| Literature DB >> 31612567 |
Marc F Lensink1, Guillaume Brysbaert1, Nurul Nadzirin2, Sameer Velankar2, Raphaël A G Chaleil3, Tereza Gerguri3, Paul A Bates3, Elodie Laine4, Alessandra Carbone4,5, Sergei Grudinin6, Ren Kong7, Ran-Ran Liu7, Xi-Ming Xu7, Hang Shi7, Shan Chang7, Miriam Eisenstein8, Agnieszka Karczynska9, Cezary Czaplewski9, Emilia Lubecka10, Agnieszka Lipska9, Paweł Krupa11, Magdalena Mozolewska12, Łukasz Golon9, Sergey Samsonov9, Adam Liwo9,13, Silvia Crivelli14, Guillaume Pagès6, Mikhail Karasikov15, Maria Kadukova6,16, Yumeng Yan17, Sheng-You Huang17, Mireia Rosell18,19, Luis A Rodríguez-Lumbreras18,19, Miguel Romero-Durana18, Lucía Díaz-Bueno18, Juan Fernandez-Recio18,19,20, Charles Christoffer21, Genki Terashi22, Woong-Hee Shin22, Tunde Aderinwale21, Sai Raghavendra Maddhuri Venkata Subraman21, Daisuke Kihara21, Dima Kozakov23, Sandor Vajda24,25, Kathryn Porter24, Dzmitry Padhorny23, Israel Desta24, Dmitri Beglov24, Mikhail Ignatov23, Sergey Kotelnikov16,23, Iain H Moal2, David W Ritchie26, Isaure Chauvot de Beauchêne26, Bernard Maigret26, Marie-Dominique Devignes26, Maria E Ruiz Echartea26, Didier Barradas-Bautista27, Zhen Cao27, Luigi Cavallo27, Romina Oliva28, Yue Cao29, Yang Shen29, Minkyung Baek30, Taeyong Park30, Hyeonuk Woo30, Chaok Seok30, Merav Braitbard31, Lirane Bitton32, Dina Scheidman-Duhovny31,32, Justas Dapkūnas33, Kliment Olechnovič33, Česlovas Venclovas33, Petras J Kundrotas34, Saveliy Belkin34, Devlina Chakravarty34, Varsha D Badal34, Ilya A Vakser34, Thom Vreven35, Sweta Vangaveti35, Tyler Borrman35, Zhiping Weng35, Johnathan D Guest36,37, Ragul Gowthaman36,37, Brian G Pierce36,37, Xianjin Xu38, Rui Duan38, Liming Qiu38, Jie Hou39, Benjamin Ryan Merideth38,40, Zhiwei Ma38,41, Jianlin Cheng39,40, Xiaoqin Zou38,40,41,42, Panagiotis I Koukos43, Jorge Roel-Touris43, Francesco Ambrosetti43, Cunliang Geng43, Jörg Schaarschmidt43, Mikael E Trellet43, Adrien S J Melquiond43, Li Xue43, Brian Jiménez-García43, Charlotte W van Noort43, Rodrigo V Honorato43, Alexandre M J J Bonvin43, Shoshana J Wodak44.
Abstract
We present the results for CAPRI Round 46, the third joint CASP-CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge. The Round comprised a total of 20 targets including 14 homo-oligomers and 6 heterocomplexes. Eight of the homo-oligomer targets and one heterodimer comprised proteins that could be readily modeled using templates from the Protein Data Bank, often available for the full assembly. The remaining 11 targets comprised 5 homodimers, 3 heterodimers, and two higher-order assemblies. These were more difficult to model, as their prediction mainly involved "ab-initio" docking of subunit models derived from distantly related templates. A total of ~30 CAPRI groups, including 9 automatic servers, submitted on average ~2000 models per target. About 17 groups participated in the CAPRI scoring rounds, offered for most targets, submitting ~170 models per target. The prediction performance, measured by the fraction of models of acceptable quality or higher submitted across all predictors groups, was very good to excellent for the nine easy targets. Poorer performance was achieved by predictors for the 11 difficult targets, with medium and high quality models submitted for only 3 of these targets. A similar performance "gap" was displayed by scorer groups, highlighting yet again the unmet challenge of modeling the conformational changes of the protein components that occur upon binding or that must be accounted for in template-based modeling. Our analysis also indicates that residues in binding interfaces were less well predicted in this set of targets than in previous Rounds, providing useful insights for directions of future improvements.Entities:
Keywords: CAPRI; CASP; blind prediction; docking; oligomeric state; protein assemblies; protein complexes; protein-protein interaction; template-based modeling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31612567 PMCID: PMC7274794 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25838
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proteins ISSN: 0887-3585