| Literature DB >> 22131985 |
Belinda C Ferrari1, Chengdong Zhang, Josie van Dorst.
Abstract
Novel cultivation strategies for bacteria are widespread and well described for recovering greater diversity from the "hitherto" unculturable majority. While similar approaches have not yet been demonstrated for fungi it has been suggested that of the 1.5 million estimated species less than 5% have been recovered into pure culture. Fungi are known to be involved in many degradative processes, including the breakdown of petroleum hydrocarbons, and it has been speculated that in Polar Regions they contribute significantly to bioremediation of contaminated soils. Given the biotechnological potential of fungi there is a need to increase efforts for greater species recovery, particularly from extreme environments such as sub-Antarctic Macquarie Island. In this study, like the yet-to-be cultured bacteria, high concentrations of nutrients selected for predominantly different fungal species to that recovered using a low nutrient media. By combining both media approaches to the cultivation of fungi from contaminated and non-contaminated soils, 91 fungal species were recovered, including 63 unidentified species. A preliminary biodegradation activity assay on a selection of isolates found that a high proportion of novel and described fungal species from a range of soil samples were capable of hydrocarbon degradation and should be characterized further.Entities:
Keywords: diversity; fungi; hydrocarbon degradation; novel cultivation; soil; sub-Antarctic
Year: 2011 PMID: 22131985 PMCID: PMC3219075 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00217
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Total petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in spiked soil samples (mg kg.
| Nominal SAB concentration | Final TPH concentration |
|---|---|
| 0 | <50 |
| 50 | <50 |
| 100 | <50 |
| 250 | 84 |
| 500 | 247 |
| 1,000 | 628 |
| 10,000 | 9,744 |
| 20,000 | 15,030 |
Primer sets used for ITS gene PCR amplification and sequencing.
| Primer | Sequence | Target gene | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ITS1 | 5′-TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G-3′ | Fungal ITS | White et al. ( |
| ITS4 | 5′-TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC-3′ | Fungal ITS | White et al. ( |
| NSI1 | 5′-GAT TGA ATG GCT TAG TGA GG-3′ | Fungal ITS | Martin and Rygiewicz ( |
| NLB4 | 5′-GGA TTC TCA CCC TCT ATG AC-3′ | Fungal ITS | Martin and Rygiewicz ( |
Molecular and morphologic identification, ITS sequence matches, and isolation frequency for fungal isolates recovered from contaminated and non-contaminated Macquarie Island soil.
| Isolate | SAB concentration in soil (mg/kg) | Identification | Closest match (accession number, % identity) | Closest cultured organism (accession number, % identity) | 1× | 0.1× | Total | % | Accession number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZ01 | 0; 50; 250; 500; 1000 | 266 | 216 | 482 | 4.97 | JN104511 | |||
| CZ02 | 0; 50; 100; 250; 500; 10000 | 91 | 294 | 385 | 3.97 | JN104512 | |||
| CZ29 | 100 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104536 | ||||
| CZ34 | 10000 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104538 | ||||
| CZ44 | 20000 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104547 | ||||
| CZ42 | 50; 100 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.07 | JN104545 | |||
| CZ81 | 500 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104572 | ||||
| CZ21 | 0; 50; 250 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104528 | ||||
| CZ64 | 250 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104558 | ||||
| CZ40 | 1000 | 3 | 3 | 0.03 | JN104543 | ||||
| CZ06 | 0; 50; 250; 500; 10000; 20000 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0.11 | JN104516 | |||
| CZ05 | 0; 50; 250; 500; 1000 | 130 | 48 | 178 | 1.84 | JN104515 | |||
| CZ20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104527 | ||||
| CZ55 | 250 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104553 | ||||
| CZ56 | 250 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104554 | ||||
| CZ38 | 10000 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104541 | ||||
| CZ78 | 0; 50; 250 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.05 | JN104570 | |||
| CZ90 | 50 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 0.12 | JN104578 | |||
| CZ08 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.07 | JN104517 | ||||
| CZ25 | 0; 50 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.03 | JN104532 | |||
| CZ19 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104526 | ||||
| CZ30 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 0.05 | JN104537 | ||||
| CZ22 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104529 | ||||
| CZ87 | 500 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104576 | ||||
| CZ26 | 0; 1000 | 2 | 2 | 0.02 | JN104533 | ||||
| CZ77 | 50 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104569 | ||||
| CZ14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104521 | ||||
| CZ23 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104530 | ||||
| CZ91 | 50 | 2 | 2 | 0.02 | JN104579 | ||||
| CZ37 | 10000 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104540 | ||||
| CZ36 | 10000 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104539 | ||||
| CZ39 | 1000 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104542 | ||||
| CZ51 | 250 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104551 | ||||
| CZ28 | 100 | 2 | 2 | 0.02 | JN104535 | ||||
| CZ48 | 250 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104550 | ||||
| CZ71 | 50 | 2 | 2 | 0.02 | JN104563 | ||||
| CZ03 | 50; 100; 250; 500; 1000; 10000; 20000 | 4613 | 3801 | 8414 | 86.75 | JN104513 | |||
| CZ60 | 250 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104556 | ||||
| CZ16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104523 | ||||
| CZ13 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.02 | JN104520 | ||||
| CZ17 | 0 | Unidentified fungus 02 | Fungal sp. HM439547.1 99% | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104524 | ||
| CZ18 | 0 | Unidentified fungus 03 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104525 | |||
| CZ15 | 0 | Unidentified fungus 05 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104522 | |||
| CZ76 | 50 | Unidentified fungus 07 | Fungal endophyte FN392308.1 98% | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104568 | ||
| CZ74 | 50 | Unidentified fungus 08 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104566 | |||
| CZ72 | 50 | Unidentified fungus 10 | 2 | 2 | 0.02 | JN104564 | |||
| CZ73 | 50 | Unidentified fungus 11 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104565 | |||
| CZ89 | 50 | Unidentified fungus 14 | Fungal sp. FJ235965.1 97% | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104577 | ||
| CZ11 | 0 | Unidentified fungus 16 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104519 | |||
| CZ58 | 250 | Unidentified fungus 18 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104555 | |||
| CZ43 | 50 | Unidentified fungus 41 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104546 | |||
| CZ09 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 0.16 | JN104518 | |||
| CZ04 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.05 | JN104514 | ||||
| CZ45 | 250 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104548 | ||||
| CZ63 | 0; 50; 250; 500 | 49 | 15 | 64 | 0.66 | JN104557 | |||
| CZ27 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.05 | JN104534 | ||||
| CZ86 | 500 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104575 | ||||
| CZ67 | 50 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104559 | ||||
| CZ68 | 50 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104560 | ||||
| CZ41 | 1000 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104544 | ||||
| CZ75 | 50 | Unidentified fungus 01 | 2 | 2 | 0.02 | JN104567 | |||
| CZ70 | 50 | Unidentified fungus 04 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104562 | |||
| CZ83 | 500 | Unidentified fungus 06 | 2 | 2 | 0.02 | JN104573 | |||
| CZ85 | 500 | Unidentified fungus 09 | Fungal sp. FJ609284.1 99% | 3 | 3 | 0.03 | JN104574 | ||
| CZ79 | 50 | Unidentified fungus 12 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104571 | |||
| CZ69 | 50 | Unidentified fungus 13 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104561 | |||
| CZ47 | 50; 100; 250 | Unidentified fungus 15 | 5 | 5 | 0.05 | JN104549 | |||
| CZ52 | 250 | Unidentified fungus 17 | 2 | 2 | 0.02 | JN104552 | |||
| CZ12 | 0 | Unidentified fungus 19 | Data not available | Data not available | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| CZ61 | 250 | Unidentified fungus 20 | Data not available | Data not available | 2 | 2 | 0.02 | ||
| CZ65 | 250 | Unidentified fungus 21 | Data not available | Data not available | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| CZ66 | 250 | Unidentified fungus 22 | Data not available | Data not available | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| CZ57 | 250 | Unidentified fungus 23 | Data not available | Data not available | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| CZ62 | 250 | Unidentified fungus 24 | Data not available | Data not available | 2 | 2 | 0.02 | ||
| CZ59 | 250 | Unidentified fungus 25 | Data not available | Data not available | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| CZ84 | 500 | Unidentified fungus 26 | Data not available | Data not available | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| CZ88 | 500 | Unidentified fungus 27 | Data not available | Data not available | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| CZ07 | 0 | Unidentified fungus 28 | Data not available | Data not available | 6 | 6 | 0.06 | ||
| CZ10 | 0 | Unidentified fungus 29 | Data not available | Data not available | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| CZ31 | 100 | Unidentified fungus 30 | Data not available | Data not available | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| CZ49 | 250 | Unidentified fungus 31 | Data not available | Data not available | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| CZ50 | 250 | Unidentified fungus 32 | Data not available | Data not available | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| CZ53 | 250 | Unidentified fungus 33 | Data not available | Data not available | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| CZ54 | 250 | Unidentified fungus 34 | Data not available | Data not available | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| CZ46 | 250 | Unidentified fungus 35 | Data not available | Data not available | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| CZ82 | 500 | Unidentified fungus 36 | Data not available | Data not available | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| CZ80 | 500 | Unidentified fungus 37 | Data not available | Data not available | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| CZ32 | 1000 | Unidentified fungus 38 | Data not available | Data not available | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| CZ33 | 1000 | Unidentified fungus 39 | Data not available | Data not available | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| CZ35 | 10000 | Unidentified fungus 40 | Data not available | Data not available | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| CZ24 | 10000 | Unidentified fungus 42 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | JN104531 | |||
| Total | 5227 | 4472 | 9699 | 100.00 | |||||
Figure 1Non-metric MDS configuration plot comparing the fungal diversity recovered from low or high nutrient media. Non-metric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS) plot of similarities calculated using the bray–curtis coefficient using square root transformed fungal diversity data. The NMDS plot includes superimposed clusters at similarity levels of 20% (blue line) and 60% (green line). Results confirmed that the selection of media did significantly alter the recovered species distribution due to a global R value of 0.542 and P value of 0.001. The SAB diesel fuel concentration within spiked soil samples resulted in an even greater effect on recovered species distribution as revealed by a global R value of 0.916 and P value of 0.001.
Diversity and abundance of fungal species recovered from soil using both a high and a low nutrient media approach to cultivation.
| High nutrient media | Low nutrient media | Combined media | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total isolates | 5,227 | 4,472 | 9,699 |
| Species richness | 52 | 50 | 91 |
| Species/soil sample | 9.6 ± 6.7 | 8.9 ± 6.2 | 9.3 ± 6.2 |
| Singletons | 32 | 29 | 61 |
| Unidentified fungi | 34 | 33 | 63 |
Figure 2Proportional distribution of fungal ITS sequences at the Class-level isolated from a range of SAB diesel fuel spiked soil samples. (A) The distribution of OTUs recovered on high nutrient media. (B) The distribution of OTUs recovered on low nutrient media. The fungal diversity recovered changed significantly as the concentration of SAB diesel fuel increased. The greatest level of diversity was observed in the uncontaminated soils for both media used. At low concentrations of SAB diesel fuel, a shift in fungal diversity was observed including a small proportion of unidentified species. While in the highly contaminated soil samples the diversity decreased and was limited to the Eurotiomycetes and Leotiomycetes class only.
Biodegradation activity of a selection of isolates with SAB diesel fuel as the sole carbon source.
| Fungal isolate | SAB concentration in soil | Biodegradation activity |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | − | |
| 0 | +++ | |
| 0 | + | |
| 0 | − | |
| 0; 50; 250; 500; 1000 | + | |
| 0; 50; 100; 250; 500; 1000 | ++ | |
| 50; 100; 250; 500; 1000; 10,000; 20,000 | ++ | |
| 0; 50; 250; 500; 1000 | ++ | |
| 0; 50; 250; 500; 10,000; 20,000 | + | |
| 10,000 | +++ | |
| 10,000 | +++ | |
| 10,000 | − |
*Soil sample each fungi was isolated from.
.