Lindsay R Pool1, Sarah A Burgard2,3,4, Belinda L Needham3, Michael R Elliott4,5, Kenneth M Langa4,6,7,8, Carlos F Mendes de Leon3. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 2. Department of Sociology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 3. Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 4. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 5. Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 6. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor. 7. Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 8. Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Abstract
Importance: A sudden loss of wealth-a negative wealth shock-may lead to a significant mental health toll and also leave fewer monetary resources for health-related expenses. With limited years remaining to regain lost wealth in older age, the health consequences of these negative wealth shocks may be long-lasting. Objective: To determine whether a negative wealth shock was associated with all-cause mortality during 20 years of follow-up. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Health and Retirement Study, a nationally representative prospective cohort study of US adults aged 51 through 61 years at study entry. The study population included 8714 adults, first assessed for a negative wealth shock in 1994 and followed biennially through 2014 (the most recent year of available data). Exposures: Experiencing a negative wealth shock, defined as a loss of 75% or more of total net worth over a 2-year period, or asset poverty, defined as 0 or negative total net worth at study entry. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mortality data were collected from the National Death Index and postmortem interviews with family members. Marginal structural survival methods were used to account for the potential bias due to changes in health status that may both trigger negative wealth shocks and act as the mechanism through which negative wealth shocks lead to increased mortality. Results: There were 8714 participants in the study sample (mean [SD] age at study entry, 55 [3.2] years; 53% women), 2430 experienced a negative wealth shock during follow-up, 749 had asset poverty at baseline, and 5535 had continuously positive wealth without shock. A total of 2823 deaths occurred during 80 683 person-years of follow-up. There were 30.6 vs 64.9 deaths per 1000 person-years for those with continuously positive wealth vs negative wealth shock (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% CI, 1.36-1.67). There were 73.4 deaths per 1000 person-years for those with asset poverty at baseline (adjusted HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.44-1.94; compared with continuously positive wealth). Conclusions and Relevance: Among US adults aged 51 years and older, loss of wealth over 2 years was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality. Further research is needed to better understand the possible mechanisms for this association and determine whether there is potential value for targeted interventions.
Importance: A sudden loss of wealth-a negative wealth shock-may lead to a significant mental health toll and also leave fewer monetary resources for health-related expenses. With limited years remaining to regain lost wealth in older age, the health consequences of these negative wealth shocks may be long-lasting. Objective: To determine whether a negative wealth shock was associated with all-cause mortality during 20 years of follow-up. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Health and Retirement Study, a nationally representative prospective cohort study of US adults aged 51 through 61 years at study entry. The study population included 8714 adults, first assessed for a negative wealth shock in 1994 and followed biennially through 2014 (the most recent year of available data). Exposures: Experiencing a negative wealth shock, defined as a loss of 75% or more of total net worth over a 2-year period, or asset poverty, defined as 0 or negative total net worth at study entry. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mortality data were collected from the National Death Index and postmortem interviews with family members. Marginal structural survival methods were used to account for the potential bias due to changes in health status that may both trigger negative wealth shocks and act as the mechanism through which negative wealth shocks lead to increased mortality. Results: There were 8714 participants in the study sample (mean [SD] age at study entry, 55 [3.2] years; 53% women), 2430 experienced a negative wealth shock during follow-up, 749 had asset poverty at baseline, and 5535 had continuously positive wealth without shock. A total of 2823 deaths occurred during 80 683 person-years of follow-up. There were 30.6 vs 64.9 deaths per 1000 person-years for those with continuously positive wealth vs negative wealth shock (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% CI, 1.36-1.67). There were 73.4 deaths per 1000 person-years for those with asset poverty at baseline (adjusted HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.44-1.94; compared with continuously positive wealth). Conclusions and Relevance: Among US adults aged 51 years and older, loss of wealth over 2 years was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality. Further research is needed to better understand the possible mechanisms for this association and determine whether there is potential value for targeted interventions.
Authors: Amanda Sonnega; Jessica D Faul; Mary Beth Ofstedal; Kenneth M Langa; John W R Phillips; David R Weir Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2014-03-25 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Lindsay R Pool; Belinda L Needham; Sarah A Burgard; Michael R Elliott; Carlos F Mendes de Leon Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Daniel Westreich; Stephen R Cole; Phyllis C Tien; Joan S Chmiel; Lawrence Kingsley; Michele Jonsson Funk; Kathryn Anastos; Lisa P Jacobson Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-02-05 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Belén Sanz-Barbero; Ana Rico Gómez; Alba Ayala; Patricia Recio; Encarnación Sarriá; Manuel Díaz-Olalla; María Victoria Zunzunegui Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Rohan Khera; Javier Valero-Elizondo; Victor Okunrintemi; Anshul Saxena; Sandeep R Das; James A de Lemos; Harlan M Krumholz; Khurram Nasir Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Stephen Y Wang; Andy S L Tan; Brian Claggett; Alvin Chandra; Sameed Ahmed M Khatana; Pamela L Lutsey; Anna Kucharska-Newton; Silvia Koton; Scott D Solomon; Ichiro Kawachi Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Nam Pho; Arjun K Manrai; John T Leppert; Glenn M Chertow; John P A Ioannidis; Chirag J Patel Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 8.327