Modulation of Type III Secretion System in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Involvement of the PA4857 Gene Product.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen that causes serious acute or chronic infections in humans. Acute infections typically involve the type III secretion systems (T3SSs) and bacterial motility, whereas chronic infections are often associated with biofilm formation and the type VI secretion system. To identify new genes required for pathogenesis, a transposon mutagenesis library was constructed and the gene PA4857, named tspR, was found to modulate T3SS gene expression. Deletion of P. aeruginosa tspR reduced the virulence in a mouse acute lung infection model and diminished cytotoxicity. Suppression of T3SS gene expression in the tspR mutant resulted from compromised translation of the T3SS master regulator ExsA. TspR negatively regulated two small RNAs, RsmY and RsmZ, which control RsmA. Our data demonstrated that defects in T3SS expression and biofilm formation in retS mutant could be partially restored by overexpression of tspR. Taken together, our results demonstrated that the newly identified retS-tspR pathway is coordinated with the retS-gacS system, which regulates the genes associated with acute and chronic infections and controls the lifestyle choice of P. aeruginosa.

Introduction

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most common nosocomial pathogens and often causes numerous acute or chronic infections (Deretic et al., 1995). The acute infections mainly rely on the expression of specific virulence factors, such as flagella, pili, exotoxin, and the type III secretion system (T3SS) (Sadikot et al., 2005). Chronic P. aeruginosa infections, such as pulmonary infections in cystic fibrosis (Brencic et al., 2009), are often accompanied by the formation of bacterial biofilm communities, which is the major barrier to eradicate P. aeruginosa chronic infections (Deretic et al., 1995; Parsek and Singh, 2003; Morita et al., 2014).

The ability of P. aeruginosa to avoid phagocytic clearance is a major virulence determinant that primarily depends on the T3SS (Dacheux et al., 1999; Rangel et al., 2014). P. aeruginosa uses its T3SS to produce and directly inject four virulence effectors (ExoS, ExoT, ExoY, and ExoU; Frank, 1997; Ghosh, 2004; Sato and Frank, 2011) in addition to nucleoside diphosphate kinase (NDK; Neeld et al., 2014) into host cells that disrupt intracellular signaling or cell death (Francis et al., 2002). The T3SS of P. aeruginosa has been shown to contribute to epithelial cell and macrophage damage in vitro, in animal models of disease, and in human infections (Roy-Burman et al., 2001; Smith et al., 2004; Engel and Balachandran, 2009).

Type III secretion system gene expression is activated by numerous environmental signals including bacterial contact with host cells and growth in low calcium conditions (Frank, 1997; Hueck, 1998; Vallis et al., 1999). The regulation of T3SS is achieved through a complex regulatory network (Yahr and Wolfgang, 2006; Diaz et al., 2011) controlled by a master regulator ExsA, which is an AraC-family that recognizes and binds to a consensus sequence located upstream of the transcriptional start sites of T3SS genes (Hovey and Frank, 1995). The two-component system AlgR/FimS recalibrates the RsmAYZ post-transcriptional regulatory system to suppress the T3SS in the context of a mucoid background (Wu et al., 2004; Jones et al., 2010; Intile et al., 2014). Alteration of intracellular cAMP levels also affects T3SS expression, and cAMP influences gene expression by acting as an allosteric regulator of Vfr, which is required for the expression of quorum-sensing, exotoxin A production and Type IV pilus-mediated twitching motility genes (West et al., 1994; Albus et al., 1997; Beatson et al., 2002). Microarray analyses revealed that vfr mutation reduced T3SS expression (Wolfgang et al., 2003). Overexpression of PtrA or PtrB, which are induced by copper stress or the SOS response, represses T3SS (Ha et al., 2004; Wu and Jin, 2005; Elsen et al., 2011). Moreover, deletion of genes related to metabolic processes also leads to inhibition of T3SS expression (Rietsch et al., 2004; Linares et al., 2010). These findings indicate that the T3SS of P. aeruginosa is tuned by various environmental stresses, which might be an important survival strategy for this microorganism.

In addition to environmental stresses, other signaling pathways also control the T3SS. The development of acute versus chronic infection has been shown to be controlled by the hybrid sensor kinases LadS and RetS, although the cognate signals are unknown. retS mutation reduced T3SS expression and increased biofilm formation (Goodman et al., 2004; Laskowski et al., 2004). In contrast, LadS had a negative impact on T3SS gene expression but a positive effect on biofilm formation (Ventre et al., 2006). Thus, RetS and LadS are thought to act reciprocally to control the switch between acute and chronic infection (Ventre et al., 2006; Goodman et al., 2009). Moreover, both RetS and LadS interact with another two-component system GacS/GacA, in which GacS is the sensor kinase and GacA is the response regulator. RetS inhibits GacS by forming a RetS/GacS heterodimer and, blocking phosphor transfer from GacS to GacA, however, how LadS interacts with GacS/GacA is not yet known (Goodman et al., 2009). GacS/GacA positively regulates the expression of two small RNAs (sRNAs), RsmY and RsmZ (Kay et al., 2006; Brencic et al., 2009), which are antagonists of the RNA binding regulator RsmA. Upregulation of RsmY and RsmZ leads to T3SS inhibition and a hyperbiofilm phenotype (Brencic et al., 2009; Bordi et al., 2010). RsmA is a global post-transcriptional regulatory protein, which controls the switch between T3SS activation and biofilm formation (Mulcahy et al., 2006; Irie et al., 2010; Kulkarni et al., 2014) and indirectly controls T3SS in mucoid P. aeruginosa (Intile et al., 2014). Although the functions of the T3SS in P. aeruginosa have been widely studied, the regulatory mechanisms still remain elusive. In this study, we identified tspR as an essential gene for T3SS expression in P. aeruginosa. In vivo studies indicate that TspR plays an important role in P. aeruginosa pathogenesis. TspR influences the expression of the master T3SS regulator ExsA at transcriptional and post-transcriptional level. Our studies demonstrated that tspR and retS mutants have similar phenotypes, such as inhibition of T3SS activity and induction of hyperbiofilm formation. In addition, TspR negatively controls two sRNAs, RsmY and RsmZ, and consequently the T3SS. This study reports a new gene involved in the T3SS regulatory network that controls acute and chronic P. aeruginosa infections.

Materials and Methods

Strains, Plasmids, and Growth Conditions

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table . P. aeruginosa PAO1 and derivatives were grown at 37°C on LB agar plates or in LB broth with shaking at 220 rpm unless otherwise specified. LB was used as a T3SS non-inducing medium and LB supplemented with 5 mM EGTA and 20 mM MgCl2 as a T3SS inducing medium (calcium-deplete). Antibiotics were used at the following concentrations: for Escherichia coli, gentamicin (Gm) at 15 μg/ml, ampicillin at 100 μg/ml, and tetracycline 10 μg/ml; for P. aeruginosa, gentamicin at 50 μg/ml in LB or 150 μg/ml in PIA (Pseudomonas Isolate Agar); tetracycline at 150 μg/ml in LB or 300 μg/ml in PIA and carbenicillin at 500 μg/ml in LB.

Transposon Mutagenesis Library

The transposon mutagenesis library was constructed as previously described except some modifications (Kulasekara et al., 2005). Briefly, the donor strain (E. coli SM10) containing pBT20, and the recipient strain PAO1(CTX-exoS-lux; Liang et al., 2014) were scraped from overnight-incubated plates before the cells were collected. The cells were resuspended in LB and spotted on a fresh LB agar plate at a ratio of 2:1. After incubation for 2 h, the mixed culture was diluted and spread on PIA (Pseudomonas isolation agar) plates containing Gm at 150 μg/ml. A transposon mutant library was constructed by picking 8,000 colonies grown on the selective plates (PIA + 150 μg/ml Gm). After overnight incubation, colonies with changed activities of CTX-exoS-lux under a Tannon imaging system (Tannon 5500) were collected.

To further screen for genes tuning exoS-lux expression, the random mutant library was cultured overnight in LB medium supplemented with Gm at 50 μg/ml. Three additional re-screens were performed to eliminate false-positive clones. During re-screening, the overnight cultures were diluted 1:300 in the appropriate media in 96-well clear-bottom black plates (Costar 9520, Corning) and were assayed for both luminescence and absorbance over the experimental time course. The transposon insertion sites of the selected mutants were determined by an arbitrary primed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and subsequent sequencing of the PCR products.

Construction of Plasmids

To construct the p-tspR and p-retS plasmids, the fragments of tspR and retS were respectively amplified by PCR with the corresponding primer pairs: Com-tspR-S/Com-tspR-A and Com-retS-S/Com-retS-A. The PCR products were digested with the indicated enzymes and cloned into PAK1900 (Wolfe, 2005).

The plasmid pMS402 carrying a promoter-less luxCDABE reporter gene cluster was used to construct promoter-luxCDABE reporter fusions as described previously (Duan et al., 2003; Liang et al., 2011). For generating tspR-lux, the tspR promoter region (-522 to +77 from tspR translational starting site) was amplified by PCR using the primers tspR-lux-S (with XhoI site) and tspR-lux-A (with BamHI site). The PCR products were cloned into the pMS402, yielding PtspR-lux. Besides the plasmid-based reporter system, an integration plasmid CTX6.1 originating from plasmid mini-CTX-lux was used to construct chromosomal fusion reporter. The pMS402 fragment containing the kanamycin-resistance marker, the multiple cloning sites (MCSs), and the promoter-luxCDABE reporter cassette was then isolated and ligated into CTX6.1, yielding tspR-lux. The plasmid generated was first transferred into E. coli SM10-λ pir and the P. aeruginosa reporter integration strain was obtained using bi-parental mating as previously reported (Hoang et al., 2000). The same procedures were used for generating other promoter-lux fusions except the different primers (Supplementary Table ). All constructs were sequenced to verify that no mutations occurred in these constructs.

Luminescence Screening Assays

The expression of the lux-based reporters from bacteria grown in liquid culture was measured as counts per second of light production using a Synergy 2 Plate Reader (BioTek) as previously described (Liang et al., 2008). Overnight cultures of the reporter strains were diluted to an OD600 of 0.2 and shaken for an additional 2 h before use. The cultures were inoculated into parallel wells of a black 96-well plate with a transparent bottom. A 5-μl volume of the fresh culture was inoculated into the wells containing a total volume of 95-μl mediums, which made the OD600 around 0.07. A 60-μl volume of filter-sterilized mineral oil was added to each well to prevent evaporation during the assay. Promoter activities were measured every 30 min for a 24 h course. Bacterial growth was monitored at the same time by measuring the OD at 595 nm.

Construction of P. aeruginosa tspR::Gm, exsA::Gm, retS::Gm, rsmY::Gm, rsmZ::Gm, rsmY::Gm/tspR::Tc, rsmZ::Gm/tspR::Tc Mutants

For construction of gene knockout mutants, a SacB-based strategy was employed as previously described (Hoang et al., 1998; Liang et al., 2014). To construct the tspR null mutant (ΔtspR), PCRs were performed to amplify sequences upstream (1959 bp) and downstream (1463 bp) of the intended deletion. The upstream fragment was amplified from PAO1 genomic DNA using primer pair, pEX-tspR-up-S and pEX-tspR-up-A, while the downstream fragment was amplified with primer pair, pEX-tspR-down-S and pEX-tspR-down-A (Supplementary Table ). The two PCR products were digested and then cloned into BamHI/HindIII-digested gene replacement vector pEX18Ap, yielding pEX18Ap-tspR. A 0.9 kb gentamicin resistance cassette cut from pPS858 with XbaI was cloned into pEX18Ap-tspR, yielding pEX18Ap-tspR-Gm. The resultant plasmids were electroporated into PAO1 with selection for gentamicin resistance. Colonies showing both gentamicin resistance and loss of sucrose (5%) susceptibility were selected on LB agar plates containing 50 μg/ml of gentamicin and 5% sucrose, which typically indicates a double-crossover event and thus of gene replacement occurring. The pEX18Ap-tspR-Tc was constructed by a similar strategy as described above. A 2.3 kb tetracycline resistance cassette was amplified from integration vector mini-CTX-lacZ with primer pair Tc-S/Tc-A (with XbaI site; Supplementary Table ) for replacing the tspR gene in PAO1. The tspR::Tc mutant was further confirmed by PCR. The exsA::Gm, retS::Gm, rsmY::Gm and rsmZ::Gm mutants (contains the Gm marker) were generated by a similar strategy with deletion of the tspR gene in PAO1.

For generating tspR/rsmY, tspR/rsmZ double mutants (rsmY::Gm/tspR::Tc, rsmZ::Gm/tspR::Tc), the tspR gene in ΔrsmY, ΔrsmZ mutant was deleted by a similar strategy with plasmid pEX18Ap-tspR-Tc. These resultant mutants were verified by PCR.

Cytotoxicity Assay

Bacterial cytotoxicity was determined by measuring the detachment of the A549 cells after P. aeruginosa infection as previously described (Wu and Jin, 2005; Li et al., 2013) with minor modifications. The human A549 lung epithelial cells (6 × 105) were seeded into each well of a 12-well plate. The cells were cultured in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 24 h. Overnight bacterial culture was subcultured in fresh LB to the log phase before infection. Subsequently, bacterial were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended in PBS. A549 cells were then infected with the bacteria at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 20. After 4 h infection, the culture medium in each well was aspirated. Cells were washed three times with PBS and stained with 200 μl 0.1% crystal violet (CV)-10% ethanol for 15 min at 37°C. The staining solution was discarded, and the plates were washed twice with 1 ml water. A-250 μl volume of 95% ethanol was then added into each well, and the reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 min with gentle shaking. The ethanol solution with dissolved CV dye was subjected to measurement of absorbance at a wavelength of 590 nM. To observe the morphology phenotype of A549 cells infected after P. aeruginosa, the cells fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, washed three times with PBS, and dyed by Giemsa stain for about 12 min. Cells were observed under microscope.

Western Blot Analysis

Overnight cultures of the tested strains were transformed into the same fresh LB medium or with 5 mM EGTA and 20 mM MgCl2 to an A600 of 0.02 and cultivated for additional 3 h. 100-μl cultures were centrifuged and the pellets were resuspended in 10 μl PBS. Bacterial cells were loaded and separated by 12% SDS-PAGE. The proteins were transferred onto a PVDF membrane and hybridized with a rabbit polyclonal ExoS antibody (1: 2000 dilutions, from Shouguang Jin and Weihui Wu’s Laboratory) or a mouse monoclonal FLAG antibody (Sigma). The signal was detected by an ECL Plus kit (Amersham Biosciences).

Biofilm Formation Assay

Biofilm formation was measured in a static system as previously described (O’Toole and Kolter, 1998) with minor modifications. Visualization of biofilm formation was carried out in 15-mL borosilicate tubes. Briefly, Cells from overnight cultures were inoculated at 1:100 dilutions into LB medium supplemented with appropriate antibiotics and grown at 30°C for 8 h. Biofilms were stained with 0.1% CV and tubes were washed with water to remove unbound dye.

Quantification of biofilm formation was performed in 24-well polystyrene microtiter plates. LB and appropriate antibiotics was inoculated to a final OD600 of 0.01. The plates were incubated for 8 or 20 h at 30°C. CV was added to each tube and stained for 15 min prior to removal by aspiration. Wells were rinsed three times by submerging the tubes in distilled water, and the remaining CV was dissolved in 1 ml of 95% ethanol. A 1 ml portion of this solution was transferred to a new polystyrene tube, and the absorbance was measured at 600 nm.

Swarming Motility Assay

Bacterial swarming motility was assessed as described previously (Rashid and Kornberg, 2000) with slight modification. The medium used for the swarming motility assay consisted of 0.5% agar, 8 g/L nutrient broth mix, and 5 g/L glucose. Bacteria were spot inoculated onto plates as 2 μl aliquots taken directly from overnight LB cultures. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 12 h. Photographs were taken with the Tanon 2500 imaging system.

Murine Acute Pneumonia Model

Bacteria were grown overnight in LB broth at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm. The next day, the bacteria were pelleted by centrifugation at 5,000 × g and suspended in 10 ml of fresh LB broth and allowed to grow until the mid-logarithmic phase. OD600 nm was measured; density was adjusted to OD ≈0.25. C57BL6 mice were purchased from the Harlan Laboratory (Indianapolis, IN, USA). The animal experiments have been approved by the University of North Dakota institutional animal care and use committee (UND IACUC Approval #1204-4). Mice were randomly assigned to different groups (six each group), and were lightly anesthetized with 20 mg/kg ketamine plus 5 mg/kg diazepam. Then we intranasally instilled 5 × 107 colony-forming units (CFUs) of P. aeruginosa and monitored the animals with infection for up to 120 h. Intranasal instillation of equal amount of PBS was performed as controls. Moribund mice were euthanized to obtain the lung for analysis. Survival of the mice was monitored for 5 days after the infection.

Results

Identification of P. aeruginosa Mutants with Altered exoS Expression

Pseudomonas aeruginosa utilizes the T3SS to translocate four effectors, ExoS, ExoY, ExoT and ExoU, into the cytoplasm of host cells. Changes in the expression of the T3SS often alter disease progression. To investigate the regulatory mechanism of the T3SS, we constructed a transposon insertion library in a wild-type PAO1 strain containing an exoS-lux transcriptional reporter integrated into the chromosome at the vacant phage CTX attachment site and screened for mutants with altered exoS-lux expression. Fifteen mutants were selected and the insertion sites were determined by arbitrary primed PCR and DNA sequencing. The mutated genes are listed in Table .

Among these 15 genes, transposon insertion into three genes caused increased expression of exoS, and insertion into 12 genes caused decreased expression. As expected, a group of known T3SS modulators including PcrD, PscC and ExsA, were also isolated (Yahr et al., 1997). clpS encodes an ATP-dependent Clp protease adaptor that is associated with antibiotic resistance, motility, and biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa (Fernandez et al., 2012). ClpS may interact with a protein (s) that controls T3SS expression and is degraded by ClpAP protease. Consistent with our findings, the AraC-family transcriptional regulator VqsM directly binds to the promoter region of the master regulator ExsA, and regulates T3SS expression (Liang et al., 2014). PA0265 (gabD) and PA2550 are involved in amino acid metabolism, while NuoL and ShaC are associated with energy metabolism. These results are consistent with previous studies showing that metabolic imbalance leads to T3SS inhibition (Dacheux et al., 2002; Rietsch et al., 2004). DeaD is an RNA helicase that stimulates ExsA translation to promote expression of the T3SS (Intile et al., 2015). We also observed that disruption of fimV in P. aeruginosa reduced exoS activity. FimV positively regulates twitching and type II secretion system when grown on solid medium as well as intracellular cAMP levels (Semmler et al., 2000; Fulcher et al., 2010; Michel et al., 2011). FimV may regulate T3SS expression by controlling intracellular cAMP concentrations. Finally, PA0716, PA3284, PA4857, and PA5264 encode hypothetical proteins, whose detailed effects on T3SS regulation need to be further investigated.

TspR is Required for T3SS Expression, Biofilm Formation, and Bacterial Motility

Among the 15 genes that regulate T3SS, we investigated the role of PA4857, which we designated as Type III secretion system and pathogenesis Regulator (tspR), in T3SS regulation. tspR is located immediately downstream of retS, a known regulator of T3SS gene expression and biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa (Goodman et al., 2004; Laskowski et al., 2004). To verify if tspR mutation decreased exoS expression, we generated a chromosomal tspR mutation (tspR::Gm) in PAO1 strain, and measured exoS promoter activity in this mutated strain. Expectedly, the levels of exoS transcription were reduced by about threefold in the tspR mutated strain compared to the levels in the wild-type strain, which is consistent with observation in the original tspR transposon mutant (Figure ). Introduction of a plasmid expressing TspR (p-tspR) into the tspR::Gm strain restored exoS-lux activity to wild-type levels (Figure ). To further confirm the role of TspR in the regulation of exoS expression, Western-blotting was used to measure the levels of ExoS protein in the wild-type PAO1, tspR::Gm, and transposon mutant (tspR::Tn) strains, as well as their corresponding complemented strains (tspR::Gm/p-tspR, and tspR::Tn/p-tspR). As shown in Figure , lower levels of ExoS were detected in the tspR::Gm and tspR::Tn mutant strains than in the wild-type strain. In the complemented strains, ExoS expression was restored to wild-type levels. These results clearly indicate that TspR is a positive modulator of T3SS expression.

TspR is required for the expression of T3SS genes. (A) The expression of exoS-lux was measured in the wild-type PAO1, tspR::Gm, and the complemented tspR::Gm strain (tspR::Gm/p-tspR), the tspR transposon strain (tspR::Tn), and the tspR::Tn complemented strain (tspR::Tn/p-tspR). The asterisks indicate the statistically different exoS expression compared to that in the wild-type strain as determined by Student’s t-test (∗∗∗P < 0.001). (B) The expression and secretion of ExoS were examined in the indicated strains by Western-blotting. Strains were grown in LB with EGTA to an OD600 = 0.6. Whole-cell extracts from the designated strains were separated by SDS-PAGE and immuno-blotted. (C) Effect of tspR mutation on swarming motility. Overnight cultures were spotted onto swarming plates (2 μl aliquots) and the plates were incubated at 37°C. The images captured after 16 h of growth. The experiments were repeated at least three times and similar results were observed. (D) TspR is required for biofilm formation. Quantification of crystal violet (CV) staining of biofilms was grown in microtiter plates for 14 h. ∗∗P < 0.005 based on Student’s t-test. Photo of the tube binding assay was taken. EV, empty vector.

To define the function of TspR, its effects on biofilm formation and bacterial motility were also examined. Mutation of tspR resulted in reduced swarming motility (Figure ) and increased biofilm formation, as evidenced by the results of static CV and tube binding assays (Figure ). These phenotypes are consistent with those previously reported in the retS mutant (Goodman et al., 2004), suggesting that tspR and retS may be involved in the same regulatory pathway.

Deletion of tspR Diminishes Cytotoxicity and Reduces Virulence in a Mouse Model of Acute Pneumonia

Since deletion of tspR significantly compromised the expression of T3SS genes, and bacterial motility (Figure ), T3SS-mediated cytotoxicity was examined by measuring cells remaining attached after infection. A549 cells were infected with the wild-type PAO1, the tspR::Gm strain, or the complemented strain (tspR::Gm/p-tspR) at a MOI of 20. After 4 h post-infection, the majority of the cells were rounded and detached. As shown in Figure , mutation of tspR rendered less cytotoxicity than the wild-type strain, and complementation with a tspR gene restored the cytotoxicity. Moreover, few living A549 cells could be observed under microscope 4 h after infection with the wild-type PAO1 strain, while most A549 cells remained alive after infected with the tspR::Gm strain (Figure ). These results demonstrated that the loss of tspR attenuates the cytotoxicity of P. aeruginosa, further verifying its impact on T3SS.

Mutation of (A) Cytotoxicity of the P. aeruginosa and its derivates. A549 cells were infected with the indicated strains at a MOI of 20. At 4 h post-infection, cells attached to the plate were measured with CV staining. Results represent mean ± SD, and data are representative of three independent experiments. (B) Microscopy images of A549 cells infected with the indicated strains. The control (CK) was an uninfected A549 culture. (C) The tspR mutation reduced the virulence of P. aeruginosa. C57BL6 mice were intranasally challenged with the wild-type strain, the tspR::Gm strain, and the complemented tspR::Gm strain at 5 × 107 CFU in 50 μl of PBS, and moribund mice were killed to determine survival (Kaplan–Meier Curve with Log-Rank test, P = 0.0028, n = 6).

Chronic P. aeruginosa lung infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis patients. To further investigate the importance of TspR in pulmonary infection, C57BL/6 mice were infected intranasally with approximately 5 × 107 cells of the wild-type, tspR::Gm or complemented (tspR::Gm/p-tspR) strains. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that mutation of tspR significantly improved mouse survival compared to that of mice infected with the wild-type strain. Mice infected with the tspR::Gm strain exhibited significantly decreased mortality with no death until 115 h post-infection and more than 80% of mice surviving at 120 h. In contrast, wild-type PAO1 infection resulted in 50 and 100% mortality at 24 and 60 h post-inoculation, respectively (Figure ). Complementation of the deletion strain (tspR::Gm/p-tspR) partially restored the lethal infection phenotype to the wild-type level. Taken together, these results clearly demonstrated that TspR is essential for the virulence of P. aeruginosa in a mouse model of acute infection.

TspR Controls the Expression of ExsA at the Transcriptional and Post-transcriptional Level

Expression of the T3SS genes is finely tuned by multiple environmental conditions. The two best known signals for T3SS gene expression are contact with host cells and extracellular calcium (Ca2+) concentrations in the micromolar range (Frank, 1997; Vallis et al., 1999). In addition, T3SS expression is controlled by a complex regulatory network. Previous studies have shown that all T3SS genes are under the direct transcriptional control of ExsA, an AraC-family regulator (Hovey and Frank, 1995). Given that the expression of T3SS was also controlled by tspR, we hypothesized that TspR is epistatic of ExsA and regulates T3SS gene expression. exsA is co-transcribed with exsC, exsE, and exsB in the same operon, which is driven by a promoter upstream of exsC. Moreover, the expression of exsC is also controlled by ExsA (Yahr and Frank, 1994). Thus, we measured the expression of the exsC-lux fusion PexsC-lux in the wild-type and tspR::Gm strains. As shown in Figure , expression of PexsC-lux was reduced in the tspR::Gm strain compared to that in the wild-type strain, and complementation with the tspR gene partially restored exsC promoter activity (Figure ), which indicates that TspR is involved in the regulation of exsCEBA operon expression.

TspR affects expression of the (A) The activity of PexsC-lux was determined in the wild-type and the tspR::Gm strains. The results shown are the average of triplicate experiments. Error bars indicate the standard deviations. EV, empty vector. (B) exsA-FLAGs constructs. Ptac represents a tac promoter. (C) Western-blotting showing the expression levels of ExsA-FLAG under T3SS-inducing conditions in the exsA and tspR mutants.

We also observed that the decreased expression of exsC in the tspR::Gm strain was not due to a reduced exsA mRNA or protein level (data not shown). Thus, we attempted to test whether the inhibition of exsCEBA transcription observed in the tspR mutant might be due to reduced exsA expression at the post-transcriptional level. To this end, we transformed two exsA-FLAG fusions with different exsA upstream regions, exsA-FLAG-S and exsA-FLAG-A (Figure ; Li et al., 2013), into an exsA mutant or the tspR mutant. Expression of ExsA-FLAG was then examined under T3SS-inducing conditions. As shown in Figure , ExsA-FLAG protein levels (from the exsA-Flag-A construct) in the exsA::Gm and tspR::Gm strains were similar, suggesting that Ptac activity is not affected by the tspR mutation. However, when the exsA endogenous ribosome binding site and neighboring regions were included in the construct (exsA-Flag-S), the expression levels of ExsA-FLAG were reduced in the tspR mutant compared to those in the exsA mutant (Figure ). These results indicated that TspR controls the expression of ExsA at the post-transcriptional level.

RetS is Required for the tspR Expression

In addition to ExsA, the RetS and LadS sensor proteins also regulate T3SS expression in P. aeruginosa. Deletion of retS compromised T3SS genes expression and T3SS-dependent host cell cytotoxicity, but increased biofilm formation (Goodman et al., 2004; Laskowski et al., 2004). Interestingly, the tspR gene is located next to retS on the chromosome, which led us to investigate the possible interaction between tspR and retS. To this end, we constructed a retS promoter-lux fusion (retS-lux) and measured retS-lux activity in the wild-type and tspR::Gm strains. As shown in Figure , the expression of retS-lux in the tspR::Gm strain was the same as that in the wild-type strain. We then examined the impact of RetS on tspR-lux expression. The activity of tspR-lux was about threefold lower in the retS::Gm strain than in the wild-type (Figure ), indicating that retS is a positive regulator of tspR expression.

RetS tunes the expression of (A) TspR had no effect on retS expression. The level of retS transcription was measured in the wild-type and tspR::Gm strains. The results shown are the mean ± SD, and data are representative from three independent experiments. (B) RetS positively regulates the activity of tspR. The activity of the tspR promoter-lux fusion (tspR-lux) in the wild-type, retS::Gm and retS::Gm complemented strains were measured. ∗∗P < 0.005 between the wild-type and retS mutant by Student’s t-test. (C) The expression of exoS in the indicated strains (∗∗∗P < 0.001). (D) Overexpression of tspR in the retS::Gm mutant restored the expression of ExoS to wild-type levels. Indicated strains were grown in LB with or without EGTA to an OD600 = 0.6. Whole-cell extracts from the designated strains were separated by SDS-PAGE separation and subjected to Western-blotting. EV represents empty vector.

Given that retS positively regulates the expression of both T3SS genes and tspR, we next examined whether the reduced exoS-lux activity observed in the retS::Gm strain could be restored by the expression of tspR. To this end, exoS-lux activity was measured in the wild-type, tspR::Gm, and tspR::Gm complemented (tspR::Gm/p-tspR) strains, as well as the retS::Gm mutant, and the retS::Gm strain carrying a p-tspR plasmid. As expected, the decreased exoS level in the ΔretS strain could be restored by tspR overexpression (Figure ). This observation was also confirmed by the Western-blot analysis with an antibody against ExoS (Figure ). In summary, these results indicated that tspR partially controls the RetS-mediated regulatory pathways.

TspR Functions through Two Small RNAs RsmY an RsmZ

As aforementioned, RetS is a positive regulator of tspR expression (Figure ). Previous studies have shown that the RetS-RsmA pathway mainly regulates T3SS and type VI secretion system (T6SS) genes by modulating the levels of two small RNAs RsmY and RsmZ (Goodman et al., 2004; Ventre et al., 2006), this made us wonder if TspR may play a role in the transcription of rsmY and rsmZ. To address this hypothesis, two promoter-lux fusions, rsmY-lux and rsmZ-lux, were constructed, and their activities were measured in the tspR::Gm and the wild-type strains. As shown in Figure , rsmY and rsmZ promoter activities were much higher in the tspR::Gm strain than in the wild-type strain, indicating that TspR is a negative regulator of these two sRNAs.

Two small RNAs, RsmY and RsmZ, are involved in (A) The expression of rsmY-lux and rsmZ-lux was strongly induced in the tspR::Gm strain compared to that in the wild-type strain. ∗∗P < 0.005 compared to the wild-type by Student’s t-test. (B) Mutantion of tspR in the rsmY::Gm or rsmZ::Gm strain reduced the levels of exoS. Results shown are the average of triplicate experiments. Error bars indicate SD. (C) The roles of RsmY and RsmZ in tspR-mediated T3SS gene expression. The indicated strains were grown in LB with or without EGTA to an OD600 = 0.6. Whole-cell extracts from the designated strains were separated by SDS-PAGE and subjected to subsequent Western-blotting. EV represents empty vector.

Since tspR regulates RsmY/Z, which controls T3SS genes expression, we sought to determine whether tspR regulates the expression of T3SS genes through RsmY or RsmZ. To this end, two single mutants (rsmY::Gm and rsmZ::Gm) and two double mutants (rsmY::Gm/tspR::Tc and rsmZ::Gm/tspR::Tc) were constructed. exoS promoter activity was evaluated in seven strains, including the wild-type, tspR::Gm, and tspR::Gm complemented with p-tspR, rsmY::Gm, rsmZ::Gm, rsmY::Gm/tspR::Tc and rsmZ::Gm/tspR::Tc strains. As expected, the level of exoS-lux was much higher in the rsmY::Gm and rsmZ::Gm strains, but was much lower in the tspR::Gm strain (Figure ). Interestingly, mutation of rsmY or rsmZ in the tspR::Gm background restored the expression of exoS to wild-type levels. We confirmed the above observations by Western-blot analysis with anti-ExoS antibody in the indicated strains (Figure ). Taken together, these results suggest that these two sRNAs, RsmY and RsmZ, play a role in pathway by which tspR regulates the T3SS.

RetS-RsmY/Z is Involved in the tspR-Mediated Regulation of Biofilm Formation

The RetS-GacS/A-RsmY/Z-RsmA regulatory pathway reciprocally regulates the expression of virulence factors associated with acute and chronic infections, including the T3SS, the T6SS, and biofilm formation. Overexpression of RsmY/Z as well as deletion of retS or rsmA in the wild-type strain results in hyperbiofilm formation (Brencic et al., 2009). The decreased expression of tspR observed in the retS::Gm strain led us to examine whether hyperbiofilm formation of the retS::Gm strain is dependent on tspR expression. We found that the increased biofilm formation of the retS::Gm strain could be restored to wild-type levels by overexpression tspR. In contrast, tspR negatively regulates RsmY and RsmZ (Figure ). Our data further showed that mutation of RsmY or RsmZ in the tspR::Gm strain abolished the hyperbiofilm phenotype (Figure ). Taken together, these results suggest that RetS-RsmY/Z is involved in tspR-mediated regulation of biofilm formation.

Quantification of CV staining of biofilms grown in microtiter plates for 14 h. ∗P < 0.01 and ∗∗P < 0.005 compared to the wild-type strain based on Student’s t-test. Photos of the tubes binding assay of the indicated strains were taken. EV, empty vector.

Discussion

In the past few years, remarkable progress has been made in our understanding of the structure and function of the T3SS in P. aeruginosa and other pathogenic bacteria. However, the networks regulating T3SS are not yet well-understood. In the present study, we constructed a transposon mutagenesis library and identified 15 genes that are associated with T3SS expression. As expected, mutation of exsA, pscC, or pcrD resulted in reduced expression of the T3SS genes (Yahr et al., 1997). We also found that NuoL and ShaC are required for T3SS activity. These proteins are involved in the metabolism of amino acids, energy and nucleotides, which are consistent with previous reports showing that metabolic stresses inhibit the T3SS expression (Linares et al., 2010; Diaz et al., 2011). Recently, an ATP-dependent RNA helicase (deaD) was shown to be involved in T3SS expression through the control of ExsA translation (Intile et al., 2015). Interestingly, ClpS, an ATP-dependent protease adaptor, negatively regulates the expression of T3SS. ClpS is known to recognize and bind to specific substrates, and then delivers them to the ClpAP complex for degradation (Erbse et al., 2006; Roman-Hernandez et al., 2011). Thus, we hypothesize that the ClpS-ClpAP system regulates T3SS by modulating the stability of key T3SS transcriptional regulators such as ExsA, GacA, or Vfr. However, a complete understanding of the detailed functions and regulatory mechanisms of these require further investigation. We also observed that the fimV mutant was unable to induce the expression of T3SS genes under type III inducing condition. Given that FimV facilitates the secretion of T2SS substrates on solid medium (Michel et al., 2011) and positively regulates the levels of intracellular cAMP (Fulcher et al., 2010), cAMP might play a role in FimV-mediated T3SS expression. However, a group of genes that have been reported to control T3SS were not identified in our current study. There are at least two possible explanations for the omission of these genes in this transposon mutagenesis library. First is the non-random nature of Tn5 insertion, as some regions are preferred for the Tn5 insertion (Jacobs et al., 2003). Second, is that we screened 8,000 Tn insertion mutants, which just barely covers the whole P. aeruginosa genome.

We are interested in determining the roles of PA4857 (tspR), which encodes a hypothetical protein with an unknown function. On the chromosome, tspR is located next to retS, which encodes a hybrid kinase RetS that is required for T3SS expression and biofilm formation (Laskowski et al., 2004). TspR is homologous to the multiple antibiotic resistance protein MarC, which is found in a wide variety of bacterial species. Deletion of tspR reduced T3SS activity and swarming motility, and promoted biofilm formation, indicating that tspR may play a central role in regulating the transition between acute and chronic infection. Moreover, our data also provided insights into the importance of tspR in the cytotoxicity of P. aeruginosa (Figures ). We also examined the role of tspR in virulence by using a mouse pulmonary infection model. Within 48 h, mice inoculated with the tspR::Gm strain had a significantly lower bacterial load than mice infected with the wild-type strain (Figure ). This loss of pathogenicity in the tspR::Gm strain confirmed the reduced activity of the T3SS genes (Figure ).

Expression of the T3SS genes is directly controlled by exsA (Hovey and Frank, 1995), which is the last gene of the exsCEBA operon which is itself strictly regulated by ExsA itself (Yahr and Frank, 1994). The expression of exsA is driven by a promoter upstream of exsC. In addition, the intergenic region between exsB and exsA also displayed a weak promoter activity, indicating that it may include a second promoter. This is supported by the identification of a potential transcriptional start site in front of exsA (Wurtzel et al., 2012). We also verified this observation in our previous study by showing that VqsM directly binds to and regulates the promoter upstream of exsA (Liang et al., 2014). To determine the impact of tspR on exsA expression, we constructed an exsA promoter-lux fusion (PexsC-lux, Supplementary Table ), and showed that the expression of PexsC-lux was lower in the tspR::Gm strain than in the wild-type strain (Figure ), which suggests that TspR is required for transcription of the exsCEBA operon. Moreover, we found that tspR controls the expression of ExsA at the post-transcriptional level (Figure ). These results demonstrated that TspR is involved in ExsA regulation, thus regulates T3SS.

In addition to modulating the translation of ExsA, tspR also regulates two small RNAs RsmY and RsmZ (Figures ). As expected, deletion of rsmY or rsmZ in the tspR::Gm strain restored the activity of exoS-lux to wild-type levels (Figure ), indicating that these two sRNAs participate in tspR-mediated T3SS regulation. Moreover, our data showed that RetS, a regulator of exopolysaccharide and T3SS, also positively controls the expression of tspR (Figure ). Based on the results of previous studies and our data, we proposed that RetS positively regulates tspR expression, and TspR controls T3SS through the sRNAs, RsmY, and RsmZ or the master regulator ExsA (Figure ).

A schematic diagram showing that The potential regulatory pathways and interactions including tspR were proposed based on our observations and those of previous studies. RetS and GacS-GacA are two major systems involved in T3SS regulation. In the present study, we identified a modulator, TspR, which tunes T3SS expression through two small sRNAs (RsmY and RsmZ) or the master regulator ExsA. In addition, the activity of tspR was shown to be controlled by RetS (blue lines). The solid arrows indicate positive regulation and the solid T-bars present negative regulation.

The hallmark differences between acute and chronic P. aeruginosa infection are the expression of the T3SS genes and the genes associated with biofilm formation (Goodman et al., 2004). In the present study, TspR regulated both T3SS and biofilm formation. Further studies will be focused on the roles of tspR in the transition between acute and chronic infections as well as its genome-wide functions. The findings of this study improved our understanding of the complicated network underlying the regulation of T3SS, and may aid in the design of novel therapeutic strategies that interfere with the expression of T3SS genes and control the pathogenicity of P. aeruginosa.

Author Contributions

MZ and HL conceived and designed the experiments. MZ, JZ, HK, and WK performed the experiments. MZ and HL analyzed the data. MZ and HL wrote the paper.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Table 1

List of mutants showing more than threefold changes in the exoS-lux expression.

Gene name or number	Insertion site	Protein description	Max foldb
PA0716/PA0717	788912	Hypothetical protein	3.4
PA2621 (clpS)	2964732	ATP-dependent Clp protease adaptor	7.2
PA3284	3676853	Hypothetical protein	6.0
PA0265 (gabD)	300415	Succinate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase	-6.5
PA1056 (shaC)	1146026	Proton transport	-4.0
PA1703 (pcrD)	1850681	Type III secretory apparatus protein	-7.0
PA1713 (exsA)	1857602	Transcriptional regulator ExsA	NEa
PA1716 (pscC)	1860621	Type III secretion outer membrane protein PscC precursor	-7.5
PA2227 (vqsM)	2449253	AraC-type transcriptional regulator	-5.6
PA2550	2882043	Probable acyl-CoA dehydrogenase	-5.8
PA2647 (nuoL)	2993165	NADH dehydrogenase I chain L	-3.5
PA2840 (deaD)	3194769	Probable ATP-dependent RNA helicase	-10
PA3115 (fimV)	3498191	Motility protein FimV	-11
PA4857 (tspR)	5455890	Hypothetical protein	-4.5
PA5264	5926218	Hypothetical protein	-4.7