Literature DB >> 31579556

Characterization of Corneal Biomechanical Properties and Determination of Natural Intraocular Pressure Using CID-GAT.

Shu-Hao Lu1, I T Chong1, Stanley Y Y Leung1, David C C Lam1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The intraocular pressure (IOP) measured using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT) is confounded by individual corneal properties. We investigated a modified method that removes the confoundment by incorporating corneal properties into the Imbert-Fick's law is investigated.
METHOD: Porcine eyes were pressurized between 10 and 40 mm Hg using a manometer. The eyes were indented using a flat cylindrical indenter. A modified corneal indentation device (CID) procedure was used to obtain the corneal moduli Eqs . The calculated IOPNC from the Imbert-Fick's Law using the corneal moduli Eqs was compared to the natural IOPN, measured using pressure sensor inserted into the eye.
RESULTS: Test results showed that IOP-dependent corneal modulus Eqs is a primary confounding factor in IOP calculation. The average elastic modulus Eqs is 0.173 ± 0.018 MPa at 20 mm Hg, and increases with IOP at a linear rate of 0.0066 MPa per mm Hg (r = 0.997, P < 0.001). Incorporation of individual Eqs into IOPNC calculation showed that IOPNC are in good agreement with reference IOPN (slope = 0.999, r = 0.939, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The IOP-dependent corneal modulus Eqs is a primary confounding factor in IOP calculation. A modified CID-GAT procedure to obtain natural cornea-independent IOPNC is developed and verified in this study. The CID-GAT IOP modification may be used in place of conventional GAT when the confounding effects in eyes with atypical cornea (e.g., laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis [LASIK] thinned) are significant. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Confoundment from corneal properties results in IOP measurement errors. The study showed that the CID-GAT method can significantly reduce the confounding corneal errors. Copyright 2019 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanical properties; confounding factors; corneal modulus; intraocular pressure; porcine eyes

Year:  2019        PMID: 31579556      PMCID: PMC6743645          DOI: 10.1167/tvst.8.5.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol        ISSN: 2164-2591            Impact factor:   3.283


  24 in total

1.  Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness.

Authors:  N Ehlers; T Bramsen; S Sperling
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1975-03

2.  Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry.

Authors:  Jay S Pepose; Susan K Feigenbaum; Mujtaba A Qazi; Jeffrey P Sanderson; Cynthia J Roberts
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Determination of the true intraocular pressure and modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo.

Authors:  G J Orssengo; D C Pye
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.758

4.  Hydration dependent biomechanical properties of the corneal stroma.

Authors:  Hamed Hatami-Marbini; Ebitimi Etebu
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  Individual-specific tonometry on porcine eyes.

Authors:  Leo K K Leung; Match W L Ko; David C C Lam
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 6.  A survey and comparative study on the instruments for glaucoma detection.

Authors:  Teik-Cheng Lim; Subhagata Chattopadhyay; U Rajendra Acharya
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  The elasticity and rigidity of the outer coats of the eye.

Authors:  M Asejczyk-Widlicka; B K Pierscionek
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Corneal stiffness affects IOP elevation during rapid volume change in the eye.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Xiaoyin He
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Biomechanical properties of human and porcine corneas.

Authors:  Ahmed Elsheikh; Daad Alhasso; Paolo Rama
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 10.  How might corneal elasticity help us understand diabetes and intraocular pressure?

Authors:  Ronald R Krueger; Jerome C Ramos-Esteban
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  1 in total

1.  Optical coherence elastography for assessing the influence of intraocular pressure on elastic wave dispersion in the cornea.

Authors:  Michael G Sun; Taeyoon Son; Joseph Crutison; Victor Guaiquil; Shujun Lin; Lara Nammari; Dieter Klatt; Xincheng Yao; Mark I Rosenblatt; Thomas J Royston
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2022-01-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.