Mohammad Hashim Jilani1, Zulqarnain Javed2, Tamer Yahya2, Javier Valero-Elizondo2, Safi U Khan3, Bita Kash4, Ron Blankstein5, Salim S Virani6,7, Michael J Blaha8, Prachi Dubey9, Adnan A Hyder10, Farhaan S Vahidy4, Miguel Cainzos-Achirica2,4, Khurram Nasir11,12,13. 1. Division of Cardiovascular Health and Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 2. Division of Cardiovascular Prevention and Wellness, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA. 4. Division of Health Equity & Disparities Research, Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA. 5. Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affair Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA. 7. Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. 8. Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 9. Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA. 10. Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA. 11. Division of Cardiovascular Prevention and Wellness, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA. knasir@houstonmethodist.org. 12. Division of Health Equity & Disparities Research, Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA. knasir@houstonmethodist.org. 13. Center for Computational Health & Precision Medicine (C3-PH), Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA. knasir@houstonmethodist.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We sought to examine the role of social and environmental conditions that determine an individual's behaviors and risk of disease-collectively known as social determinants of health (SDOH)-in shaping cardiovascular (CV) health of the population and giving rise to disparities in risk factors, outcomes, and clinical care for cardiovascular disease (CVD), the leading cause of death in the United States (US). RECENT FINDINGS: Traditional CV risk factors have been extensively targeted in existing CVD prevention and management paradigms, often with little attention to SDOH. Limited evidence suggests an association between individual SDOH (e.g., income, education) and CVD. However, inequities in CVD care, risk factors, and outcomes have not been studied using a broad SDOH framework. We examined existing evidence of the association between SDOH-organized into 6 domains, including economic stability, education, food, neighborhood and physical environment, healthcare system, and community and social context-and CVD. Greater social adversity, defined by adverse SDOH, was linked to higher burden of CVD risk factors and poor outcomes, such as stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), coronary heart disease, heart failure, and mortality. Conversely, favorable social conditions had protective effects on CVD. Upstream SDOH interact across domains to produce cumulative downstream effects on CV health, via multiple physiologic and behavioral pathways. SDOH are major drivers of sociodemographic disparities in CVD, with a disproportionate impact on socially disadvantaged populations. Efforts to achieve health equity should take into account the structural, institutional, and environmental barriers to optimum CV health in marginalized populations. In this review, we highlight major knowledge gaps for each SDOH domain and propose a set of actionable recommendations to inform CVD care, ensure equitable distribution of healthcare resources, and reduce observed disparities.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We sought to examine the role of social and environmental conditions that determine an individual's behaviors and risk of disease-collectively known as social determinants of health (SDOH)-in shaping cardiovascular (CV) health of the population and giving rise to disparities in risk factors, outcomes, and clinical care for cardiovascular disease (CVD), the leading cause of death in the United States (US). RECENT FINDINGS: Traditional CV risk factors have been extensively targeted in existing CVD prevention and management paradigms, often with little attention to SDOH. Limited evidence suggests an association between individual SDOH (e.g., income, education) and CVD. However, inequities in CVD care, risk factors, and outcomes have not been studied using a broad SDOH framework. We examined existing evidence of the association between SDOH-organized into 6 domains, including economic stability, education, food, neighborhood and physical environment, healthcare system, and community and social context-and CVD. Greater social adversity, defined by adverse SDOH, was linked to higher burden of CVD risk factors and poor outcomes, such as stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), coronary heart disease, heart failure, and mortality. Conversely, favorable social conditions had protective effects on CVD. Upstream SDOH interact across domains to produce cumulative downstream effects on CV health, via multiple physiologic and behavioral pathways. SDOH are major drivers of sociodemographic disparities in CVD, with a disproportionate impact on socially disadvantaged populations. Efforts to achieve health equity should take into account the structural, institutional, and environmental barriers to optimum CV health in marginalized populations. In this review, we highlight major knowledge gaps for each SDOH domain and propose a set of actionable recommendations to inform CVD care, ensure equitable distribution of healthcare resources, and reduce observed disparities.
Authors: Anna Fretz; Andrea L C Schneider; John W McEvoy; Ron Hoogeveen; Christie M Ballantyne; Josef Coresh; Elizabeth Selvin Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Paul Muntner; Alvaro Alonso; Marcio S Bittencourt; Clifton W Callaway; April P Carson; Alanna M Chamberlain; Alexander R Chang; Susan Cheng; Sandeep R Das; Francesca N Delling; Luc Djousse; Mitchell S V Elkind; Jane F Ferguson; Myriam Fornage; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Sadiya S Khan; Brett M Kissela; Kristen L Knutson; Tak W Kwan; Daniel T Lackland; Tené T Lewis; Judith H Lichtman; Chris T Longenecker; Matthew Shane Loop; Pamela L Lutsey; Seth S Martin; Kunihiro Matsushita; Andrew E Moran; Michael E Mussolino; Martin O'Flaherty; Ambarish Pandey; Amanda M Perak; Wayne D Rosamond; Gregory A Roth; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Gary M Satou; Emily B Schroeder; Svati H Shah; Nicole L Spartano; Andrew Stokes; David L Tirschwell; Connie W Tsao; Mintu P Turakhia; Lisa B VanWagner; John T Wilkins; Sally S Wong; Salim S Virani Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Stephen Y Wang; Andy S L Tan; Brian Claggett; Alvin Chandra; Sameed Ahmed M Khatana; Pamela L Lutsey; Anna Kucharska-Newton; Silvia Koton; Scott D Solomon; Ichiro Kawachi Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: William M Schultz; Heval M Kelli; John C Lisko; Tina Varghese; Jia Shen; Pratik Sandesara; Arshed A Quyyumi; Herman A Taylor; Martha Gulati; John G Harold; Jennifer H Mieres; Keith C Ferdinand; George A Mensah; Laurence S Sperling Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-05-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Iain J Marshall; Yanzhong Wang; Siobhan Crichton; Christopher McKevitt; Anthony G Rudd; Charles D A Wolfe Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Edward P Havranek; Mahasin S Mujahid; Donald A Barr; Irene V Blair; Meryl S Cohen; Salvador Cruz-Flores; George Davey-Smith; Cheryl R Dennison-Himmelfarb; Michael S Lauer; Debra W Lockwood; Milagros Rosal; Clyde W Yancy Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-08-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Joe Kwun Nam Chan; Ryan Sai Ting Chu; Chun Hung; Jenny Wai Yiu Law; Corine Sau Man Wong; Wing Chung Chang Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 7.348