Literature DB >> 22932478

Multiple-insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes, Southern Côte d'Ivoire.

Constant V A Edi1, Benjamin G Koudou, Christopher M Jones, David Weetman, Hilary Ranson.   

Abstract

Malaria control depends on mosquito susceptibility to insecticides. We tested Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes from Côte d'Ivoire for resistance and screened a subset for target site mutations. Mosquitoes were resistant to insecticides of all approved classes. Such complete resistance, which includes exceptionally strong phenotypes, presents a major threat to malaria control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22932478      PMCID: PMC3437712          DOI: 10.3201/eid1809.120262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Targeting the mosquito vector is the most effective way to prevent malaria transmission; worldwide, this method accounts for more than half of malaria control expenditures (,). During the past decade, increased use of insecticide-treated bed nets and indoor residual spraying have made a pivotal contribution toward decreasing the number of malaria cases (). However, these gains are threatened by the rapid development and spread of insecticide resistance among major malaria vectors in Africa (). To keep vector resistance from undermining control programs, insecticide-resistance management strategies must reduce the current overreliance on pyrethroids. These compounds are used widely for indoor residual spraying and uniquely for insecticide-treated bed nets. However, having a limited number of insecticides available for malaria vector control restricts options for effective insecticide resistance management. Only 4 classes of insecticide, which share 2 modes of action, are approved by the World Health Organization (WHO). A mutation at a single target site can result in mosquito resistance to DDT and pyrethroids or to organophosphates and carbamates. Furthermore, mosquitoes can express multiple insecticide-resistance mechanisms (). For example, in several populations of the major malaria vector in Africa, Anopheles gambiae s.l. mosquitoes, mutations in the DDT/pyrethroid target site, known as knockdown resistance (kdr) alleles, have been found in conjunction with resistance alleles of the acetylcholinesterase gene (Ace-1), the target site of organophosphates and carbamates (). To date, however, these cases of multiple-insecticide resistance have been restricted by the relatively low prevalence of organophosphate/carbamate resistance and the limited effect that kdr mutations alone have on pyrethroid-based interventions (). We report a population of An. gambiae mosquitoes from a rice-growing area of southern Côte d’Ivoire that have high frequencies of kdr and Ace-1 alleles and unprecedentedly high levels of phenotypic resistance to all insecticide classes available for malaria control.

The Study

During May–September 2011, mosquito larvae were collected in irrigated rice fields surrounding Tiassalé, southern Côte d’Ivoire (5°52′47′′N; 4°49′48′′W) and reared to adults in insectaries on a diet of MikroMin (Tetra, Melle, Germany) fish food. A total of 1,571 adult female An. gambiae s.l. mosquitoes, 3–5 days of age, were exposed to 1 of 5 insecticides (0.1% bendiocarb, 1.0% fenitrothion, 0.75% permethrin, 0.05% deltamethrin, 4% DDT) or a control papers for 1 hour, according to standard WHO procedures (). Mosquito deaths were recorded 24 hours later. DNA was extracted from individual mosquitoes according to the LIVAK method (), and a subsample of 500 mosquitoes were all found to be the M molecular form of An. gambiae s.s. by using the SINE-PCR method (). The target site mutation G119S in the Ace-1 gene (Ace-1) and L1014F and L1014S kdr mutations were screened by using restriction fragment length polymorphism () or TaqMan assays (), respectively. According to WHO criteria, An. gambiae mosquitoes from Tiassalé are resistant to all insecticide classes, and resistance is extremely prevalent; more than two thirds of mosquitoes survived the diagnostic dose for 4 of the 5 insecticides tested (Table 1). To assess the level of resistance, we exposed the Tiassalé population and a susceptible laboratory population of An. gambiae (Kisumu) mosquitoes to the pyrethroid deltamethrin or the carbamate bendiocarb for a range of exposure times and assessed deaths 24 hours later (Technical Appendix). We found an unexpectedly strong resistance phenotype to the 2 insecticides (Figure 1, Figure 2). For deltamethrin, 4 hours of exposure were required to kill 50% (median lethal time, [LT50]); in comparison, the LT50 for the susceptible Kisumu strain was <2 minutes (resistance ratio = 138) (Technical Appendix). Similarly, the LT50 for bendiocarb was nearly 5 hours for the Tiassalé strain yet <12 minutes for the susceptible strain (resistance ratio = 24) (Technical Appendix).
Table 1

Prevalence of insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes, M form, from Tiassalé, Côte d’Ivoire, 2011

InsecticideNo. tested*No. dead% Dead (95% CI)
Permethrin2886924.0 (19.1–29.3)
Deltamethrin2829031.9 (26.5–37.7)
DDT306258.2 (5.4–11.8)
Fenitrothion29621974.0 (68.6–78.9)
Bendiocarb2993712.4 (8.9–16.6)

*Measured by death within 24 h, after 1h exposure to each insecticide. All mosquitoes were resistant according to World Health Organization classification (<80% dead) ().

Figure 1

Time-mortality curve for wild-caught Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes from Tiassalé, southern Côte d’Ivoire, exposed to deltamethrin (median time to death = 248 minutes). Logistic regression line was fitted to time-response data by using SigmaPlot version 11.0 (www.sigmaplot.com). R2 = 0.96. Error bars indicate SEM.

Figure 2

Time-mortality curve for wild-caught Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes from Tiassalé, southern Côte d’Ivoire, exposed to bendiocarb (median time to death = 286 minutes). Logistic regression line was fitted to time-response data by using SigmaPlot version 11.0 (www.sigmaplot.com). R2 = 0.88. Error bars indicate SEM.

*Measured by death within 24 h, after 1h exposure to each insecticide. All mosquitoes were resistant according to World Health Organization classification (<80% dead) (). Time-mortality curve for wild-caught Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes from Tiassalé, southern Côte d’Ivoire, exposed to deltamethrin (median time to death = 248 minutes). Logistic regression line was fitted to time-response data by using SigmaPlot version 11.0 (www.sigmaplot.com). R2 = 0.96. Error bars indicate SEM. Time-mortality curve for wild-caught Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes from Tiassalé, southern Côte d’Ivoire, exposed to bendiocarb (median time to death = 286 minutes). Logistic regression line was fitted to time-response data by using SigmaPlot version 11.0 (www.sigmaplot.com). R2 = 0.88. Error bars indicate SEM. To investigate the causes of this resistance, we screened a subset of mosquitoes for the target site mutations, kdr 1014F and 1014S. Only the 1014F kdr mutation was detected, and this resistance allele was found at high frequency (83%). There was a significant association between presence of the 1014F kdr allele and ability to survive exposure to DDT but not to either pyrethroid (Table 2). In contrast, the Ace-1 allele was strongly associated with survival after exposure to bendiocarb and fenitrothion (Table 2).
Table 2

Association between genotype and mosquito survival after insecticide exposure*

InsecticideNo. testedStatusNo.No. per genotype
Frequency†
Odds ratio§p value
LLLFFF1014F‡
DDT73Alive48273988.540.02
Dead252101372
Permethrin88Alive441123184.11.230.82
Dead443122979.5
Deltamethrin89Alive451123284.40.820.86
Dead44293385.2
GGGSSS119S¶
Bendiocarb86Alive490490501000.40 × 10–12
Dead372512016.2
Fenitrothion100Alive500500501,1760
Dead5048202

*F and L represent mutant resistant alleles (phenylalanine) and wild-type alleles (leucine), respectively; S and G represent mutant resistant alleles (serine) and wild-type alleles (glycine), respectively. No resistant homozygotes GG were found among the 186 mosquitoes genotyped for Ace-1 by restriction fragment length polymorphism (a subset of 48 was further screened by using the TaqMan assay; congruence between the 2 methods was 100%).
†The frequencies were calculated for each insecticide and mosquito status (alive/dead) after exposure.
‡1014F represent the kdr frequencies.
§Genotypic odds ratios (ORs) are shown because these exceed allelic ORs for DDT (recessive model), bendiocarb, and fenitrothion (both overdominant models), and are similar for permethrin and deltamethrin. For bendiocarb and fenitrothion absence of GG genotypes in the “Alive” group means that ORs are infinity, therefore ORs are shown if one GG was present. F and L represent mutant resistant alleles (phenylalanine) and wild-type alleles (leucine), respectively; S and G represent mutant resistant alleles (serine) and wild-type alleles.
¶119S represents the Ace-1 frequencies.

*F and L represent mutant resistant alleles (phenylalanine) and wild-type alleles (leucine), respectively; S and G represent mutant resistant alleles (serine) and wild-type alleles (glycine), respectively. No resistant homozygotes GG were found among the 186 mosquitoes genotyped for Ace-1 by restriction fragment length polymorphism (a subset of 48 was further screened by using the TaqMan assay; congruence between the 2 methods was 100%).
†The frequencies were calculated for each insecticide and mosquito status (alive/dead) after exposure.
‡1014F represent the kdr frequencies.
§Genotypic odds ratios (ORs) are shown because these exceed allelic ORs for DDT (recessive model), bendiocarb, and fenitrothion (both overdominant models), and are similar for permethrin and deltamethrin. For bendiocarb and fenitrothion absence of GG genotypes in the “Alive” group means that ORs are infinity, therefore ORs are shown if one GG was present. F and L represent mutant resistant alleles (phenylalanine) and wild-type alleles (leucine), respectively; S and G represent mutant resistant alleles (serine) and wild-type alleles.
¶119S represents the Ace-1 frequencies.

Conclusions

Pyrethroid resistance in An. gambiae mosquitoes was first reported from Côte d’Ivoire in 1993 (); carbamate resistance was detected in the 1990s (). Nevertheless, ≈2 decades later, it is surprising and worrying to find complete resistance to all insecticides tested, particularly—for deltamethrin and bendiocarb—at such high levels. Resistance mechanisms seem to be varied. Ace-1 is strongly associated with organophosphate and carbamate resistance, and the absence of 119S homozygotes might be attributable to the high fitness cost of the Ace-1 allele in the absence of insecticide (). Presence of the 1014F kdr allele alone does not confer the ability to survive diagnostic doses of pyrethroids; thus, alternative mechanisms must be responsible for the high-level pyrethroid resistance in this population. The selective pressures responsible for this intense multiple-insecticide resistance in Tiassalé mosquitoes are unclear. There is a high coverage of insecticide-treated bed nets, but this coverage does not differ from that in other parts of the continent, and indoor residual spraying has not been conducted in this region. Use of insecticides in agriculture has been linked to resistance in malaria vectors. This use is perhaps the most likely explanation in this district of intense commercial production of rice, cocoa, and coffee. Whatever the cause, the implications of this resistance scenario for malaria control are severe. With no new classes of insecticides for malaria control anticipated until 2020 at the earliest (), program managers have few options available when confronted with multiple-insecticide resistance. Assessing the effect of pyrethroid resistance on the efficacy of insecticide-treated bed nets is complex because of the poorly understood associations between net integrity, insecticide content, net usage, and net efficacy. Nevertheless, resistance levels, such as those reported here, combined with continual selection pressure will inevitably lead to suboptimal mosquito control by use of insecticide-treated bed nets and indoor residual spraying. If unchecked, this resistance could spread rapidly and threaten the fragile gains that have been made in reducing malaria across Africa.

Technical Appendix

Time-mortality curve for Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes, Kisumu strain, exposed to deltamethrin and bendiocarb, and time-death data for adult female A. gambiae s.s. mosquitoes, Tiassalé strain, and standard susceptible colony Kisumu 24 hours after exposure to bendiocarb or deltamethrin.
  12 in total

1.  Efficacy of mosquito nets treated with insecticide mixtures or mosaics against insecticide resistant Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Côte d'Ivoire.

Authors:  J M Hougard; V Corbel; R N'Guessan; F Darriet; F Chandre; M Akogbéto; T Baldet; P Guillet; P Carnevale; M Traoré-Lamizana
Journal:  Bull Entomol Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.750

2.  Global malaria mortality between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis.

Authors:  Christopher J L Murray; Lisa C Rosenfeld; Stephen S Lim; Kathryn G Andrews; Kyle J Foreman; Diana Haring; Nancy Fullman; Mohsen Naghavi; Rafael Lozano; Alan D Lopez
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Resistance to carbosulfan in Anopheles gambiae from Ivory Coast, based on reduced sensitivity of acetylcholinesterase.

Authors:  R N'Guessan; F Darriet; P Guillet; P Carnevale; M Traore-Lamizana; V Corbel; A A Koffi; F Chandre
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.739

4.  Resistance of Anopheles gambiae s.s. to pyrethroids in Côte d'Ivoire.

Authors:  N Elissa; J Mouchet; F Riviere; J Y Meunier; K Yao
Journal:  Ann Soc Belg Med Trop       Date:  1993-12

5.  Organization and mapping of a sequence on the Drosophila melanogaster X and Y chromosomes that is transcribed during spermatogenesis.

Authors:  K J Livak
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The unique mutation in ace-1 giving high insecticide resistance is easily detectable in mosquito vectors.

Authors:  M Weill; C Malcolm; F Chandre; K Mogensen; A Berthomieu; M Marquine; M Raymond
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.585

7.  Multiple insecticide resistance: an impediment to insecticide-based malaria vector control program.

Authors:  Delenasaw Yewhalaw; Fantahun Wassie; Walter Steurbaut; Pieter Spanoghe; Wim Van Bortel; Leen Denis; Dejene A Tessema; Yehenew Getachew; Marc Coosemans; Luc Duchateau; Niko Speybroeck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Insertion polymorphisms of SINE200 retrotransposons within speciation islands of Anopheles gambiae molecular forms.

Authors:  Federica Santolamazza; Emiliano Mancini; Frédéric Simard; Yumin Qi; Zhijian Tu; Alessandra della Torre
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 2.979

9.  Multiple insecticide resistance mechanisms involving metabolic changes and insensitive target sites selected in anopheline vectors of malaria in Sri Lanka.

Authors:  M Devika B Perera; Janet Hemingway; Shp Parakrama Karunaratne
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 2.979

10.  Detection of knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations in Anopheles gambiae: a comparison of two new high-throughput assays with existing methods.

Authors:  Chris Bass; Dimitra Nikou; Martin J Donnelly; Martin S Williamson; Hilary Ranson; Amanda Ball; John Vontas; Linda M Field
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.979

View more
  108 in total

Review 1.  Current and Future Prospects for Preventing Malaria Transmission via the Use of Insecticides.

Authors:  Hilary Ranson
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 2.  Identification, Validation, and Application of Molecular Diagnostics for Insecticide Resistance in Malaria Vectors.

Authors:  Martin J Donnelly; Alison T Isaacs; David Weetman
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2015-12-29

3.  Delayed mortality effects cut the malaria transmission potential of insecticide-resistant mosquitoes.

Authors:  Mafalda Viana; Angela Hughes; Jason Matthiopoulos; Hilary Ranson; Heather M Ferguson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Advances in genetics and genomics: use and limitations in achieving malaria elimination goals.

Authors:  Sharmini Gunawardena; Nadira D Karunaweera
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Copy number variation (CNV) and insecticide resistance in mosquitoes: evolving knowledge or an evolving problem?

Authors:  David Weetman; Luc S Djogbenou; Eric Lucas
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 5.186

6.  Averting a malaria disaster: will insecticide resistance derail malaria control?

Authors:  Janet Hemingway; Hilary Ranson; Alan Magill; Jan Kolaczinski; Christen Fornadel; John Gimnig; Maureen Coetzee; Frederic Simard; Dabiré K Roch; Clément Kerah Hinzoumbe; John Pickett; David Schellenberg; Peter Gething; Mark Hoppé; Nicholas Hamon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Identification and characterization of ace2-type acetylcholinesterase in insecticide-resistant and -susceptible parasitoid wasp Oomyzus sokolowskii (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae).

Authors:  Hua Mei Zhuang; Chang Wei Li; Gang Wu
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.316

8.  Repurposing isoxazoline veterinary drugs for control of vector-borne human diseases.

Authors:  Marie Miglianico; Maarten Eldering; Hannah Slater; Neil Ferguson; Pauline Ambrose; Rosemary S Lees; Karin M J Koolen; Katerina Pruzinova; Magdalena Jancarova; Petr Volf; Constantianus J M Koenraadt; Hans-Peter Duerr; Graham Trevitt; Baiyuan Yang; Arnab K Chatterjee; John Wisler; Angelika Sturm; Teun Bousema; Robert W Sauerwein; Peter G Schultz; Matthew S Tremblay; Koen J Dechering
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Cytochrome P450 associated with insecticide resistance catalyzes cuticular hydrocarbon production in Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Vasileia Balabanidou; Anastasia Kampouraki; Marina MacLean; Gary J Blomquist; Claus Tittiger; M Patricia Juárez; Sergio J Mijailovsky; George Chalepakis; Amalia Anthousi; Amy Lynd; Sanou Antoine; Janet Hemingway; Hilary Ranson; Gareth J Lycett; John Vontas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  CRISPR/Cas9 modified An. gambiae carrying kdr mutation L1014F functionally validate its contribution in insecticide resistance and combined effect with metabolic enzymes.

Authors:  Linda Grigoraki; Ruth Cowlishaw; Tony Nolan; Martin Donnelly; Gareth Lycett; Hilary Ranson
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.