| Literature DB >> 25879950 |
Christophe Antonio-Nkondjio1,2, Billy Tene Fossog3,4, Edmond Kopya5,6, Yacouba Poumachu7,8, Benjamin Menze Djantio9,10, Cyrille Ndo11,12,13, Timoléon Tchuinkam14, Parfait Awono-Ambene15, Charles S Wondji16.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The adaptation of malaria vectors to urban areas is becoming a serious challenge for malaria control. The study presents the evolution of pyrethroid resistance in mosquito populations from the cities of Douala and Yaoundé between 2010 and 2013.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25879950 PMCID: PMC4403825 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-015-0675-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Figure 1A map showing the evolution of Anopheles gambiae susceptibility to permethrin and deltamethrin between 2003 and 2012 in different parts of Cameroon.
Figure 2Evolution of Anopheles gambiae s.l. susceptibility to permethrin and deltamethrin from 2010 to 2013 in the cities of Douala and Yaoundé.
Comparison of the level susceptibility of mosquitoes to permethrin and deltamethrin between 2010 and 2013 in Yaoundé and Douala
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| |||||
|
|
| |||||
| Permethrin | Douala | Unpolluted | 80.3% (73–88.2) | 32.5% (28–37.5) | 8.47 | <0.00001 |
| Yaoundé | Unpolluted | 75.6% (66.7-85.3) | 36.8% (48.8-61.1) | 5.31 | <0.00001 | |
| Yaoundé | Cultivated | 56.7% (43.2-73.2) | 22.3% (14.2-33.5) | 4.56 | <0.00001 | |
| Deltamethrin | Douala | Unpolluted | 94.4% (87.5-100) | 60% (54.1-66.4) | 11.35 | <0.00001 |
| Yaoundé | Unpolluted | 93.1% (82.8-100) | 61.9% (55.1-69.4) | 8.26 | <0.00001 | |
| yaoundé | Cultivated | 85% (71.6-100) | 59.7% (48.2-73.3) | 3.83 | <0.00001 |
Figure 3Evolution of the kdr allele frequency (F(kdr)) in Anopheles gambiae s.l. populations between 2010 and 2013 in Douala and Yaoundé.
Variability of the intron-1 of the gene in and collected in 2011 in Douala and Yaoundé
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| T | C | C | - | MS1 | 16 | 53.3% | 8 | 44.4% | 4 | 18.2% | 16 | 100% |
| T | C | A | - | M14 | - | - | 2 | 11.1% | 2 | 9.09% | - | - |
| C | C | C | - | MS3 | 6 | 20% | 6 | 33.3% | 12 | 54.5% | - | - |
| C | C | C | 169C | M15 | 4 | 13.3% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| C | C | C | 394G | M16 | 4 | 13.3% | 2 | 11.1% | 4 | 18.2% | - | - |
| Kdr alleles- Intron-1 haplotypes | ||||||||||||
| MS1-L1014L | 6 | 40% | 3 | 33.3% | - | - | 1 | 12.5% | ||||
| MS1-L1014F | 2 | 13.3% | 1 | 11.1% | 2 | 18.2% | 6 | 75% | ||||
| MS1-L1014S | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 12.5% | ||||
| MS3-L1014L | 3 | 20% | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 54.5% | - | - | ||||
| M14-L1014L | - | - | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 9.1% | - | - | ||||
| M15-L1014L | 1 | 6.67% | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||
| M15-L1014F | 1 | 6.67% | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||
| M16-L1014L | 2 | 13.3% | 1 | 11.1% | 2 | 18.2% | - | - | ||||
| Estimates of genetic variability | ||||||||||||
| h | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | ||||||||
| Hd ± SD | 0.82 ± 0.034 | 0.76 ± 0.05 | 0.59 ± 0.085 | 0.43 ± 0.14 | ||||||||
| k | 1.42 | 1.098 | 1.048 | 0.633 | ||||||||
| n | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||
| D | 1.045 | 0.718 | 0.706 | 0.13 | ||||||||
| Fs | −0.614 | 0.089 | 1.43 | 0.062 | ||||||||
h: number of different haplotypes; Hd ± SD, haplotype diversity (±standard deviation); K: average number of pairwise nucleotide differences; n: number of mutations; D: Tajima’s test; Fs: Fu’s Fs statistic.