Literature DB >> 31544430

[The measurement and clinical significance of the rotation angles of head-neck fragments after cephalomedullary nail fixation in intertrochanteric fractures].

Shouchao Du1, Wenfeng Xiong1, Shimin Zhang2, Sunjun Hu1, Lizhi Zhang1, Shiyi Chen1, Zhen Wei1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure the rotation angle of the head-neck fragment of intertrochanteric fracture after cephalomedullary nail fixation by three-dimensional CT imaging, and to explore its clinical significance.
METHODS: The clinical data of 68 patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture of AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO-OTA) type 31-A2 treated with cephalomedullary nail fixation and with complete intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative three-dimensional CT imaging data between July 2016 and October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, there were 21 males and 47 females, aged 68-93 years, with an average age of 81.8 years. There were 31 cases of AO/OTA type 31-A2.2 and 37 cases of 31-A2.3. Fracture reduction quality was evaluated according to Baumgaertner et al. and Chang et al. criteria. The anteromedial cortical contact or not of each patient was observed by three-dimensional CT imaging on T3DView software after operation. The rotation of head-neck fragments were divided into three types: non-rotation, flexion rotation, and hyperextension rotation. The rotation angles of each type were measured and the relationship between the rotation type of the head-neck fragments and the contact of the anteromedial cortex was analyzed.
RESULTS: The reduction and fixation of the small trochanter were not performed in 68 patients. According to Baumgaertner et al. criteria, the quality of fracture reduction was excellent in 15 cases (22.1%), acceptable in 50 cases (73.5%), and poor in 3 cases (4.4%). According to Chang et al. criteria, 31 cases were excellent (45.6%), 33 cases were acceptable (48.5%), and 4 cases were poor (5.9%). Thirty-nine cases (57.4%) received anteromedial cortical support and 29 cases (42.6%) did not receive cortical support. Three-dimensional CT imaging showed non-rotation in 12 cases (17.6%), flexion rotation in 39 cases (57.4%), and hyperextension rotation in 17 cases (25.0%). There were 7 cases (58.3%), 30 cases (76.9%), and 2 cases (11.8%) of cortical support in non-rotation group, flexion rotation group, and hyperextension rotation group, respectively. The rotation angles were (1.05±0.61), (13.96±6.17), (8.21±3.88)°, respectively. There were significant differences between groups ( P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: In the unstable intertrochanteric fracture after cephalomedullary nail fixation, the rotation of head-neck fragment exists in most patients, and the types of flexion rotation and non-rotation can easily obtain cortical support reduction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intertrochanteric fracture; anteromedial cortex; cortical support reduction; fracture reduction; head-neck fragment rotation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31544430      PMCID: PMC8337633          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201905003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  17 in total

1.  Redisplacement after reduction with intramedullary nails in surgery of intertrochanteric fracture: cause analysis and preventive measures.

Authors:  Zhiyang Xu; Mei Zhang; Jian Yin; Longxi Ren; Yanjun Zeng
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  The role of lesser trochanter fragment in unstable pertrochanteric A2 proximal femur fractures - is refixation of the lesser trochanter worth the effort?

Authors:  Christian Ehrnthaller; Alain Christoph Olivier; Florian Gebhard; Lutz Dürselen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Complications relating to accuracy of reduction of intertrochanteric fractures treated with a compressive hip screw.

Authors:  Francisco Guerra Pinto; Pedro Dantas; Rodrigo Moreira; Rosa Mamede; Luís Branco Amaral
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2010 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Mechanics of the treatment of hip injuries.

Authors:  H Kaufer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  CT evaluation of torsional malalignment after intertrochanteric fracture fixation.

Authors:  M Ramanoudjame; P Guillon; C Dauzac; C Meunier; J M Carcopino
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 2.256

6.  Predictors of failure for cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femoral fractures.

Authors:  A Kashigar; A Vincent; M J Gunton; D Backstein; O Safir; P R T Kuzyk
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AO-ASIF proximal femoral nail.

Authors:  F Fogagnolo; M Kfuri; C A J Paccola
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Torsional malalignment, how much significant in the trochanteric fractures?

Authors:  Tae Young Kim; Yong Beom Lee; Jun Dong Chang; Sang Soo Lee; Jae Hyun Yoo; Kook Jin Chung; Ji Hyo Hwang
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support: a key element in stability reconstruction for the unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures.

Authors:  Shi-Min Chang; Ying-Qi Zhang; Zhuo Ma; Qing Li; Jens Dargel; Peer Eysel
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  The Effect of Positive Medial Cortical Support in Reduction of Pertrochanteric Fractures with Posteromedial Wall Defect Using a Dynamic Hip Screw.

Authors:  Myung Rae Cho; Jae Hyuk Lee; Jai Bum Kwon; Jung Suk Do; Seung Bum Chae; Won-Kee Choi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-08-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.