Literature DB >> 31558404

Cross-calibration, Least Significant Change and Quality Assurance in Multiple Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Scanner Environments: 2019 ISCD Official Position.

Lawrence G Jankowski1, Sarah Warner2, Ken Gaither3, Leon Lenchik4, Bo Fan5, Ying Lu6, John Shepherd7.   

Abstract

In preparation for the International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference (PDC) 2019 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, a cross-calibration and precision task force was assembled and tasked to review the literature, summarize the findings, and generate positions to answer 4 related questions provided by the PDC Steering Committee, which expand upon the current ISCD official positions on these subjects. (1) How should a provider with multiple dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners of the same make and model calculate least significant change (LSC)? (2) How should a provider with multiple DXA systems with the same manufacturer but different models calculate LSC? (3) How should a provider with multiple DXA systems from different manufacturers and models calculate LSC? (4) Are there specific phantom procedures that one can use to provide trustworthy in vitro cross calibration for same models, different models, and different makes? Based on task force deliberations and the resulting systematic literature reviews, 3 new positions were developed to address these more complex scenarios not addressed by current official positions on single scanner cross calibration and LSC. These new positions provide appropriate guidance to large multiple DXA scanner providers wishing to offer patients flexibility and convenience, and clearly define good clinical practice requirements to that end.
Copyright © 2019 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; cross calibration; least significant change; official positions; precision

Year:  2019        PMID: 31558404     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2019.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of novel DXA system, Shimazu SONIALVISION G4, with GE-Lunar PRODIGY.

Authors:  Toki Takemoto; Takeshi Oguchi; Koji Oda
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometry in pediatrics: a practical review and update.

Authors:  Hedieh Khalatbari; Larry A Binkovitz; Marguerite T Parisi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2020-08-28

3.  Intermachine differences in DXA measurements vary by skeletal site, and impact the assessment of low bone density in children.

Authors:  Babette S Zemel; Halley Wasserman; Andrea Kelly; Bo Fan; John Shepherd; Joan Lappe; Vicente Gilsanz; Sharon Oberfield; Karen K Winer; Heidi J Kalkwarf
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  The Effect of Region of Interest on Measurement of Bone Mineral Density of the Proximal Femur: Simulation Analysis Using CT Images.

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Masaki Takao; Yoshito Otake; Makoto Iwasa; Hidetoshi Hamada; Wataru Ando; Yoshinobu Sato; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanner mismatch in follow-up bone mineral density testing.

Authors:  K Lee; K Al Jumaily; M Lin; K Siminoski; C Ye
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 5.071

6.  New Frontiers of Body Composition in Sport.

Authors:  Henry Lukaski; Christiana J Raymond-Pope
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Prescreening for osteoporosis with forearm bone densitometry in health examination population.

Authors:  Chun Yue; Na Ding; Lu-Lu Xu; Ya-Qian Fu; Yuan-Wei Guo; Yan-Yi Yang; Xian-Mei Zhao; Zhi-Feng Sheng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Compartment-specific effects of muscle strength on bone microarchitecture in women at high risk of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Alexander Simon; Hannah S Schäfer; Felix N Schmidt; Julian Stürznickel; Michael Amling; Tim Rolvien
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 12.063

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.