OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of the ablation diameter on the outcome of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. DESIGN:Eighty patients were randomized to either a 5.00-mm or a 6.00-mm treatment group and within these groups underwent either a -3.00-diopter (D) or a -6.00-D correction based on their preoperative refraction. A Summit Omnimed excimer laser was used throughout the study. RESULTS: In eyes treated with a 6.00-mm-diameter ablation, the initial hyperopic shift was reduced, with significant differences at 1 week with -3.00-D corrections and at 1 and 4 weeks with -6.00-D corrections (P < .01). At 6 months, the refractive changes were greater and closer to that intended with 6.00-mm-diameter ablations. The predictability of photorefractive keratectomy was significantly improved with 6.00-mm zones, with a reduction in variance of the refractive changes at all stages postoperatively (P < .05 to P < .001). With -3.00-D corrections, objective measurements showed significantly less anterior stromal haze in eyes treated with 6.00-mm zones at 6 months (P < .05). With -6.00-D corrections, haze was significantly reduced at 1, 3, and 6 months in the eyes treated with 6.00-mm zones (P < .05). Five eyes treated with 5.00-mm zones experienced severe regression of the correction, with marked corneal haze and a reduction of 3 or more lines of best corrected Snellen visual acuity at 6 months. No eyes treated with 6.00-mm zones were similarly affected. Computerized measurements of "night" halo were significantly lower in the 6.00-mm treatment groups at 1 week and at 1 and 6 months in the eyes with -3.00-D corrections and at 1 week and at 1 month in the eyes with -6.00-D corrections (P < .05). At 6 months, seven patients treated with 5.00-mm zones complained of severe disturbances of night vision. No eyes in the 6.00-mm group were similarly affected. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with 6.00-mm ablation diameters precipitated less initial overcorrection, greatly improved the predictability of photorefractive keratectomy, and was associated with a reduction in complications impairing postoperative visual performance.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of the ablation diameter on the outcome of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. DESIGN: Eighty patients were randomized to either a 5.00-mm or a 6.00-mm treatment group and within these groups underwent either a -3.00-diopter (D) or a -6.00-D correction based on their preoperative refraction. A Summit Omnimed excimer laser was used throughout the study. RESULTS: In eyes treated with a 6.00-mm-diameter ablation, the initial hyperopic shift was reduced, with significant differences at 1 week with -3.00-D corrections and at 1 and 4 weeks with -6.00-D corrections (P < .01). At 6 months, the refractive changes were greater and closer to that intended with 6.00-mm-diameter ablations. The predictability of photorefractive keratectomy was significantly improved with 6.00-mm zones, with a reduction in variance of the refractive changes at all stages postoperatively (P < .05 to P < .001). With -3.00-D corrections, objective measurements showed significantly less anterior stromal haze in eyes treated with 6.00-mm zones at 6 months (P < .05). With -6.00-D corrections, haze was significantly reduced at 1, 3, and 6 months in the eyes treated with 6.00-mm zones (P < .05). Five eyes treated with 5.00-mm zones experienced severe regression of the correction, with marked corneal haze and a reduction of 3 or more lines of best corrected Snellen visual acuity at 6 months. No eyes treated with 6.00-mm zones were similarly affected. Computerized measurements of "night" halo were significantly lower in the 6.00-mm treatment groups at 1 week and at 1 and 6 months in the eyes with -3.00-D corrections and at 1 week and at 1 month in the eyes with -6.00-D corrections (P < .05). At 6 months, seven patients treated with 5.00-mm zones complained of severe disturbances of night vision. No eyes in the 6.00-mm group were similarly affected. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with 6.00-mm ablation diameters precipitated less initial overcorrection, greatly improved the predictability of photorefractive keratectomy, and was associated with a reduction in complications impairing postoperative visual performance.
Authors: Marcus Ang; Damien Gatinel; Dan Z Reinstein; Erik Mertens; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Jorge L Alió Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2020-07-24 Impact factor: 3.775