| Literature DB >> 31601914 |
Rayner González-Prendes1,2, Ramona Natacha Pena1, Emma Solé1, Ahmad Reza Seradj1, Joan Estany3, Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas4.
Abstract
In this study we investigated the impact of dietary protein and carotene levels on microbial functions and composition during the last month of purebred fattening Duroc pigs. Fecal microbiota was characterized using 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing at two points of live, 165 (T1) and 195 (T2) days. From 70 to 165 days of age, 32 pigs were divided into two groups fed either a standard-protein (SP) or a low-protein (LP) diet. In the last month (165-195 days), all pigs received a LP diet, either carotene-enriched (CE) or not (NC). Significant differences were observed between T1 and T2 at Amplicon Sequences Variants (ASVs), phylum and genus levels. In T1 group, Prevotella, Faecalibacterium and Treponema were the genera most influenced by dietary protein, together with predicted functions related with the degradation of protein. In contrast, the CE diet did not impact the microbiome diversity, although 160 ASVs were differentially abundant between CE and NC groups at T2. Weak stability of enterotype clusters across time-points was observed as consequence of medium-term dietary interventions. Our results suggest that during the last month of fattening, dietary protein have a stronger effect than carotenes on the modulation of the compositional and functional structure of the pig microbiota.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31601914 PMCID: PMC6787051 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51136-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) plots of bacterial communities at (a) Amplicon Sequences Variants, (b) phylum and (c) genus levels by samples taken at 165 days (T1) and 195 days (T2).
Figure 2Sparse Partial‐least‐squares Discriminant Analysis plots of T1 group (a) and T2 group (b) after Amplicon Sequences Variants selection (139 and 151, respectively). The feed factor standard protein (SP) vs low protein (LP) in T1 and carotene-enriched (CE) vs control diet (NC) in T2 factors were used to distinguish groups. At time-point T1, purple color represents the low-protein diet and pink color the standard-protein diet. At time-point T2, purple color represents the carotene-enriched diet and pink color the control diet.
Figure 3Heat map showing sample distribution using the most commonly identified Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) in the differentially abundant and the sparse partial least squares regression discriminant analyses. At time-point T1, purple color represents the low-protein diet and green color the standard- protein diet. At time-point T2, purple color represents the carotene-enriched diet and green color the control diet.
Figure 4Evolution/transition of pigs from time-point T1 (165 days of age) to time-point T2 (195 days of age). The red color represents EPA: Enterotype like cluster A; the blue color represents EPB: Enterotype like cluster B. CE: carotene-enriched, NC: not carotene, control diet.
Genus bacterial differentially abundant between the two predicted enterotype-like clusters in time-point T1 (165 days of age).
| Genus | Counts in EPA (SD) | Counts in EPB (SD) | P-values | Adjusted p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 58.11 (2.47) | 8.75 (1.69) | 3.09E-03 | 8.40E-03 |
|
| 35.59 (2.70) | 0 | 2.64E-17 | 1.29E-15 |
|
| 28.26 (1.89) | 3.19 (0.89) | 8.47E-09 | 4.61E-08 |
|
| 28.40 (2.49) | 3.78 (1.05) | 1.88E-03 | 5.81E-03 |
|
| 20.75 (2.50) | 0 | 1.56E-11 | 1.53E-10 |
|
| 20.04 (2.46) | 0 | 9.79E-13 | 1.60E-11 |
|
| 55.34 (3.10) | 35.40 (2.90) | 2.02E-03 | 5.81E-03 |
|
| 22.64 (1.97) | 3.35 (0.93) | 1.65E-02 | 4.05E-02 |
|
| 16.82 (2.40) | 0 | 1.81E-12 | 2.21E-11 |
|
| 15.72 (2.28) | 4.22 (1.17) | 7.79E-04 | 2.94E-03 |
|
| 11.49 (1.65) | 0 | 5.58E-11 | 4.55E-10 |
|
| 15.77 (2.25) | 4.65 (1.29) | 1.98E-03 | 5.81E-03 |
|
| 14.39 (1.72) | 6.68 (1.27) | 3.64E-03 | 9.38E-03 |
|
| 19.56 (2.37) | 12.69 (2.38) | 1.02E-08 | 4.98E-08 |
|
| 7.72 (1.40) | 3.10 (0.86) | 1.15E-03 | 4.02E-03 |
|
| 4.32 (1.16) | 0 | 3.78E-09 | 2.64E-08 |
|
| 7.72 (1.42) | 6.13 (1.18) | 4.58E-06 | 2.04E-05 |
|
| 6.87 (1.26) | 6.07 (1.68) | 1.13E-13 | 2.76E-12 |
|
| 16.39 (2.35) | 17.50 (2.62) | 3.28E-04 | 1.34E-03 |
EPA: Enterotype like cluster A; EPB: Enterotype like cluster B; Counts in EPA: log of the Cumulative Sum Scaling (CSS) normalized abundance of each genus and their standard deviation (SD); Counts in EPB: log of the CSS normalized abundance of each genus and their standard deviation (SD); Adjusted p-value: P-value corrected by q-value calculated with a false discovery rate approach[68].
Genus bacterial differentially-abundant between the two predicted enterotype-like clusters in time-point T2 (195 days of age).
| Genus | Counts in EPA (SD) | Counts in EPB (SD) | P-values | Adjusted p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 83.07 (3.29) | 7.68 (2.43) | 3.74E-05 | 1.68E-04 |
|
| 80.27 (2.05) | 9.84 (2.09) | 1.17E-03 | 4.17E-03 |
|
| 122.58 (0.84) | 63.08 (0.42) | 3.01E-03 | 7.97E-03 |
|
| 61.55 (2.58) | 9.83 (2.09) | 2.70E-03 | 7.59E-03 |
|
| 100.59 (2.89) | 50.72 (2.73) | 1.94E-02 | 4.60E-02 |
|
| 29.28 (2.76) | 7.99 (1.79) | 1.58E-03 | 4.81E-03 |
|
| 21.75 (2.06) | 6.29 (1.50) | 1.60E-03 | 4.81E-03 |
|
| 17.40 (1.96) | 3.70 (1.17) | 1.52E-04 | 6.22E-04 |
|
| 13.46 (1.77) | 0 | 1.46E-11 | 3.28E-10 |
|
| 13.24 (1.76) | 0 | 3.64E-10 | 4.09E-09 |
|
| 12.49 (2.07) | 0 | 8.72E-13 | 3.93E-11 |
|
| 8.59 (1.44) | 0 | 4.62E-09 | 2.97E-08 |
|
| 11.60 (1.93) | 4.49 (1.42) | 1.21E-03 | 4.17E-03 |
|
| 0 | 10.58 (2.26) | 2.67E-07 | 1.50E-06 |
EPA: Enterotype like cluster A; EPB: Enterotype like cluster B; Counts in EPA: log of the CSS normalized abundance of each genus and their standard deviation (SD); Counts in EPB: log of the CSS normalized abundance of each genus and their standard deviation (SD); Adjusted p-value: P-value corrected by q-value calculated with a false discovery rate approach[69].