Stephen Y Wang1,2,3, Andy S L Tan2, Brian Claggett1, Alvin Chandra1, Sameed Ahmed M Khatana2,4, Pamela L Lutsey5, Anna Kucharska-Newton6,7, Silvia Koton8,9, Scott D Solomon1, Ichiro Kawachi2. 1. Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire. 4. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 5. University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis. 6. University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill. 7. University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington. 8. School of Health Professions, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel. 9. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
Importance: Higher income is associated with lower incident cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, there is limited research on the association between changes in income and incident CVD. Objective: To examine the association between change in household income and subsequent risk of CVD. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities (ARIC) study is an ongoing, prospective cohort of 15 792 community-dwelling men and women, of mostly black or white race, from 4 centers in the United States (Jackson, Mississippi; Washington County, Maryland; suburbs of Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Forsyth County, North Carolina), beginning in 1987. For our analysis, participants were followed up until December 31, 2016. Exposures: Participants were categorized based on whether their household income dropped by more than 50% (income drop), remained unchanged/changed less than 50% (income unchanged), or increased by more than 50% (income rise) over a mean (SD) period of approximately 6 (0.3) years between ARIC visit 1 (1987-1989) and visit 3 (1993-1995). Main Outcomes and Measures: Our primary outcome was incidence of CVD after ARIC visit 3, including myocardial infarction (MI), fatal coronary heart disease, heart failure (HF), or stroke during a mean (SD) of 17 (7) years. Analyses were adjusted for sociodemographic variables, health behaviors, and CVD biomarkers. Results: Of the 8989 included participants (mean [SD] age at enrollment was 53 [6] years, 1820 participants were black [20%], and 3835 participants were men [43%]), 900 participants (10%) experienced an income drop, 6284 participants (70%) had incomes that remained relatively unchanged, and 1805 participants (20%) experienced an income rise. After full adjustment, those with an income drop experienced significantly higher risk of incident CVD compared with those whose incomes remained relatively unchanged (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.03-1.32). Those with an income rise experienced significantly lower risk of incident CVD compared with those whose incomes remained relatively unchanged (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-0.96). Conclusions and Relevance: Income drop over 6 years was associated with higher risk of subsequent incident CVD over 17 years, while income rise over 6 years was associated with lower risk of subsequent incident CVD over 17 years. Health professionals should have greater awareness of the influence of income change on the health of their patients.
Importance: Higher income is associated with lower incident cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, there is limited research on the association between changes in income and incident CVD. Objective: To examine the association between change in household income and subsequent risk of CVD. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities (ARIC) study is an ongoing, prospective cohort of 15 792 community-dwelling men and women, of mostly black or white race, from 4 centers in the United States (Jackson, Mississippi; Washington County, Maryland; suburbs of Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Forsyth County, North Carolina), beginning in 1987. For our analysis, participants were followed up until December 31, 2016. Exposures: Participants were categorized based on whether their household income dropped by more than 50% (income drop), remained unchanged/changed less than 50% (income unchanged), or increased by more than 50% (income rise) over a mean (SD) period of approximately 6 (0.3) years between ARIC visit 1 (1987-1989) and visit 3 (1993-1995). Main Outcomes and Measures: Our primary outcome was incidence of CVD after ARIC visit 3, including myocardial infarction (MI), fatal coronary heart disease, heart failure (HF), or stroke during a mean (SD) of 17 (7) years. Analyses were adjusted for sociodemographic variables, health behaviors, and CVD biomarkers. Results: Of the 8989 included participants (mean [SD] age at enrollment was 53 [6] years, 1820 participants were black [20%], and 3835 participants were men [43%]), 900 participants (10%) experienced an income drop, 6284 participants (70%) had incomes that remained relatively unchanged, and 1805 participants (20%) experienced an income rise. After full adjustment, those with an income drop experienced significantly higher risk of incident CVD compared with those whose incomes remained relatively unchanged (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.03-1.32). Those with an income rise experienced significantly lower risk of incident CVD compared with those whose incomes remained relatively unchanged (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-0.96). Conclusions and Relevance: Income drop over 6 years was associated with higher risk of subsequent incident CVD over 17 years, while income rise over 6 years was associated with lower risk of subsequent incident CVD over 17 years. Health professionals should have greater awareness of the influence of income change on the health of their patients.
Authors: Silvia Koton; Andrea L C Schneider; Wayne D Rosamond; Eyal Shahar; Yingying Sang; Rebecca F Gottesman; Josef Coresh Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-07-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lindsay R Pool; Sarah A Burgard; Belinda L Needham; Michael R Elliott; Kenneth M Langa; Carlos F Mendes de Leon Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Iain J Marshall; Yanzhong Wang; Siobhan Crichton; Christopher McKevitt; Anthony G Rudd; Charles D A Wolfe Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Darla E Kendzor; Michael S Businelle; Tracy J Costello; Yessenia Castro; Lorraine R Reitzel; Ludmila M Cofta-Woerpel; Yisheng Li; Carlos A Mazas; Jennifer Irvin Vidrine; Paul M Cinciripini; Anthony J Greisinger; David W Wetter Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Sameed Ahmed M Khatana; Atheendar S Venkataramani; Ashwin S Nathan; Elias J Dayoub; Lauren A Eberly; Dhruv S Kazi; Robert W Yeh; Nandita Mitra; S V Subramanian; Peter W Groeneveld Journal: JAMA Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mohammad Hashim Jilani; Zulqarnain Javed; Tamer Yahya; Javier Valero-Elizondo; Safi U Khan; Bita Kash; Ron Blankstein; Salim S Virani; Michael J Blaha; Prachi Dubey; Adnan A Hyder; Farhaan S Vahidy; Miguel Cainzos-Achirica; Khurram Nasir Journal: Curr Atheroscler Rep Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 5.113
Authors: Bongeka Z Zuma; Justin T Parizo; Areli Valencia; Gabriela Spencer-Bonilla; Manuel R Blum; David Scheinker; Fatima Rodriguez Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Sameed Ahmed M Khatana; Nicholas Illenberger; Rachel M Werner; Peter W Groeneveld; Nandita Mitra Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2021-10-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Nuria Matilla-Santander; Carles Muntaner; Bertina Kreshpaj; Virginia Gunn; Johanna Jonsson; Lauri Kokkinen; Jenny Selander; Sherry L Baron; Cecilia Orellana; Per-Olof Östergren; Tomas Hemmingsson; David H Wegman; Theo Bodin Journal: Lancet Reg Health Eur Date: 2022-02-03
Authors: Ruth M Reeves; Lee Christensen; Jeremiah R Brown; Michael Conway; Maxwell Levis; Glenn T Gobbel; Rashmee U Shah; Christine Goodrich; Iben Ricket; Freneka Minter; Andrew Bohm; Bruce E Bray; Michael E Matheny; Wendy Chapman Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 8.000