Literature DB >> 8361839

Organizational factors and the perception of motion in depth.

D H Mershon1, T A Jones, M E Taylor.   

Abstract

When two stationary, stereoscopically separated targets are viewed in a completely dark surround, and no cues concerning their egocentric distances from the observer are salient, the farther target tends to be seen at the same distance it would have assumed if it were by itself. The nearer target is seen as being closer than it would have been if seen alone. The present studies extend this previous finding (now termed the far-anchor effect) into the domain of targets that move in stereoscopic space. Observers viewed two small illuminated targets, which began at either the same or different stereoscopic distances. One of the targets was moved in depth and the observers identified the target that appeared to move. Conditions varied according to the initial depth location of the moving target. Significantly more correct responses were reported when the nearer target moved than when the farther one moved, consistent with the hypothesis that the perception of motion in depth is affected by the aforementioned perceptual anchoring effect of the farther target.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8361839     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  13 in total

1.  Scalar perceptions of distance in simple binocular configurations.

Authors:  D H Mershon; V L Lembo
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1977-03

2.  Binocular distance perception: egocentric distance tasks.

Authors:  J M Foley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Scalar perceptions with binocular cues of distance.

Authors:  W C Gogel
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1972-12

4.  Human ocular vergence movements induced by changing size and disparity.

Authors:  C J Erkelens; D Regan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Necessary conditions for the perception of motion in depth.

Authors:  D Regan; C J Erkelens; H Collewijn
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Induced movement based on subtraction of motion from the inducing object.

Authors:  I Rock; M Auster; M Schiffman; D Wheeler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Binocular distance perception.

Authors:  J M Foley
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Human vision favors centrifugal motion.

Authors:  K Ball; R Sekuler
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Accommodation, convergence, and distance perception in low illumination.

Authors:  D A Owens; H W Liebowitz
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1980-09

10.  Visual field defects for unidirectional and oscillatory motion in depth.

Authors:  X Hong; D Regan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.