Literature DB >> 26729698

Supporting Parental Decisions About Genomic Sequencing for Newborn Screening: The NC NEXUS Decision Aid.

Megan A Lewis1, Ryan S Paquin2, Myra I Roche3, Robert D Furberg4, Christine Rini5, Jonathan S Berg6, Cynthia M Powell3, Donald B Bailey7.   

Abstract

Advances in genomic sequencing technology have raised fundamental challenges to the traditional ways genomic information is communicated. These challenges will become increasingly complex and will affect a much larger population in the future if genomics is incorporated into standard newborn screening practice. Clinicians, public health officials, and other stakeholders will need to agree on the types of information that they should seek and communicate to parents. Currently, few evidence-based and validated tools are available to support parental informed decision-making. These tools will be necessary as genomics is integrated into clinical practice and public health systems. In this article we describe how the North Carolina Newborn Exome Sequencing for Universal Screening study is addressing the need to support parents in making informed decisions about the use of genomic testing in newborn screening. We outline the context for newborn screening and justify the need for parental decision support. We also describe the process of decision aid development and the data sources, processes, and best practices being used in development. By the end of the study, we will have an evidenced-based process and validated tools to support parental informed decision-making about the use of genomic sequencing in newborn screening. Data from the study will help answer important questions about which genomic information ought to be sought and communicated when testing newborns.
Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26729698      PMCID: PMC4922487          DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-3731E

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  34 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of educational materials and destruction/opt-out initiatives for storage and use of residual newborn screening samples.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2010-09-21

2.  Genetic testing in asymptomatic minors: background considerations towards ESHG Recommendations.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Martina C Cornel; Angus Clarke; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  The ethical hazards and programmatic challenges of genomic newborn screening.

Authors:  Aaron J Goldenberg; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Randomized trial examining the effect of two prostate cancer screening educational interventions on patient knowledge, preferences, and behaviors.

Authors:  Melissa R Partin; David Nelson; David Radosevich; Sean Nugent; Ann B Flood; Nancy Dillon; Jeremy Holtzman; Michele Haas; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Recent developments and new applications of tandem mass spectrometry in newborn screening.

Authors:  Piero Rinaldo; Silvia Tortorelli; Dietrich Matern
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.856

6.  Helping patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus make treatment decisions: statin choice randomized trial.

Authors:  Audrey J Weymiller; Victor M Montori; Lesley A Jones; Amiram Gafni; Gordon H Guyatt; Sandra C Bryant; Teresa J H Christianson; Rebecca J Mullan; Steven A Smith
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-28

7.  Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Russell P Harris; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Moving toward NextGenetic counseling.

Authors:  Myra I Roche
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Newborn screening: toward a uniform screening panel and system.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  Incidental Findings with Genomic Testing: Implications for Genetic Counseling Practice.

Authors:  Myra I Roche; Jonathan S Berg
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2015-08-25
View more
  27 in total

1.  Newborn Sequencing in Genomic Medicine and Public Health.

Authors:  Jonathan S Berg; Pankaj B Agrawal; Donald B Bailey; Alan H Beggs; Steven E Brenner; Amy M Brower; Julie A Cakici; Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy; Kee Chan; Flavia Chen; Robert J Currier; Dmitry Dukhovny; Robert C Green; Julie Harris-Wai; Ingrid A Holm; Brenda Iglesias; Galen Joseph; Stephen F Kingsmore; Barbara A Koenig; Pui-Yan Kwok; John Lantos; Steven J Leeder; Megan A Lewis; Amy L McGuire; Laura V Milko; Sean D Mooney; Richard B Parad; Stacey Pereira; Joshua Petrikin; Bradford C Powell; Cynthia M Powell; Jennifer M Puck; Heidi L Rehm; Neil Risch; Myra Roche; Joseph T Shieh; Narayanan Veeraraghavan; Michael S Watson; Laurel Willig; Timothy W Yu; Tiina Urv; Anastasia L Wise
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  A New Era, New Strategies: Education and Communication Strategies to Manage Greater Access to Genomic Information.

Authors:  Megan A Lewis; Natasha Bonhomme; Cinnamon S Bloss
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.683

Review 3.  A Review on Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Awareness, Knowledge, and Attitudes.

Authors:  Rebecca R Moultrie; Julia Kish-Doto; Holly Peay; Megan A Lewis
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  The Genomics ADvISER: development and usability testing of a decision aid for the selection of incidental sequencing results.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Marc Clausen; Chloe Mighton; Lindsay Carlsson; Selina Casalino; Emily Glogowski; Kasmintan Schrader; Michael Evans; Adena Scheer; Nancy Baxter; Jada G Hamilton; Jordan Lerner-Ellis; Kenneth Offit; Mark Robson; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Genetic screening: birthright or earned with age?

Authors:  Lonna Mollison; Jonathan S Berg
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 5.225

6.  Genomic Sequencing for Newborn Screening: Results of the NC NEXUS Project.

Authors:  Tamara S Roman; Stephanie B Crowley; Myra I Roche; Ann Katherine M Foreman; Julianne M O'Daniel; Bryce A Seifert; Kristy Lee; Alicia Brandt; Chelsea Gustafson; Daniela M DeCristo; Natasha T Strande; Lori Ramkissoon; Laura V Milko; Phillips Owen; Sayanty Roy; Mai Xiong; Ryan S Paquin; Rita M Butterfield; Megan A Lewis; Katherine J Souris; Donald B Bailey; Christine Rini; Jessica K Booker; Bradford C Powell; Karen E Weck; Cynthia M Powell; Jonathan S Berg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Values clarification and parental decision making about newborn genomic sequencing.

Authors:  Susana Peinado; Ryan S Paquin; Christine Rini; Myra Roche; Rita M Butterfield; Jonathan S Berg; Cynthia M Powell; Donald B Bailey; Megan A Lewis
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  DECIDE: a Decision Support Tool to Facilitate Parents' Choices Regarding Genome-Wide Sequencing.

Authors:  Patricia Birch; S Adam; N Bansback; R R Coe; J Hicklin; A Lehman; K C Li; J M Friedman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  An Age-Based Framework for Evaluating Genome-Scale Sequencing Results in Newborn Screening.

Authors:  Laura V Milko; Julianne M O'Daniel; Daniela M DeCristo; Stephanie B Crowley; Ann Katherine M Foreman; Kathleen E Wallace; Lonna F Mollison; Natasha T Strande; Zahra S Girnary; Lacey J Boshe; Arthur S Aylsworth; Muge Gucsavas-Calikoglu; Dianne M Frazier; Neeta L Vora; Myra I Roche; Bradford C Powell; Cynthia M Powell; Jonathan S Berg
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 10.  Genetic Counseling and Genome Sequencing in Pediatric Rare Disease.

Authors:  Alison M Elliott
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 6.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.