| Literature DB >> 31547311 |
Xueliang Wang1,2, Xindi Shan3,4, Yunlou Dun5,6, Chao Cai7,8, Jiejie Hao9,10, Guoyun Li11,12, Kaiyun Cui13,14, Guangli Yu15,16.
Abstract
Recent studies have reported that dietary fiber improvedEntities:
Keywords: AMPK signaling pathway; ROS; fucoidan; insulin resistance; lipid metabolism; metabolic syndrome
Year: 2019 PMID: 31547311 PMCID: PMC6767115 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24183319
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Effects of fucoidan from Fucus vesiculosus (FvF) on relieving insulin resistance (IR) in HepG2 cells. Effects of sodium palmitate (PA) on cellular glucose consumption (a). Cells were treated with a concentration range of PA for 24 h. Effects of FvF on glucose consumption in IR cells (b). Cells were treated with Metf (2 mM) or FvF (100 μg/mL) in the presence of 100 μM PA for 24 h. (c). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) was detected by in situ dihydroethidium (DHE) staining (200×). C, control group; M, cells were treated with 100 μM PA for 24 h; Metf and FvF, cells were treated with metformin (2 mM) or FvF (100 μg/mL) in the presence of 100 μM PA for 24 h. Phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (pJNK) (d) and phosphorylation of protein kinase B (pAkt) (e) protein levels changed between different treatment groups. C, control group; M, cells treated with 100 μM PA for 24 h; Metf and FvF, cells treated with 100 μM PA for 24 h then incubated with metformin (2 mM) or FvF (100 μg/mL) for another 6 h. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Differences were assessed by ANOVAs and statistical results are denoted as follows: * p < 0.05 versus the control group; # p < 0.05 versus the model group.
Figure 2The effects of fucoidan from Fucus vesiculosus (FvF) on the adenosine 5′-monophosphate-ativated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling pathway. The effects of FvF on the regulation of pAMPK (a), phosphorylation of HMG-CoA reductase (pHMGCR) (b), phosphorylation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase (pACC) (c), and sterol-regulatory element-binding protein-1c (SREBP-1C) (d). C, control group; M, cells treated with 100 μM PA for 24 h; Metf and FvF, cells treated with 100 μM sodium palmitate (PA) for 24 h then incubated with metformin (2 mM) or FvF (100 μg/mL) for another 6 h. SREBP-1C ratio was calculated by 125 kDa immature form divided by 68 kDa mature form. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Differences were assessed by ANOVAs and statistical results are denoted as follows: * p < 0.05 versus the control group; # p < 0.05 versus the model group.
Figure 3Effects of fucoidan from Fucus vesiculosus (FvF) on lipid metabolism in HepG2 cell. Triglyceride (TG) (a) and total cholesterol (TC) (b) contents. (c). Oil Red O staining of HepG2 cells (100×). C, control group; M, cells treated with 100 μM PA for 24 h; Metf and FvF, cells treated with 100 μM PA in the presence of metformin (2 mM) or FvF (100 μg/mL) for 24 h. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Differences were assessed by ANOVAs and statistical results are denoted as follows: * p < 0.05 versus the control group; # p < 0.05 versus the model group.
Figure 4Effects of fucoidan from Fucus vesiculosus (FvF) on total energy intake, body weight gain, and adiposity index in high-fat diet (HFD) and streptozotocin (STZ)-induced metabolic syndrome (MetS) mice. (a) Total energy intake; Body weight (b) and weight gain (c) during 9 weeks feeding trail; (d) Adiposity index, calculated according to the formula: 100 × (perirenal fat pad + epididymal fat pad)/body weight. C, mice were fed a normal diet; M, mice were fed a HFD; Metf, mice were fed a HFD with 225 mg/kg/day metformin; FvF-L, mice were fed a HFD with 20 mg/kg/day FvF; FvF-H, mice were fed a HFD with 100 mg/kg/day FvF. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Differences were assessed by ANOVAs and statistical results are denoted as follows: * p < 0.05 versus the control group; # p < 0.05 versus the model group.
Figure 5Effects of fucoidan from Fucus vesiculosus (FvF) on the serum and liver lipid profile in high-fat diet (HFD) and streptozotocin (STZ)-induced metabolic syndrome (MetS) mice. (a) Serum triacylglycerol (TG); (b) Serum total cholesterol (TC); (c) Serum low density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C); (d) Serum high density lipoprotein-C (HDL-C); (e) lipid accumulation in liver tissue characterized by Oil Red O staining (100×). C, mice were fed a normal diet; M, mice were fed a HFD; Metf, mice were fed a HFD with 225 mg/kg/day metformin; FvF-L, mice were fed a HFD with 20 mg/kg/day FvF; FvF-H, mice were fed a HFD with 100 mg/kg/day FvF. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Differences were assessed by ANOVAs and statistical results are denoted as follows: * p < 0.05 versus the control group; # p < 0.05 versus the model group.
Figure 6Effects of fucoidan from Fucus vesiculosus (FvF) on the blood glucose related physiological indexes in high-fat diet (HFD) and streptozotocin (STZ)-induced MetS mice. (a) Fasting blood glucose; (b) Random blood glucose; (c) Glycated hemoglobin (GHb) content; (d) Homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), calculated by fasting blood glucose (mmol L−1) * fasting insulin (mU/L)/22.5; (e) Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was conducted at the ninth week. C, mice were fed a normal diet; M, mice were fed a HFD; Metf, mice were fed a HFD with 225 mg/kg/day metformin; FvF-L, mice were fed a HFD with 20 mg/kg/day FvF; FvF-H, mice were fed a HFD with 100 mg/kg/day FvF. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Differences were assessed by ANOVAs and statistical results are denoted as follows: * p < 0.05 versus the control group; # p < 0.05 versus the model group.
Figure 7Effects of fucoidan from Fucus vesiculosus (FvF) on on glucose transport. FvF on the 2-(N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)amino)-2-deoxyglucose (2-NBDG) transport in Caco-2 monolayer model (a) and glucose transport in everted gut sac model (b). Caco-2 monolayer model and everted gut sac model were treated with 0, 20, 50, or 100 μg/mL of FvF. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was conducted with eight-week-old male kunming mice (c). Mice were perfused with 20 or 100 mg/kg of FvF 30 min before oral glucose administion (2 g/kg body weight). Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Differences were assessed by ANOVAs and statistical results are denoted as follows: * p < 0.05 versus the control group.