Literature DB >> 7371269

Mechanics of the treatment of hip injuries.

H Kaufer.   

Abstract

When treated operatively, mechanical problems associated with intertrochanteric hip fracture include malunion and nonunion. Their frequency and severity are directly related to the mechanical effectiveness of internal fixation, which is determined by 5 independent variables: bone quality, fragment geometry, reduction, implant, and implant placement. While all 5 variables are of importance, bone quality and fragment geometry are the product of the patient and the trauma and cannot be significantly modified by the treating surgeon. Reduction, implant placement, and implant selection are the variables which the surgeon can manipulate. While all 3 are important, implant selection and implant placement are of relatively greater importance than reduction. Implant placement in the biomechanically ideal position for the individual patient is probably the single most important of the 5 variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7371269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  35 in total

1.  Treatment of subtrochanteric fractures. A comparison of the Gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw: short-term outcome in 58 patients.

Authors:  I Saarenpää; T Heikkinen; P Jalovaara
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The treatment of transtrochanteric fractures of the femur with a minimally invasive technique using an extramedullary implant MINUS System.

Authors:  Rogério Naim Sawaia; William Dias Belangero
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Cephalomedullary fixation for intertrochanteric fractures: an operative technical tip.

Authors:  Lin Jin; Liping Zhang; Zhiyong Hou; Wei Chen; Pengcheng Wang; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-03-22

4.  Intrapelvic migration of hip lag screw of proximal femoral nail-sequele to a paradoxical reverse Z effect and their critical analysis.

Authors:  Hitesh Lal; Deepak Kumar Sharma; Deepak Mittal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-06-16

5.  A comparison of two fixation methods for femoral trochanteric fractures: a new generation intramedullary system vs sliding hip screw.

Authors:  Christian Carulli; Federico Piacentini; Tommaso Paoli; Roberto Civinini; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2017-05-30

6.  Anteromedial cortical support reduction in unstable pertrochanteric fractures: a comparison of intra-operative fluoroscopy and post-operative three dimensional computerised tomography reconstruction.

Authors:  Shi-Min Chang; Ying-Qi Zhang; Shou-Chao Du; Zhuo Ma; Sun-Jun Hu; Xi-Zhou Yao; Wen-Feng Xiong
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-10       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Biomechanics important to interpret radiographs of the hip.

Authors:  D I Rosenthal; J A Scott
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes among Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty, Compression Hip Screw and Proximal Femur Nail Antirotation in Treating Comminuted Intertrochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  You-Sung Suh; Jae-Hwi Nho; Seong-Min Kim; Sijohn Hong; Hyung-Suk Choi; Jong-Seok Park
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2015-03-31

9.  Subtrochanteric fractures. Classification and results of Ender nailing.

Authors:  B S Zain Elabdien; S Olerud; G Karlström
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1984

10.  Intramedullary nailing in pertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur.

Authors:  S J Ponce; M P Laird; J P Waddell
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.