Literature DB >> 21320906

Prognostic value of cardiac hybrid imaging integrating single-photon emission computed tomography with coronary computed tomography angiography.

Aju P Pazhenkottil1, René N Nkoulou, Jelena-Rima Ghadri, Bernhard A Herzog, Ronny R Buechel, Silke M Küest, Mathias Wolfrum, Michael Fiechter, Lars Husmann, Oliver Gaemperli, Philipp A Kaufmann.   

Abstract

Aims Although cardiac hybrid imaging, fusing single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), provides important complementary diagnostic information for coronary artery disease (CAD) assessment, no prognostic data exist on the predictive value of cardiac hybrid imaging. Hence, the aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of hybrid SPECT/CCTA images. Methods and results Of 335 consecutive patients undergoing a 1-day stress/rest (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin SPECT and a CCTA, acquired on stand-alone scanners and fused to obtain cardiac hybrid images, follow-up was obtained in 324 patients (97%). Survival free of all-cause death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and free of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, MI, unstable angina requiring hospitalization, coronary revascularizations) was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method for the following groups: (i) stenosis by CCTA and matching reversible SPECT defect; (ii) unmatched CCTA and SPECT finding; and (iii) normal finding by CCTA and SPECT. Cox's proportional hazard regression was used to identify independent predictors for cardiac events. At a median follow-up of 2.8 years (25th-75th percentile: 1.9-3.6), 69 MACE occurred in 47 patients, including 20 death/MI. A corresponding matched hybrid image finding was associated with a significantly higher death/MI incidence (P < 0.005) and proved to be an independent predictor for MACE. The annual death/MI rate was 6.0, 2.8, and 1.3% for patients with matched, unmatched, and normal findings. Conclusion Cardiac hybrid imaging allows risk stratification in patients with known or suspected CAD. A matched defect on hybrid image is a strong predictor of MACE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21320906     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  32 in total

1.  Downstream resource utilization following hybrid cardiac imaging with an integrated cadmium-zinc-telluride/64-slice CT device.

Authors:  Michael Fiechter; Jelena R Ghadri; Mathias Wolfrum; Silke M Kuest; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Rene N Nkoulou; Bernhard A Herzog; Cathérine Gebhard; Tobias A Fuchs; Oliver Gaemperli; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Multimodality imaging in interventional cardiology.

Authors:  Bas L van der Hoeven; Martin J Schalij; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Fadi G Hage; Daniel S Berman; Rory Hachamovitch; Ami Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Sequential SPECT/CT imaging for detection of coronary artery disease in a large cohort: evaluation of the need for additional imaging and radiation exposure.

Authors:  Elsemiek M Engbers; Jorik R Timmer; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Mohamed Mouden; Ad H J Oostdijk; Siert Knollema; Pieter L Jager
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Emergence of Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Woman's Problem and Need for Change in Definition on Angiography.

Authors:  Carl J Pepine; Keith C Ferdinand; Leslee J Shaw; Kelly Ann Light-McGroary; Rashmee U Shah; Martha Gulati; Claire Duvernoy; Mary Norine Walsh; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  New horizon of fusion imaging using echocardiography: its progress in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Yoichi Takaya; Hiroshi Ito
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2019-11-25

Review 7.  Cardiac hybrid imaging.

Authors:  Oliver Gaemperli; Philipp A Kaufmann; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Hybrid anatomo-functional imaging of coronary artery disease: Beneficial irrespective of its core components.

Authors:  Francesco Nudi; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Andrea Romagnoli; Orazio Schillaci; Alessandro Nudi; Francesco Versaci
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  CT myocardial perfusion imaging: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Richard A P Takx; Csilla Celeng; U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Hybrid quantitative imaging: Will it enter clinical practice?

Authors:  Piotr Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.