Literature DB >> 33128672

Is the axial length a risk factor for post-LASIK myopic regression?

Amr A Gab-Alla1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between the axial length and post-LASIK regression in myopic patients.
METHODS: This is a retrospective case series study conducted at a private eye centre, Ismailia, Egypt. The clinical records of the patients, who experienced LASIK to correct myopia from January 2016 to January 2018, were analysed for myopic regression. The patients were operated on, examined, and followed-up 1 year by one surgeon (AAG).
RESULTS: This study included 1219 patients (2316 eyes) with myopia. Mean ± SD of pre-operative spherical equivalent (SE) was - 4.3 ± 2.1D, range (- 0.50 to - 10.0D). Mean ± SD age of the patients was 26.4 ± 6.8 years, range (21 to 50 years). Male to female ratio was 30.5 to 69.5%. The cumulative incidence rate of myopic regression according to the medical records of the patients was 25.12% (582 eyes out of total 2316 eyes) along the 2 years of this study (12.6% per year). Of the total patients, 14.94% had pre-operative high myopia, 35.84% had pre-operative moderate myopia, and 49.2% had pre-operative low myopia. Of the patients with myopic regression, 52.6% had pre-operative high myopia, 34% had pre-operative moderate myopia, and 13.4% had pre-operative low myopia. The mean ± SD of the axial length of the patients with myopic regression was 26.6 ± 0.44 mm, range (26.0 to 27.86 mm), while the mean ± SD of the axial length of other patients with stable refraction was 24.38 ± 0.73 mm, range (22.9 to 25.9 mm) (t test statistic = 69.3; P value < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative high axial length increases the risk of myopic regression after LASIK.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Axial length; Correlation; LASIK; Myopia; Regression

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33128672      PMCID: PMC7904712          DOI: 10.1007/s00417-020-04990-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  25 in total

1.  Comparison of visual results in initial and re-treatment laser in situ keratomileusis procedures for myopia and astigmatism.

Authors:  N P Patel; T E Clinch; J R Weis; C Ahn; M K Lundergan; K Heidenreich
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Residual bed thickness and corneal forward shift after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Kazunori Miyata; Tadatoshi Tokunaga; Masaaki Nakahara; Shinichiro Ohtani; Ryohei Nejima; Takahiro Kiuchi; Yuichi Kaji; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Cox proportional hazards model of myopic regression for laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with a femtosecond laser and with a mechanical microkeratome.

Authors:  Meng-Yin Lin; David C K Chang; Wen-Ming Hsu; I-Jong Wang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Five-year refractive changes in an adult population: Reykjavik Eye Study.

Authors:  Elinborg Gudmundsdottir; Arsaell Arnarsson; Fridbert Jonasson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Ten-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of up to -10 diopters.

Authors:  Jorge L Alió; Orkun Muftuoglu; Dolores Ortiz; Juan Jose Pérez-Santonja; Alberto Artola; Maria Jose Ayala; Maria Jose Garcia; Gracia Castro de Luna
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Unilateral Refractive Surgery and Myopia Progression.

Authors:  Sara Sella; Nizan Duvdevan-Strier; Igor Kaiserman
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 1.402

7.  Incidence and associations of retreatment after LASIK.

Authors:  Peter S Hersh; Kristen L Fry; Douglas S Bishop
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 8.  High myopia and cataract surgery.

Authors:  Elaine W Chong; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 9.  Post-LASIK Ectasia: Twenty Years of a Conundrum.

Authors:  Renato Ambrósio
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 1.975

10.  Comparison of corneal deformation parameters after SMILE, LASEK, and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.

Authors:  Yang Shen; Zhi Chen; Michael C Knorz; Meiyan Li; Jing Zhao; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  1 in total

1.  Machine learning predicting myopic regression after corneal refractive surgery using preoperative data and fundus photography.

Authors:  Juntae Kim; Ik Hee Ryu; Jin Kuk Kim; In Sik Lee; Hong Kyu Kim; Eoksoo Han; Tae Keun Yoo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.535

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.