| Literature DB >> 31581244 |
Abdur Rahim Khan1, L G Reichmann1, J C Ibal2, J H Shin2, Y Liu1, H Collins3, B LePage4,5, N Terry1.
Abstract
The main purpose of this study was to explore the potential influences of pickleweed vegetation on the abundance, diversity and metabolic activities of microbial communities in four distinct areas of a petroleum-contaminated solid waste management unit (SWMU) located in Contra Costa County, northern California. The four areas sampled include two central areas, one of which is central vegetated (CV) and one unvegetated (UV), and two peripheral vegetated areas, one of which is located to the west side of the SWMU (V-West) and one located to the east side (V-East). Measurements were made of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), soil physicochemical properties, and various aspects of microbial communities including metabolic activities, microbial abundances (PLFAs), diversity and composition based on amplicon sequencing. The peripheral V-East and V-West sites had 10-times lower electrical conductivity (EC) than that of the CV and UV sites. The high salinity levels of the CV and UV sites were associated with significant reductions in bacterial and fungal abundances (PLFA) when compared to V-East but not when compared to V-West. TPH levels of CV and UV were not significantly different from those of V-West but were substantially lower than V-East TPH (19,311 mg/kg of dry soil), the high value of which may have been associated with a pipeline that ran through the area. Microbial activities (in terms of soil respiration and the activities of three soil enzymes, i.e., urease, lipase, and phosphatase) were greatest in the vegetated sites compared to the UV site. The prokaryotic community was not diverse as revealed by the Shannon index with no significant variation among the four groups of samples. However, the fungal community of the peripheral sites, V-East and V-West had significantly higher OTU richness and Shannon index. Structure of prokaryotic communities inhabiting the rhizosphere of pickleweed plants at the three sites differed significantly and were also different from those found in the UV region of the central site according to pairwise, global PERMANOVA and ANOSIM analyses. The differences in OTU-based rhizosphere-associated bacterial and fungal communities' composition were explained mainly by the changes in soil EC and pH. The results suggest that saline TPH-contaminated areas that are vegetated with pickleweed are likely to have increased abundances, diversity and metabolic activities in the rhizosphere compared to unvegetated areas, even in the presence of high salinity.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31581244 PMCID: PMC6776359 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222901
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Schematic representation of the sampling sites within solid waste management unit (SWMU) located in Contra Costa County, northern California.
A total of twenty-four composite samples were taken at four different areas: 1) Total of eight composite rhizosphere-associated soil samples from pickleweed plants growing on the east (4-samples) and west side (4-samples) of the central SWMU area and referred as peripheral vegetated, V-East (yellow triangles), and V-West (yellow stars) sites, respectively. 2) From the central SWMU sampling site; eight rhizosphere-associated soil samples from pickleweed plants growing within SWMU site (CV, yellow rectangular); and eight bulk soil (un-vegetated) samples within SWMU site away from pickleweed plants rhizosphere (UV, red rectangular).
Physicochemical differences among the sample sites.
| Variable | V-East | V-West | CV (N = 8) | UV (N = 8) | ANOVA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrical Conductivity (dS m-1) | 1.29 ± 0.91 (b) | 0.39 ± 0.50 (b) | 10.61 ± 5.76 (a) | 12.30 ± 2.81 (a) | |
| % Gravimetric Water | 47.26 ± 22.81 (a) | 4.43 ± 2.12 (b) | 59.11 ± 25.14 (a) | 39.26 ± 6.20 (a) | |
| Water potential (MPa) | -0.26 ± 0.14 (a) | -52.02 ± 9.44 (b) | -7.63 ± 3.01 (c) | -3.90 ± 1.98 (ac) | |
| pH | 7.41 ± 0.35 (b) | 7.78 ± 0.10 (ab) | 8.08 ± 0.11 (a) | 7.41 ± 0.45 (b) | |
| N-NH4+ (μg kg-1 soil) | 7.94 ± 5.28 | 3.50 ± 0.71 | 7.13 ± 2.82 | 4.05 ± 2.91 | NS |
| N-NO3- (μg kg-1 soil) | 3.56 ± 3.34 | 0.52 ± 0.56 | 0.94 ± 1.57 | 1.78 ± 2.23 | NS |
| TPHs (mg kg-1 soil) | 19,311 ± 3,879 (a) | 5,975± 3,3133 (b) | 5,400 ± 1,853 (b) | 9,422 ± 6,973 (b) | |
| Respiration (μg CO2 g-1 soil h-1) | 19.92 ± 5.83 (ac) | 21.63 ± 4.59 (a) | 14.62 ± 2.23 (cb) | 10.44 ± 3.61 (b) | |
| Lipase (μg p-nitrophenol g-1 soil h-1) | 1,195 ± 350 (ac) | 1,298 ± 275 (c) | 744 ± 303 (ad) | 626 ± 216 (bd) | |
| Urease (μmol NH4/g-1 soil h-1) | 1,306 ± 187 (a) | 951 ± 328 (ac) | 1,062 ± 253 (a) | 608 ± 184 (c) | |
| Phosphatase (μmol p-nitrophenol g-1 soil h-1) | 1.74 ± 1.01 (a) | 0.58 ± 0.13 (bc) | 1.43 ± 0.49 (ac) | 0.45 ± 0.24 (b) | |
| Total PLFAs (nmol g-1 of dry soil) | 1,336 ± 625 (a) | 235 ± 66 (b) | 583 ± 505 (b) | 188 ± 102 (b) | |
| Bacteria PLFA | 985 ± 460 (a) | 172 ± 53 (b) | 432 ± 349 (b) | 164 ± 89 (b) | |
| Fungi PLFA | 310 ± 143 (a) | 55 ± 16 (b) | 130 ± 140 (b) | 21 ± 12 (b) | |
| Bacteria: Fungi PLFA ratio | 3.18 ± 0.25 (a) | 3.10 ± 0.71 (a) | 3.66 ± 0.76 (a) | 7.90 ± 2.43 (b) |
[Note: Different letters correspond to differences between sites for the particular variable (Tukey multiple comparisons of means; 95% family-wise confidence level). Values correspond to mean ±1 standard deviation. Significance codes
‘***’ <0.001
'**' <0.0].
Mantel test results correlating OTU-based structure of soil prokaryotic and fungal communities with soil physicochemical properties in the vegetated soil at the peripheral sites, V-East and V-West and in the central vegetated (CV) and un-vegetated (UV) soils at the central SWMU site.
| Variable | Bacterial communities | Fungal communities | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | p-value | R | p-value | |
| Electrical Conductivity | 0.0001 | 0.0007 | ||
| % Gravimetric Water | 0.0063 | 0.0164 | ||
| Water potential (MPa) | -0.822 | 1 | -0.714 | 1 |
| pH | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | ||
| Temperature | 0.224 | 0.0262 | 0.175 | 0.05 |
| N-NH4+ | 0.0211 | 0.0366 | ||
| N-NO3- | 0.0094 | 0.0213 | ||
| Total petroleum hydrocarbons | 0.0015 | 0.0025 | ||
R2 values in bold indicate statistical significance (p ≤ 0.05).