Literature DB >> 25086117

Predictors of failure for cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femoral fractures.

A Kashigar1, A Vincent2, M J Gunton2, D Backstein2, O Safir2, P R T Kuzyk2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify factors that predict implant cut-out after cephalomedullary nailing of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric hip fractures, and to test the significance of calcar referenced tip-apex distance (CalTAD) as a predictor for cut-out. We retrospectively reviewed 170 consecutive fractures that had undergone cephalomedullary nailing. Of these, 77 met the inclusion criteria of a non-pathological fracture with a minimum of 80 days radiological follow-up (mean 408 days; 81 days to 4.9 years). The overall cut-out rate was 13% (10/77). The significant parameters in the univariate analysis were tip-apex distance (TAD) (p < 0.001), CalTAD (p = 0.001), cervical angle difference (p = 0.004), and lag screw placement in the anteroposterior (AP) view (Parker's ratio index) (p = 0.003). Non-significant parameters were age (p = 0.325), gender (p = 1.000), fracture side (p = 0.507), fracture type (AO classification) (p = 0.381), Singh Osteoporosis Index (p = 0.575), lag screw placement in the lateral view (p = 0.123), and reduction quality (modified Baumgaertner's method) (p = 0.575). In the multivariate analysis, CalTAD was the only significant measurement (p = 0.001). CalTAD had almost perfect inter-observer reliability (interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.901). Our data provide the first reported clinical evidence that CalTAD is a predictor of cut-out. The finding of CalTAD as the only significant parameter in the multivariate analysis, along with the univariate significance of Parker's ratio index in the AP view, suggest that inferior placement of the lag screw is preferable to reduce the rate of cut-out. ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cut-out; Femoral fractures; Nail; Tip-apex

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25086117     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B8.33644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  36 in total

1.  Arthroplasty for unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures may offer a lower re-operation rate as compared to cephalomedullary nailing.

Authors:  Simcha G Fichman; Tatu J Mäkinen; Oleg Safir; Alex Vincent; Benjamin Lozano; Aidin Kashigar; Paul R T Kuzyk
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Is rotation the mode of failure in pertrochanteric fractures fixed with nails? Theoretical approach and illustrative cases.

Authors:  C Kokoroghiannis; D Vasilakos; K Zisis; G Dimitriou; E Pappa; D Evangelopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-20

3.  Predictors of failure following fixation of intertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation.

Authors:  Raghavan Raghuraman; Jia Wen Kam; David Thai Chong Chua
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.858

4.  Can TAD and CalTAD predict cut-out after extra-medullary fixation with new generation devices of proximal femoral fractures? A retrospective study.

Authors:  Gaetano Caruso; Mattia Andreotti; Carlotta Pari; Francesco Soldati; Alessandro Gildone; Vincenzo Lorusso; Leo Massari
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-09-29

5.  Cemented hip hemiarthroplasty clinical observations on unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderlies.

Authors:  Q Cui; Y S Liu; D F Li; P Zhang; J Guo; C Liu; W H Jiang; B Zhang; S B Liu; Y J Zeng
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Tip-apex distance and other predictors of outcome in cephalomedullary nailing of unstable trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Bobby John; Anirudh Sharma; Anupam Mahajan; Ritesh Pandey
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-04-29

Review 7.  Cement augmentation for trochanteric fracture in elderly: A systematic review.

Authors:  Leonardo Stramazzo; Salvatore Ratano; Francesco Monachino; Davide Pavan; Giuseppe Rovere; Lawrence Camarda
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-10-20

Review 8.  Strategies for managing the destruction of calcar femorale.

Authors:  Jin Mei; Lili Pang; Zhongchao Jiang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  [The measurement and clinical significance of the rotation angles of head-neck fragments after cephalomedullary nail fixation in intertrochanteric fractures].

Authors:  Shouchao Du; Wenfeng Xiong; Shimin Zhang; Sunjun Hu; Lizhi Zhang; Shiyi Chen; Zhen Wei
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-10-15

10.  Prognostic Factors of 1-Year Postoperative Functional Outcomes of Older Patients with Intertrochanteric Fractures in Thailand: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Nath Adulkasem; Phichayut Phinyo; Jiraporn Khorana; Dumnoensun Pruksakorn; Theerachai Apivatthakakul
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.