| Literature DB >> 31566462 |
Michael Fiechter1,2,3, Andrea Roggo1, Ahmed Haider1,2, Susan Bengs1,2, Irene A Burger1, Monika Marędziak1,2, Angela Portmann1, Valerie Treyer1, Anton S Becker4, Michael Messerli1, Urs J Mühlematter4, Ken Kudura1, Elia von Felten1, Dominik C Benz1, Tobias A Fuchs1, Christoph Gräni1, Aju P Pazhenkottil1, Ronny R Buechel1, Philipp A Kaufmann1, Catherine Gebhard1,2.
Abstract
Background Increasing evidence suggests a psychosomatic link between neural systems and the heart. In light of the growing burden of ischemic cardiovascular disease across the globe, a better understanding of heart-brain interactions and their implications for cardiovascular treatment strategies is needed. Thus, we sought to investigate the interaction between myocardial injury and metabolic alterations in central neural areas in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. Methods and Results The association between resting metabolic activity in distinct neural structures and cardiac function was analyzed in 302 patients (aged 66.8±10.2 years; 70.9% men) undergoing fluor-18-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and 99mTc-tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. There was evidence for reduction of callosal, caudate, and brainstem fluor-18-deoxyglucose uptake in patients with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (<55% versus ≥55%: P=0.047, P=0.022, and P=0.013, respectively) and/or in the presence of myocardial ischemia (versus normal perfusion: P=0.010, P=0.013, and P=0.016, respectively). In a sex-stratified analysis, these differences were observed in men, but not in women. A first-order interaction term consisting of sex and impaired left ventricular ejection fraction or myocardial ischemia was identified as predictor of metabolic activity in these neural regions (left ventricular ejection fraction: P=0.015 for brainstem; myocardial ischemia: P=0.004, P=0.018, and P=0.003 for callosal, caudate, or brainstem metabolism, respectively). Conclusions Myocardial dysfunction and injury are associated with reduced resting metabolic activity of central neural structures, including the corpus callosum, the caudate nucleus, and the brainstem. These associations differ in women and men, suggesting sex differences in the pathophysiological interplay of the nervous and cardiovascular systems.Entities:
Keywords: brainstem; caudate nucleus; corpus callosum; fluor‐18‐deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography; myocardial perfusion imaging; nervous system, autonomic; sex
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31566462 PMCID: PMC6806042 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013070
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Heart Assoc ISSN: 2047-9980 Impact factor: 5.501
Figure 1Volumetric analysis of central neural structures (using PMOD software). Illustrative axial positron emission tomography slices depicting region of interests (white arrows) around the corpus callosum (yellow; A), the right and left caudate nucleus (red; B), the brainstem (orange; C), the right and left amygdala (yellow; D)/hippocampus (dark green; D), the right and left thalamus (light green; E), and the right and the left insula (gray; F).
Patient Baseline Characteristics
| Patient Characteristics | Total (n=302) | Men (n=214) | Women (n=88) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean±SD, y | 66.8±10.2 | 66.0±10.2 | 69.0±10 | 0.018 |
| BMI, mean±SD, kg/m2 | 28.1±17.3 | 27.4±14.7 | 29.7±22.8 | 0.769 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 142 (47) | 100 (46.7) | 42 (47.7) | 0.874 |
| Smoking, n (%) | 93 (30.8) | 73 (34.1) | 20 (22.7) | 0.058 |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 56 (18.5) | 42 (19.6) | 14 (15.9) | 0.450 |
| Dyslipidemia, n (%) | 73 (24.2) | 53 (24.8) | 20 (22.7) | 0.707 |
| Family history of CAD, n (%) | 25 (8.3) | 14 (6.5) | 11 (12.5) | 0.088 |
| Known CAD, n (%) | 117 (38.7) | 92 (43) | 25 (28.4) | 0.018 |
| Previous MI, n (%) | 57 (18.9) | 44 (20.6) | 13 (14.8) | 0.243 |
| Previous PCI/CABG, n (%) | 82 (27.2) | 65 (30.4) | 17 (19.3) | 0.050 |
| CACS >75th percentile, n (%) | 95 (31.5) | 65 (30.4) | 30 (34.1) | 0.896 |
| Myocardial ischemia, n (%) | 37 (12.3) | 31 (14.5) | 6 (6.8) | 0.065 |
| Myocardial scar, n (%) | 60 (19.9) | 49 (22.9) | 11 (12.5) | 0.040 |
| Abnormal myocardial perfusion, n (%) | 79 (26.2) | 64 (29.9) | 15 (17) | 0.021 |
| Active cancer, n (%) | 193 (63.9) | 135 (63.1) | 58 (65.9) | 0.642 |
| Depression, n (%) | 19 (6.3) | 14 (6.5) | 5 (5.7) | 0.756 |
| Chronic pain, n (%) | 90 (29.8) | 66 (30.8) | 24 (27.3) | 0.491 |
| β Blocker, n (%) | 146 (48.3) | 112 (52.3) | 34 (38.6) | 0.015 |
| ACE/ARB, n (%) | 156 (51.7) | 112 (52.3) | 44 (50) | 0.547 |
| Statin, n (%) | 126 (41.7) | 88 (41.1) | 38 (43.2) | 0.875 |
| P2Y12 inhibitor, n (%) | 27 (8.9) | 21 (9.8) | 6 (6.8) | 0.372 |
| ASS, n (%) | 128 (42.4) | 98 (45.8) | 30 (34.1) | 0.037 |
| Antidepressant, n (%) | 33 (10.9) | 22 (10.3) | 11 (12.5) | 0.601 |
| Corticosteroid, n (%) | 40 (13.2) | 28 (13.1) | 12 (13.6) | 0.932 |
| Analgesics, n (%) | 135 (44.7) | 95 (44.4) | 40 (45.5) | 0.945 |
| LVEF, mean±SD, % | 58.7±13.2 | 56.3±12.7 | 64.2±12.9 | <0.001 |
| 18F‐FDG bone marrow uptake, mean±SD, SUV | 1.6±0.6 | 1.6±0.5 | 1.7±0.6 | 0.036 |
| Indication for SPECT, n (%) | ||||
| Preoperative evaluation | 186 (61.6) | 126 (58.9) | 60 (68.2) | 0.131 |
| Known CAD | 60 (19.9) | 46 (21.5) | 14 (15.9) | 0.269 |
| Suspected CAD | 56 (18.5) | 42 (19.6) | 14 (15.9) | 0.450 |
| Indication for PET, n (%) | ||||
| Inflammation | 46 (15.2) | 35 (16.4) | 11 (12.5) | 0.397 |
| Cancer | 256 (84.8) | 179 (83.6) | 77 (87.5) | 0.397 |
| Symptoms, n (%) | ||||
| Typical angina pectoris | 30 (9.9) | 24 (11.2) | 6 (6.8) | 0.246 |
| Atypical angina pectoris | 23 (7.6) | 13 (6.1) | 10 (11.4) | 0.115 |
| Dyspnea | 39 (12.9) | 22 (10.3) | 17 (19.3) | 0.033 |
| None | 210 (69.5) | 155 (72.4) | 55 (62.5) | 0.088 |
Data are presented as mean±SD or frequencies (percentages). Two‐sided P values are indicated. ACE/ARB indicates angiotensin‐converting enzyme/angiotensin II receptor blocker; ASS, acetylsalicylic acid; BMI, body mass index; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; CACS, coronary artery calcium score; CAD, coronary artery disease; 18F‐FDG, fluor‐18‐deoxyglucose; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PET, positron emission tomography; SPECT, single‐proton emission computed tomography.
Impact of Neural Structures on Cardiac Function and Perfusion
| Neural Structures | Cardiac Function and Perfusion Parameters | Total Population (n=302), SUV |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present | Absent | |||
| Corpus callosum | LVEF <55% vs ≥55% | 62.8±39.3 | 71.2±32.6 | 0.056 |
| Reversible myocardial perfusion defect | 56.5±35.5 | 70.6±34.2 | 0.020 | |
| Fixed myocardial perfusion defect | 63.5±34.3 | 70.3±34.7 | 0.176 | |
| Abnormal myocardial perfusion | 62.6±35.0 | 71.2±34.3 | 0.058 | |
| Caudate nucleus | LVEF <55% vs ≥55% | 15.3±4.5 | 16.5±3.6 | 0.016 |
| Reversible myocardial perfusion defect | 14.8±4.6 | 16.3±3.7 | 0.023 | |
| Fixed myocardial perfusion defect | 16.0±3.9 | 16.2±3.9 | 0.767 | |
| Abnormal myocardial perfusion | 15.8±4.2 | 16.3±3.7 | 0.305 | |
| Brainstem | LVEF <55% vs ≥55% | 4.6±1.4 | 5.0±1.0 | 0.005 |
| Reversible myocardial perfusion defect | 4.4±1.4 | 4.9±1.1 | 0.025 | |
| Fixed myocardial perfusion defect | 4.8±1.2 | 4.9±1.2 | 0.884 | |
| Abnormal myocardial perfusion | 4.8±1.3 | 4.9±1.1 | 0.398 | |
| Amygdala | LVEF <55% vs ≥55% | 29.3±6.0 | 29.7±5.1 | 0.536 |
| Reversible myocardial perfusion defect | 28.5±6.4 | 29.8±5.2 | 0.182 | |
| Fixed myocardial perfusion defect | 29.6±6.3 | 29.6±5.1 | 0.982 | |
| Abnormal myocardial perfusion | 29.8±6.3 | 29.5±5.0 | 0.751 | |
| Hippocampus | LVEF <55% vs ≥55% | 20.5±3.4 | 20.5±3.2 | 0.857 |
| Reversible myocardial perfusion defect | 19.7±3.7 | 20.6±3.1 | 0.091 | |
| Fixed myocardial perfusion defect | 20.4±3.5 | 20.5±3.1 | 0.874 | |
| Abnormal myocardial perfusion | 20.5±3.5 | 20.5±3.1 | 0.851 | |
| Thalamus | LVEF <55% vs ≥55% | 18.3±6.8 | 20.2±5.8 | 0.014 |
| Reversible myocardial perfusion defect | 18.4±7.8 | 19.9±5.8 | 0.178 | |
| Fixed myocardial perfusion defect | 19.6±5.7 | 19.7±6.2 | 0.968 | |
| Abnormal myocardial perfusion | 19.5±6.8 | 19.7±5.9 | 0.747 | |
| Insula | LVEF <55% vs ≥55% | 6.3±1.0 | 6.4±0.8 | 0.221 |
| Reversible myocardial perfusion defect | 6.1±0.9 | 6.4±0.9 | 0.121 | |
| Fixed myocardial perfusion defect | 6.3±1.0 | 6.4±0.9 | 0.480 | |
| Abnormal myocardial perfusion | 6.3±1.0 | 6.4±0.9 | 0.385 | |
Data are presented as mean±SD. Values available in >200 patients. Two‐sided P values are indicated. LVEF indicates left ventricular ejection fraction; SUV, standardized uptake value.
Figure 2Association of callosal, caudate, and brainstem resting metabolic activity with cardiac function and perfusion in men. A through C, Dichotomous comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥55% vs <55% with fluor‐18‐deoxyglucose (18F‐FDG) resting callosal, caudate, and brainstem uptake (standardized uptake value [SUV]). D through F, Dichotomous comparison of 18F‐FDG resting callosal, caudate, and brainstem uptake in absence or presence of myocardial ischemia. Error bars indicate SE, and P values are depicted.
Figure 3Association of callosal, caudate, and brainstem resting metabolic activity with cardiac function and perfusion in women. A through C, Dichotomous comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥55% vs <55% with fluor‐18‐deoxyglucose (18F‐FDG) resting callosal, caudate, and brainstem uptake (standardized uptake value [SUV]). D through F, Dichotomous comparison of 18F‐FDG resting callosal, caudate, and brainstem uptake in absence or presence of myocardial ischemia. Error bars indicate SE, and P values are depicted.