Literature DB >> 31585444

Effect of grid geometry on the transmission properties of 2D grids for flat detectors in CBCT.

Cem Altunbas1, Timur Alexeev, Moyed Miften, Brian Kavanagh.   

Abstract

To suppress scatter in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), two-dimensional antiscatter grids (2D grid) have been recently proposed. In this work, we developed several grid prototypes with higher grid ratios and smaller grid pitches than previous designs, and quantified their primary and scatter transmission properties in the context of CBCT for radiation therapy. Three focused 2D grid prototypes were developed with grid ratios at 12 and 16, and grid pitches at 2 and 3 mm. Their scatter transmission properties were measured between 80-140 kVp, and benchmarked against a high performance radiographic grid (1D grid) using a Varian TrueBeam CBCT system. The effect of source-grid misalignment on the primary transmission and the improvement in contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were also evaluated. Changing the grid pitch from two to three mm increased the average primary transmission from 84% to 89%. Maximum scatter-to-primary ratio (SPR) with grid ratio of 12 was 0.3, and increasing the grid ratio to 16 reduced SPR by 30%. A 10 mm misalignment in 2D grid position led to a 6%-8% reduction in average primary transmission, and reduction was more pronounced for the higher grid ratio. 2D grids provided up to factor of seven lower SPR and 21% better primary transmission than the 1D grid, and their scatter transmission exhibited lower energy dependence. While 2D grids provided up to factor of 2.3 higher CNR improvement, a significant variation in CNR improvement was not observed among different grid pitch and ratios. In summary, grid ratio of 16 and grid pitch of 2 mm can keep SPRs below 0.2 even in high scatter conditions, while keeping primary transmission fractions above 80%, key benefits of the investigated 2D grids in improving image quality of CBCT. However, such grids require precise alignment in source-grid geometry during CBCT acquisitions. This study also implies that 2D grids can provide substantially better scatter suppression and primary transmission than high-performance 1D grids currently available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31585444      PMCID: PMC6937210          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab4af4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  15 in total

1.  Additive noise properties of active matrix flat-panel imagers.

Authors:  M Maolinbay; Y El-Mohri; L E Antonuk; K W Jee; S Nassif; X Rong; Q Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  The influence of antiscatter grids on soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detectors.

Authors:  J H Siewerdsen; D J Moseley; B Bakhtiar; S Richard; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Grids or air gaps for scatter reduction in digital radiography: a model calculation.

Authors:  U Neitzel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Physical evaluation of prototype high-performance anti-scatter grids: potential for improved digital radiographic image quality.

Authors:  Kenneth A Fetterly; Beth A Schueler
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Reduction of ring artifacts in CBCT: detection and correction of pixel gain variations in flat panel detectors.

Authors:  Cem Altunbas; Chao-Jen Lai; Yuncheng Zhong; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Dual-energy cone-beam CT with a flat-panel detector: effect of reconstruction algorithm on material classification.

Authors:  W Zbijewski; G J Gang; J Xu; A S Wang; J W Stayman; K Taguchi; J A Carrino; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Investigation of the performance of antiscatter grids: Monte Carlo simulation studies.

Authors:  H P Chan; K Doi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Two-dimensional antiscatter grid: A novel scatter rejection device for Cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Timur Alexeev; Brian Kavanagh; Moyed Miften; Cem Altunbas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Optimal combination of anti-scatter grids and software correction for CBCT imaging.

Authors:  Uros Stankovic; Lennert S Ploeger; Marcel van Herk; Jan-Jakob Sonke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Transmission characteristics of a two dimensional antiscatter grid prototype for CBCT.

Authors:  Cem Altunbas; Brian Kavanagh; Timur Alexeev; Moyed Miften
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  5 in total

1.  Simultaneous scatter rejection and correction method using 2D antiscatter grids for CBCT.

Authors:  Zhelin Yu; Yeonok Park; Cem Altunbas
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2020-03-16

2.  Concurrent kilovoltage CBCT imaging and megavoltage beam delivery: suppression of cross-scatter with 2D antiscatter grids and grid-based scatter sampling.

Authors:  Farhang Bayat; Mohamed Elsayed Eldib; Brian Kavanagh; Moyed Miften; Cem Altunbas
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.174

3.  Megavoltage cross-scatter rejection and correction using 2D antiscatter grids in kilovoltage CBCT imaging.

Authors:  Farhang Bayat; Mohamed Elsayed Eldib; Cem Altunbas
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2022-04-04

4.  Evaluation of scatter rejection and correction performance of 2D antiscatter grids in cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Yeonok Park; Timur Alexeev; Brian Miller; Moyed Miften; Cem Altunbas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A unified scatter rejection and correction method for cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Cem Altunbas; Yeonok Park; Zhelin Yu; Anant Gopal
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 4.071

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.