Literature DB >> 31570382

Informed Consent in the Genomics Era.

Shannon Rego1, Megan E Grove2, Mildred K Cho3,4, Kelly E Ormond4,5.   

Abstract

Informed consent, the process of gathering autonomous authorization for a medical intervention or medical research participation, is a fundamental component of medical practice. Medical informed consent assumes decision-making capacity, voluntariness, comprehension, and adequate information. The increasing use of genetic testing, particularly genomic sequencing, in clinical and research settings has presented many new challenges for clinicians and researchers when obtaining informed consent. Many of these challenges revolve around the need for patient comprehension of sufficient information. Genomic sequencing is complex-all of the possible results are too numerous to explain, and many of the risks and benefits remain unknown. Thus, historical standards of consent are difficult to apply. Alternative models of consent have been proposed to increase patient understanding, and several have empirically demonstrated effectiveness. However, there is still a striking lack of consensus in the genetics community about what constitutes informed consent in the context of genomic sequencing. Multiple approaches are needed to address this challenge, including consensus building around standards, targeted use of genetic counselors in nongenetics clinics in which genomic testing is ordered, and the development and testing of alternative models for obtaining informed consent.
Copyright © 2020 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31570382      PMCID: PMC7397836          DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a036582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med        ISSN: 2157-1422            Impact factor:   5.159


  72 in total

1.  Patient-centered informed consent in surgical practice.

Authors:  James L Bernat; Lynn M Peterson
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2006-01

2.  Primary care providers' experiences with and perceptions of personalized genomic medicine.

Authors:  June C Carroll; Tutsirai Makuwaza; Donna P Manca; Nicolette Sopcak; Joanne A Permaul; Mary Ann O'Brien; Ruth Heisey; Elizabeth A Eisenhauer; Julie Easley; Monika K Krzyzanowska; Baukje Miedema; Sandhya Pruthi; Carol Sawka; Nancy Schneider; Jonathan Sussman; Robin Urquhart; Catarina Versaevel; Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Supporting Parental Decisions About Genomic Sequencing for Newborn Screening: The NC NEXUS Decision Aid.

Authors:  Megan A Lewis; Ryan S Paquin; Myra I Roche; Robert D Furberg; Christine Rini; Jonathan S Berg; Cynthia M Powell; Donald B Bailey
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Subjects agree to participate in environmental health studies without fully comprehending the associated risk.

Authors:  Robin Lee; Samantha Lampert; Lynn Wilder; Anne L Sowell
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

Authors:  Sarah S Kalia; Kathy Adelman; Sherri J Bale; Wendy K Chung; Christine Eng; James P Evans; Gail E Herman; Sophia B Hufnagel; Teri E Klein; Bruce R Korf; Kent D McKelvey; Kelly E Ormond; C Sue Richards; Christopher N Vlangos; Michael Watson; Christa L Martin; David T Miller
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  A tiered-layered-staged model for informed consent in personal genome testing.

Authors:  Eline M Bunnik; A Cecile J W Janssens; Maartje H N Schermer
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Patient understanding of, satisfaction with, and perceived utility of whole-genome sequencing: findings from the MedSeq Project.

Authors:  J Scott Roberts; Jill O Robinson; Pamela M Diamond; Archana Bharadwaj; Kurt D Christensen; Kaitlyn B Lee; Robert C Green; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Developing a conceptual, reproducible, rubric-based approach to consent and result disclosure for genetic testing by clinicians with minimal genetics background.

Authors:  Kelly E Ormond; Miranda L G Hallquist; Adam H Buchanan; Danielle Dondanville; Mildred K Cho; Maureen Smith; Myra Roche; Kyle B Brothers; Curtis R Coughlin; Laura Hercher; Louanne Hudgins; Seema Jamal; Howard P Levy; Misha Raskin; Melissa Stosic; Wendy Uhlmann; Karen E Wain; Erin Currey; W Andrew Faucett
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Understanding of informed consent by parents of children enrolled in a genetic biobank.

Authors:  Jennifer Klima; Sara M Fitzgerald-Butt; Kelly J Kelleher; Deena J Chisolm; R Dawn Comstock; Amy K Ferketich; Kim L McBride
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Jonathan S Berg; Wayne W Grody; Sarah S Kalia; Bruce R Korf; Christa L Martin; Amy L McGuire; Robert L Nussbaum; Julianne M O'Daniel; Kelly E Ormond; Heidi L Rehm; Michael S Watson; Marc S Williams; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  2 in total

1.  Parents' experiences of decision making for rapid genomic sequencing in intensive care.

Authors:  Fiona Lynch; Amy Nisselle; Zornitza Stark; Clara L Gaff; Belinda McClaren
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Moving from 'fully' to 'appropriately' informed consent in genomics: The PROMICE framework.

Authors:  Julian J Koplin; Christopher Gyngell; Julian Savulescu; Danya F Vears
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.512

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.