Literature DB >> 31612567

Blind prediction of homo- and hetero-protein complexes: The CASP13-CAPRI experiment.

Marc F Lensink1, Guillaume Brysbaert1, Nurul Nadzirin2, Sameer Velankar2, Raphaël A G Chaleil3, Tereza Gerguri3, Paul A Bates3, Elodie Laine4, Alessandra Carbone4,5, Sergei Grudinin6, Ren Kong7, Ran-Ran Liu7, Xi-Ming Xu7, Hang Shi7, Shan Chang7, Miriam Eisenstein8, Agnieszka Karczynska9, Cezary Czaplewski9, Emilia Lubecka10, Agnieszka Lipska9, Paweł Krupa11, Magdalena Mozolewska12, Łukasz Golon9, Sergey Samsonov9, Adam Liwo9,13, Silvia Crivelli14, Guillaume Pagès6, Mikhail Karasikov15, Maria Kadukova6,16, Yumeng Yan17, Sheng-You Huang17, Mireia Rosell18,19, Luis A Rodríguez-Lumbreras18,19, Miguel Romero-Durana18, Lucía Díaz-Bueno18, Juan Fernandez-Recio18,19,20, Charles Christoffer21, Genki Terashi22, Woong-Hee Shin22, Tunde Aderinwale21, Sai Raghavendra Maddhuri Venkata Subraman21, Daisuke Kihara21, Dima Kozakov23, Sandor Vajda24,25, Kathryn Porter24, Dzmitry Padhorny23, Israel Desta24, Dmitri Beglov24, Mikhail Ignatov23, Sergey Kotelnikov16,23, Iain H Moal2, David W Ritchie26, Isaure Chauvot de Beauchêne26, Bernard Maigret26, Marie-Dominique Devignes26, Maria E Ruiz Echartea26, Didier Barradas-Bautista27, Zhen Cao27, Luigi Cavallo27, Romina Oliva28, Yue Cao29, Yang Shen29, Minkyung Baek30, Taeyong Park30, Hyeonuk Woo30, Chaok Seok30, Merav Braitbard31, Lirane Bitton32, Dina Scheidman-Duhovny31,32, Justas Dapkūnas33, Kliment Olechnovič33, Česlovas Venclovas33, Petras J Kundrotas34, Saveliy Belkin34, Devlina Chakravarty34, Varsha D Badal34, Ilya A Vakser34, Thom Vreven35, Sweta Vangaveti35, Tyler Borrman35, Zhiping Weng35, Johnathan D Guest36,37, Ragul Gowthaman36,37, Brian G Pierce36,37, Xianjin Xu38, Rui Duan38, Liming Qiu38, Jie Hou39, Benjamin Ryan Merideth38,40, Zhiwei Ma38,41, Jianlin Cheng39,40, Xiaoqin Zou38,40,41,42, Panagiotis I Koukos43, Jorge Roel-Touris43, Francesco Ambrosetti43, Cunliang Geng43, Jörg Schaarschmidt43, Mikael E Trellet43, Adrien S J Melquiond43, Li Xue43, Brian Jiménez-García43, Charlotte W van Noort43, Rodrigo V Honorato43, Alexandre M J J Bonvin43, Shoshana J Wodak44.   

Abstract

We present the results for CAPRI Round 46, the third joint CASP-CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge. The Round comprised a total of 20 targets including 14 homo-oligomers and 6 heterocomplexes. Eight of the homo-oligomer targets and one heterodimer comprised proteins that could be readily modeled using templates from the Protein Data Bank, often available for the full assembly. The remaining 11 targets comprised 5 homodimers, 3 heterodimers, and two higher-order assemblies. These were more difficult to model, as their prediction mainly involved "ab-initio" docking of subunit models derived from distantly related templates. A total of ~30 CAPRI groups, including 9 automatic servers, submitted on average ~2000 models per target. About 17 groups participated in the CAPRI scoring rounds, offered for most targets, submitting ~170 models per target. The prediction performance, measured by the fraction of models of acceptable quality or higher submitted across all predictors groups, was very good to excellent for the nine easy targets. Poorer performance was achieved by predictors for the 11 difficult targets, with medium and high quality models submitted for only 3 of these targets. A similar performance "gap" was displayed by scorer groups, highlighting yet again the unmet challenge of modeling the conformational changes of the protein components that occur upon binding or that must be accounted for in template-based modeling. Our analysis also indicates that residues in binding interfaces were less well predicted in this set of targets than in previous Rounds, providing useful insights for directions of future improvements.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAPRI; CASP; blind prediction; docking; oligomeric state; protein assemblies; protein complexes; protein-protein interaction; template-based modeling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31612567      PMCID: PMC7274794          DOI: 10.1002/prot.25838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  71 in total

1.  GOAP: a generalized orientation-dependent, all-atom statistical potential for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Docking and scoring protein interactions: CAPRI 2009.

Authors:  Marc F Lensink; Shoshana J Wodak
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-11-15

3.  Blind predictions of protein interfaces by docking calculations in CAPRI.

Authors:  Marc F Lensink; Shoshana J Wodak
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-11-15

4.  The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites.

Authors:  L Lo Conte; C Chothia; J Janin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-02-05       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Statistical mechanics-based method to extract atomic distance-dependent potentials from protein structures.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-07-05

6.  CONSRANK: a server for the analysis, comparison and ranking of docking models based on inter-residue contacts.

Authors:  Edrisse Chermak; Andrea Petta; Luigi Serra; Anna Vangone; Vittorio Scarano; Luigi Cavallo; Romina Oliva
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  The ClusPro web server for protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Dima Kozakov; David R Hall; Bing Xia; Kathryn A Porter; Dzmitry Padhorny; Christine Yueh; Dmitri Beglov; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 13.491

8.  Protein Structure Modeling with MODELLER.

Authors:  Benjamin Webb; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

9.  Assessment of protein assembly prediction in CASP12.

Authors:  Aleix Lafita; Spencer Bliven; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Martino Bertoni; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Jose M Duarte; Torsten Schwede; Guido Capitani
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-11-08

10.  DockQ: A Quality Measure for Protein-Protein Docking Models.

Authors:  Sankar Basu; Björn Wallner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  31 in total

1.  Application of docking methodologies to modeled proteins.

Authors:  Amar Singh; Taras Dauzhenka; Petras J Kundrotas; Michael J E Sternberg; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2020-03-20

Review 2.  Challenges in protein docking.

Authors:  Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  LZerD webserver for pairwise and multiple protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Charles Christoffer; Siyang Chen; Vijay Bharadwaj; Tunde Aderinwale; Vidhur Kumar; Matin Hormati; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  How to choose templates for modeling of protein complexes: Insights from benchmarking template-based docking.

Authors:  Devlina Chakravarty; G W McElfresh; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2020-02-07

5.  Performance of human and server prediction in CAPRI rounds 38-45.

Authors:  Rui Duan; Liming Qiu; Xianjin Xu; Zhiwei Ma; Benjamin Ryan Merideth; Chi-Ren Shyu; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2020-07-01

6.  Energy-based graph convolutional networks for scoring protein docking models.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Yang Shen
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2020-03-16

7.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XIII.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Maya Topf; Krzysztof Fidelis; John Moult
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-10-23

8.  The HDOCK server for integrated protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Yumeng Yan; Huanyu Tao; Jiahua He; Sheng-You Huang
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 13.491

9.  Structural Design and Analysis of the RHOA-ARHGEF1 Binding Mode: Challenges and Applications for Protein-Protein Interface Prediction.

Authors:  Ennys Gheyouche; Matthias Bagueneau; Gervaise Loirand; Bernard Offmann; Stéphane Téletchéa
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-05-24

10.  Structural Insights into the Interaction of Filovirus Glycoproteins with the Endosomal Receptor Niemann-Pick C1: A Computational Study.

Authors:  Manabu Igarashi; Takatsugu Hirokawa; Yoshihiro Takadate; Ayato Takada
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.