| Literature DB >> 31554225 |
Roland Bamou1,2, Nadège Sonhafouo-Chiana3,4, Konstantinos Mavridis5, Timoléon Tchuinkam6, Charles S Wondji7,8, John Vontas9,10, Christophe Antonio-Nkondjio11,12.
Abstract
A key factor affecting malaria vector control efforts in Cameroon is the rapid expansion of insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l (An. gambiae) populations; however, mechanisms involved in insecticide resistance in forest mosquito populations are still not well documented yet. The present study was conducted to screen molecular mechanisms conferring insecticide resistance in An. gambiae s.l. populations from the South Cameroon forest region. WHO bioassays were conducted with F0 An. gambiae females aged three to four days from forest (Sangmelima, Nyabessan, and Mbandjock) and urban sites (Yaoundé (Bastos and Nkolondom)), against pyrethroids (permethrin 0.75% and deltamethrin 0.05%) and carbamates (bendiocarb 0.1%). Members of the An. Gambiae s.l. species complex were identified using molecular diagnostic tools. TaqMan assays were used to screen for target site mutations. The expression profiles of eight genes implicated in insecticide resistance were assessed using RT-qPCR. Cuticle hydrocarbon lipids were measured to assess their potential implication in insecticide resistance. Both An. Gambiae and An. coluzzii were detected. An. gambiae was highly prevalent in Sangmelima, Nyabessan, Mbandjock, and Nkolondom. An. coluzzii was the only species found in the Yaoundé city center (Bastos). Low mortality rate to both pyrethroids and bendiocarb was recorded in all sites. High frequency of L1014F allele (75.32-95.82%) and low frequencies of L1014S (1.71-23.05%) and N1575Y (5.28-12.87%) were recorded. The G119S mutation (14.22-35.5%) was detected for the first time in An. gambiae populations from Cameroon. This mutation was rather absent from An. coluzzii populations. The detoxification genes Cyp6m2, Cyp9k1, Cyp6p4, Cyp6z1, as well as Cyp4g16 which catalyzes epicuticular hydrocarbon biosynthesis, were found to be overexpressed in at least one population. The total cuticular hydrocarvbon content, a proxy of cuticular resistance, did not show a pattern associated with pyrethroid resistance in these populations. The rapid emergence of multiple resistance mechanisms in An. Gambiae s.l. population from the South Cameroon forest region is of big concern and could deeply affect the sustainability of insecticide-based interventions strategies in this region.Entities:
Keywords: G119S mutation; South Cameroon forest region; anopheles; insecticide resistance; malaria
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31554225 PMCID: PMC6827028 DOI: 10.3390/genes10100741
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.141
Mortality rate of field collected and laboratory strains Anophelesgambiae s.l. exposed to pyrethroid (deltamethrin 0.05% and permethrin 0.75%) and carbamate (bendiocarb 0.01%) insecticides.
| Pyrethroid | Carbamate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site Characteristics | Populations | N | Deltamethrin | Permethrin | Bendiocarb |
|
| Kisumu lab strain | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Ngoussolab strain | 100 | 100 | 98 | 100 | |
|
| Bastos | 100 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 86.00 |
|
| Nkolondom | 100 | 8.00 | 66.00 | |
|
| Nyabessan | 100 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 74.00 |
| Sangmelima | 100 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 82.00 | |
| Mbandjock | 100 | 11.2 | 6.0 | 66.00 |
Distribution of An. Gambiae s.l. species in the different study sites.
| Populations/Strains | Species | % |
|---|---|---|
| Kisumu laboratory strain |
| 100% |
| Ngousso laboratory strain |
| 100% |
| Bastos (Yaoundé) |
| 100% |
| Nkolondom (Yaoundé) |
| 100% |
| Sangmelima |
| 59.98% |
|
| 40.02% | |
| Mbandjock |
| 65.36% |
|
| 34.66% | |
| Nyabessan |
| 90.56% |
|
| 9.44% |
Incidence of resistance alleles in different populations of An. Gambiae s.l. mosquitoes.
| Populations | Sample Size (Alleles) | Resistant Mutation Allelic Frequencies (Mean ± SE) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pyrethroids | Carbamates/Organophosphates | ||||
| % kdr L1014F | % kdr L1014S | % kdr N1575Y | % iAChe G119S | ||
| Kisumu lab strain | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ngusso lab strain | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bastos | 80 | 81.33 ± 5.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nyabessan | 80 | 75.32 ± 1.6 | 23.05 ± 2.07 | 5.28 ± 3.1 | 14.22 ± 8.85 |
| Sangmelima | 80 | 90.06 ± 4.62 | 1.38 ± 1.38 | 0 | 20.25 ± 7.06 |
| Nkolodom | 80 | 95.82 ± 1.53 | 0 | 9.46 ± 3.2 | 21.78 ± 12.8 |
| Mbandjock | 80 | 89.06 ± 4.05 | 1.71 ± 1.71 | 12.87 ± 3.2 | 35.5 ± 4.3 |
Gene expression analysis in the five resistant mosquito populations compared to the susceptible strains. Bold letters indicate statistically significant upregulation, asterisks (*) indicate consistent upregulation compared to both susceptible strains.
| Population | Fold Changes (95% CI) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Bastos | vs KIS | 4.21 | 4.39 * | 7.30 * | 3.74 * | 3.36 * | 2.46 | 0.85 | 1.71 |
| (2.63–6.96) | (2.93–6.10) | (4.03–19.5) | (2.56–5.09) | (2.36–4.93) | (1.99–3.12) | (0.71–0.97) | (1.20–3.76) | ||
| vsNG | 1.18 | 2.70 * | 2.68 * | 2.95 * | 2.42 * | 0.71 | 0.45 | 1.18 | |
| (0.80–1.78) | (1.73–3.75) | (1.76–5.71) | (1.93–4.17) | (1.64–3.42) | (0.56–0.87) | (0.36–0.56) | (0.92–1.55) | ||
| Nyabessan | vs KIS | 0.94 | 1.07 | 2.55 | 0.49 | 2.01 | 0.74 | 0.90 | 2.04 |
| (0.34–1.97) | (0.31–2.33) | (1.15–8.50) | (0.31–0.69) | (1.28–3.33) | (0.47–1.21) | (0.75–1.15) | (1.07–5.33) | ||
| vsNG | 0.27 | 0.66 | 0.94 | 0.39 | 1.45 | 0.21 | 0.48 | 1.41 | |
| (0.10–0.51) | (0.20–1.44) | (0.49–2.49) | (0.24–0.57) | (0.89–2.31) | (0.13–0.34) | (0.38–0.64) | (0.86–2.27) | ||
| Sangmelima | vs KIS | 0.63 | 1.64 | 4.15 * | 1.26 | 1.79 | 1.37 | 1.24 | 3.11 * |
| (0.24–1.24) | (0.85–4.40) | (2.22–10.7) | (0.61–3.03) | (1.14–2.92) | (1.07–1.80) | (1.01–1.42) | (2.31–6.49) | ||
| vsNG | 0.18 | 1.01 | 1.52 * | 0.99 | 1.29 | 0.40 | 0.66 | 2.15 * | |
| (0.07–0.32) | (0.50–2.71) | (1.03–2.26) | (0.46–2.48) | (0.80–2.03) | (0.30–0.50) | (0.51–0.82) | (1.76–2.66) | ||
| Nkolodom | vs KIS | 1.71 | 5.27 * | 8.74 * | 3.17 * | 2.79 | 1.56 | 0.835 | 2.65 * |
| (0.81–3.68) | (1.72–14.9) | (3.07–28.4) | (1.18–5.93) | (0.99–6.01) | (1.34–2.06) | (0.71–1.10) | (1.70–6.83) | ||
| vs NG | 0.48 | 3.24 * | 3.21 * | 2.50 * | 2.01 | 0.451 | 0.411 | 1.83 * | |
| (0.25–0.96) | (1.08–9.18) | (1.29–8.33) | (1.09–5.76) | (0.735–4.17) | (0.38–0.60) | (0.36–0.62) | (1.30–2.61) | ||
| Mbandjock | vs KIS | 1.51 | 3.31 * | 6.26 * | 1.89 | 2.13 * | 0.98 | 1.01 | 1.85 |
| (0.73–2.75) | (2.07–4.59) | (3.25–16.1) | (1.11–2.78) | (1.39–3.30) | (0.69–1.26) | (0.77–1.16) | (1.301–4.08) | ||
| vs NG | 0.42 | 2.04 * | 2.30 * | 1.49 | 1.53 * | 0.29 | 0.53 | 1.28 | |
| (0.22–0.71) | (1.22–2.92) | (1.37–4.71) | (0.84–2.32) | (1.01–2.32) | (0.19–0.35) | (0.39–0.67) | (0.99–1.67) | ||
KIS: Kisumu susceptible laboratory strain; NG: Ngousso susceptible laboratory strain. Statistical significance was assessed according to the Pfaffl method [37].