| Literature DB >> 30509288 |
Albert Sourou Salako1,2, Idelphonse Ahogni3,4, Rock Aïkpon3,5, Aboubakar Sidick3, Fortune Dagnon6, Arthur Sovi7, André Aimé Sominahouin3,8, Fiacre Agossa3, Laurent Iyikirenga9, Martin C Akogbeto3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aims to provide baseline data on the resistance status to insecticides, the frequency of mechanisms involved and the impact of the association with the synergist piperonyl butoxide (PBO) on resistant Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) populations in two regions of northern Benin, prior to an indoor residual spraying campaign and introduction of next generation long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) incorporating PBO.Entities:
Keywords: Anopheles gambiae (s.l.); Benin; IRS; Resistance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30509288 PMCID: PMC6278060 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-018-3180-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Study area showing the six surveyed districts
Fig. 2Mortalities observed 24 hours after mosquito exposure to pirimiphos-methyl (a) and bendiocarb (b)
Fig. 3Mortality rates of An. gambiae (s.l.) with permethrin alone and permethrin + PBO (a), deltamethrin alone and deltamethrin + PBO (b) in the surveyed districts, 24 hours after exposure
Distribution of An. coluzzii and An. gambiae in the KGS and DCO health zones
| Heath zone | District | Total no. tested |
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | ||||||
| KGS | Kandi | 266 | 180 | 67.67 | 86 | 32.33 | 65.03 | 1 | <0.001 |
| Gogounou | 175 | 91 | 52 | 84 | 48 | 0.4114 | 1 | 0.5212 | |
| Segbana | 72 | 45 | 62.5 | 27 | 37.5 | 8.027 | 1 | 0.004 | |
| Total (KGS) | 513 | 316 | 61.60 | 197 | 38.40 | 54.28 | 1 | <0.001 | |
| DCO | Djougou | 269 | 101 | 37.55 | 168 | 62.45 | 32.38 | 1 | <0.001 |
| Copargo | 270 | 51 | 18.89 | 219 | 81.11 | 206.59 | 1 | <0.001 | |
| Ouake | 111 | 50 | 45.05 | 61 | 54.95 | 1.801 | 1 | 0.179 | |
| Total (DCO) | 650 | 202 | 31.08 | 448 | 68.92 | 184.69 | 1 | <0.001 | |
| Grand total | 1163 | 518 | 44.54 | 645 | 55.46 | 27.302 | 1 | <0.001 | |
a% An. coluzzii vs % An. gambiae
Number of An. coluzzii and An. gambiae in dead and live mosquitoes from the KGS and DCO health zones
| Health Zone | District | Total no. tested | Bendiocarb | Permethrin | Deltamethrin | Pirimiphos-methyl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| Dead ( | Live ( | Dead ( | Live ( | Dead ( | Live ( | Dead ( | Live ( | Dead ( | Live ( | Dead ( | Live ( | Dead ( | Live ( | Dead ( | Live ( | |||
| KGS | Kandi | 266 | 53 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 8 | 58 | 1 | 32 | 34 | 27 | 7 | 31 | nt | nt | nt | nt |
| Gogounou | 175 | 28 | 2 | 24 | 4 | 16 | 15 | 16 | 12 | 24 | 6 | 20 | 8 | nt | nt | nt | nt | |
| Segbana | 72 | 15 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 9 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 6 | nt | nt | nt | nt | |
| Total (KGS) | 513 | 96 | 2 | 41 | 11 | 29 | 82 | 18 | 53 | 73 | 34 | 29 | 45 | nt | nt | nt | nt | |
| Proportion (%) | 97.9 | 2.1 | 78.9 | 21.1 | 26.1 | 73.9 | 25.4 | 74.6 | 68.2 | 31.8 | 39.2 | 60.8 | nt | nt | nt | nt | ||
| DCO | Djougou | 269 | 35 | 0 | 53 | 5 | 4 | 28 | 2 | 54 | 13 | 21 | 8 | 46 | nt | nt | nt | nt |
| Copargo | 270 | 18 | 1 | 74 | 4 | 14 | 4 | 33 | 31 | 13 | 1 | 59 | 18 | nt | nt | nt | nt | |
| Ouake | 111 | 41 | 2 | 47 | 5 | nt | nt | nt | nt | nt | nt | nt | nt | 7 | 0 | 9 | 0 | |
| Total (DCO) | 650 | 94 | 3 | 174 | 14 | 18 | 32 | 35 | 85 | 26 | 22 | 67 | 64 | 7 | 0 | 9 | 0 | |
| Proportion (%) | 96.9 | 3.1 | 92.6 | 7.4 | 36.0 | 64.0 | 29.2 | 70.8 | 54.2 | 45-8 | 51.0 | 49.0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | ||
Abbreviation: nt, no mosquitoes tested by PCR to identify species
Frequencies of the kdr L1014F mutation observed in An. gambiae and An. coluzzii
| District | Species | No. tested | Genotype | Freq. 1014F |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1014F/F | 1014L/F | 1014L/L | |||||||
| Kandi |
| 86 | 57 | 19 | 10 | 0.773 | 7.043 | 1 | 0.0079 |
|
| 180 | 86 | 64 | 30 | 0.656 | ||||
| Gogounou |
| 84 | 66 | 15 | 3 | 0.875 | 5.924 | 1 | 0.0149 |
|
| 91 | 57 | 26 | 8 | 0.769 | ||||
| Segbana |
| 27 | 15 | 9 | 3 | 0.722 | 0.260 | 1 | 0.609 |
|
| 45 | 22 | 16 | 7 | 0.667 | ||||
| Djougou |
| 168 | 114 | 41 | 13 | 0.801 | 2.534 | 1 | 0.111 |
|
| 101 | 63 | 23 | 15 | 0.738 | ||||
| Copargo |
| 219 | 158 | 52 | 9 | 0.840 | 0.440 | 1 | 0.506 |
|
| 51 | 39 | 11 | 1 | 0.873 | ||||
| Ouake |
| 61 | 44 | 11 | 6 | 0.811 | 3.770 | 1 | 0.0521 |
|
| 50 | 27 | 15 | 8 | 0.690 | ||||
| Total |
| 645 | 454 | 147 | 44 | 0.818 | 32.599 | 1 | <0.0001 |
|
| 518 | 294 | 155 | 69 | 0.717 | ||||
Abbreviation: Freq., frequency
Frequencies of the Ace1 G119S mutation observed in An. gambiae and An. coluzzii
| District | Species | No. tested | Genotype | Freq. 119S |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 119S/S | 119G/S | 119G/G | |||||||
| Kandi |
| 86 | 0 | 4 | 82 | 0.0233 | 0.179 | 1 | 0.671 |
|
| 180 | 0 | 5 | 175 | 0.0139 | ||||
| Gogounou |
| 84 | 0 | 6 | 78 | 0.0357 | 1.412 | 1 | 0.234 |
|
| 91 | 0 | 2 | 89 | 0.011 | ||||
| Segbana |
| 27 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 0.0556 | 2.746 | 1 | 0.0974 |
|
| 45 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 0 | ||||
| Djougou |
| 168 | 0 | 10 | 158 | 0.0298 | 0.178 | 1 | 0.672 |
|
| 101 | 0 | 4 | 97 | 0.0198 | ||||
| Copargo |
| 219 | 0 | 10 | 209 | 0.0228 | 1.282 | 1 | 0.257 |
|
| 51 | 0 | 0 | 51 | 0 | ||||
| Ouake |
| 61 | 0 | 2 | 59 | 0.0164 | <0.0001 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 50 | 0 | 1 | 49 | 0.01 | ||||
| Total |
| 645 | 0 | 35 | 610 | 0.0271 | 6.252 | 1 | 0.0124 |
|
| 518 | 0 | 12 | 506 | 0.0116 | ||||
Abbreviation: Freq., frequency
Fig. 4Mono-oxygenase (a) and glutathione-S-transferase (b) activities in field populations of Anopheles gambiae (s.l.). *Population with a significantly higher enzyme activity as compared to the Kisumu reference susceptible strain. The red horizontal lines indicates the mean level of enzymatic activity. Abbreviations: MFO, Mixed function oxidases; GST, glutathione S-transferase
Fig. 5α-esterase and β-esterase activities in field populations of Anopheles gambiae (s.l.). *Population with a significantly higher enzyme activity as compared to the Kisumu reference susceptible strain. The red horizontal lines indicates the mean level of enzymatic activity