Literature DB >> 31571091

Predictors affecting myopic regression in - 6.0D to - 10.0D myopia after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with femtosecond laser-assisted or mechanical microkeratome-assisted.

Jihong Zhou1,2,3, Wei Gu4, Shaowei Li4, Lijuan Wu5,6, Yan Gao4, Xiuhua Guo5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the predictive factors of postoperative myopic regression among subjects who have undergone laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap created with a mechanical microkeratome (MM), and LASIK flap created with a femtosecond laser (FS). All recruited patients had a manifest spherical equivalence (SE) from - 6.0D to - 10.0D myopia.
METHODS: This retrospective, observational case series study analyzed outcomes of refraction at 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Predictors affecting myopic regression and other covariates were estimated with the Cox proportional hazards model for the three types of surgeries.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 496 eyes in the LASEK group, 1054 eyes in the FS-LASIK group, and 910 eyes in the MM-LASIK group. At 12 months, from - 6.0D to - 10.0D myopia showed that the survival rates (no myopic regression) were 52.19%, 59.12%, and 58.79% in the MM-LASIK, FS-LASIK, and LASEK groups, respectively. Risk factors for myopic regression included thicker postoperative central corneal thickness (P ≦ 0.01), older age (P ≦ 0.01), aspherical ablation (P = 0.02), and larger transitional zone (TZ) (P = 0.03). Steeper corneal curvature (Kmax) (P = 0.01), thicker preoperative central corneal thickness (P < 0.01), smaller preoperative myopia (P < 0.01), longer duration of myopia (P = 0.02), with contact lens (P < 0.01), and larger optical zone (OZ) (P = 0.02) were protective factors. Among the three groups, the MM-LASIK had the highest risk of postoperative myopic regression (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The MM-LASIK group experienced the highest myopic regression, followed by the FS-LASIK and LASEK groups. Older age, aspheric ablation used, thicker postoperative central corneal thickness, and enlarging TZ contribute to myopic regression; steeper preoperative corneal curvature (Kmax), longer duration of myopia, with contact lens, thicker preoperative central corneal thickness, lower manifest refraction SE, and enlarging OZ prevent postoperative myopic regression in myopia from - 6.0D to - 10.0D.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femtosecond laser; Laser in situ keratomileusis; Laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis; Mechanical microkeratome; Myopic regression

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31571091     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-019-01179-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  41 in total

1.  Structural analysis of the cornea using scanning-slit corneal topography in eyes undergoing excimer laser refractive surgery.

Authors:  Kazutaka Kamiya; Kazunori Miyata; Tadatoshi Tokunaga; Takahiro Kiuchi; Takahiro Hiraoka; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Change in epithelial thickness profile 24 hours and longitudinally for 1 year after myopic LASIK: three-dimensional display with Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  The effect of flap thickness on the visual and refractive outcome of myopic laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  H Eleftheriadis; B Prandi; A Diaz-Rato; M Morcillo; J B Sabater
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Myopic laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment: Incidence and associations.

Authors:  Russell Pokroy; Michael Mimouni; Tzahi Sela; Gur Munzer; Igor Kaiserman
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  The effects of ablation diameter on the outcome of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  D P O'Brart; M C Corbett; C P Lohmann; M G Kerr Muir; J Marshall
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-04

6.  [An analysis of regression after laser in situ keratomileusis for treatment of myopia].

Authors:  Jingcai Lian; Qiong Zhang; Wen Ye; Deyou Zhou; Kangsun Wang
Journal:  Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2002-06

7.  An interval-censored model for predicting myopic regression after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Yun-I Chen; Kuo-Liong Chien; I-Jong Wang; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Li-Sheng Chen; Pi-Jung Lin; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Regression and its mechanisms after laser in situ keratomileusis in moderate and high myopia.

Authors:  A S Chayet; K K Assil; M Montes; M Espinosa-Lagana; A Castellanos; G Tsioulias
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Peripheral refraction in myopia corrected with spectacles versus contact lenses.

Authors:  Simon Backhouse; Stephanie Fox; Basma Ibrahim; John R Phillips
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Epithelial alterations following photorefractive keratectomy for myopia.

Authors:  C A Gauthier; D Epstein; B A Holden; B Tengroth; P Fagerholm; H Hamberg-Nyström; R Sievert
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  2 in total

1.  Recurrent refractive error after myopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis - What could be the reason?

Authors:  Radhika Natarajan; Raj S Paul
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

2.  Is the axial length a risk factor for post-LASIK myopic regression?

Authors:  Amr A Gab-Alla
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.117

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.