grewal Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-06-29 Impact factor: 6.208