Literature DB >> 31540969

Community level socioeconomic status association with surgical outcomes and resource utilisation in a regional cohort: a prospective registry analysis.

J Hunter Mehaffey1, Robert B Hawkins2, Eric J Charles2, Florence E Turrentine2, Brian Kaplan3, Sandy Fogel4, Charles Harris4, David Reines5, Jorge Posadas6, Gorav Ailawadi2, John B Hanks2, Peter T Hallowell2, R Scott Jones2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic status affects surgical outcomes, however these factors are not included in clinical quality improvement data and risk models. We performed a prospective registry analysis to determine if the Distressed Communities Index (DCI), a composite socioeconomic ranking by zip code, could predict risk-adjusted surgical outcomes and resource utilisation.
METHODS: All patients undergoing surgery (n=44,451) in a regional quality improvement database (American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program ACS-NSQIP) were paired with DCI, ranging from 0-100 (low to high distress) and accounting for unemployment, education level, poverty rate, median income, business growth and housing vacancies. The top quartile of distress was compared to the remainder of the cohort and a mixed effects modeling evaluated ACS-NSQIP risk-adjusted association between DCI and the primary outcomes of surgical complications and resource utilisation.
RESULTS: A total of 9369 (21.1%) patients came from severely distressed communities (DCI >75), who had higher rates of most medical comorbidities as well as transfer status (8.4% vs 4.8%, p<0.0001) resulting in higher ACS-NSQIP predicted risk of any complication (8.0% vs 7.1%, p<0.0001). Patients from severely distressed communities had increased 30-day mortality (1.8% vs 1.4%, p=0.01), postoperative complications (9.8% vs 8.5%, p<0.0001), hospital readmission (7.7 vs 6.8, p<0.0001) and resource utilisation. DCI was independently associated with postoperative complications (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.10, p<0.0001) as well as resource utilisation after adjusting for ACS-NSQIP predicted risk
CONCLUSION: Increasing Distressed Communities Index is associated with increased postoperative complications and resource utilisation even after ACS-NSQIP risk adjustment. These findings demonstrate a disparity in surgical outcomes based on community level socioeconomic factors, highlighting the continued need for public health innovation and policy initiatives. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health policy; healthcare quality improvement; patient safety; quality improvement; surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31540969     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  10 in total

1.  Emergency to Elective Surgery Ratio as a Disparities Sensitive Surgical Access Metric, A Study of Low Socioeconomic Status in Australia.

Authors:  Elzerie de Jager; Ronny Gunnarsson; Yik-Hong Ho
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Area Deprivation Index is Associated with Variation in Quality of Life and Psychosocial Well-being Following Breast Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Abbas M Hassan; Huan T Nguyen; Joseph P Corkum; Jun Liu; Sahil K Kapur; Carrie K Chu; Nina Tamirisa; Anaeze C Offodile
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 4.339

3.  Factors Associated With Disparities in Hospital Readmission Rates Among US Adults Dually Eligible for Medicare and Medicaid.

Authors:  David Silvestri; Demetri Goutos; Anouk Lloren; Sheng Zhou; Guohai Zhou; Thalia Farietta; Sana Charania; Jeph Herrin; Alon Peltz; Zhenqiu Lin; Susannah Bernheim
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2022-01-28

4.  Association of Socioeconomic Area Deprivation Index with Hospital Readmissions After Colon and Rectal Surgery.

Authors:  Federico M Ghirimoldi; Susanne Schmidt; Richard C Simon; Chen-Pin Wang; Zhu Wang; Bradley B Brimhall; Paul Damien; Eric E Moffett; Laura S Manuel; Zaheer U Sarwar; Paula K Shireman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Specialty-Specific Readmission Risk Models Outperform General Models in Estimating Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Readmission Risk.

Authors:  Florence E Turrentine; Timothy L McMurry; Mark E Smolkin; R Scott Jones; Victor M Zaydfudim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Can social vulnerability indices predict county trauma fatality rates?

Authors:  Heather M Phelos; Andrew-Paul Deeb; Joshua B Brown
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.697

7.  Mapping disadvantage: identifying inequities in functional outcomes for prostate cancer survivors based on geography.

Authors:  Kendrick Koo; Nathan Papa; Melanie Evans; Michael Jefford; Maarten IJzerman; Victoria White; Sue M Evans; Eli Ristevski; Jon Emery; Jeremy Millar
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Disparities in surgical outcomes for low socioeconomic status patients in Australia.

Authors:  Elzerie de Jager; Ronny Gunnarsson; Yik-Hong Ho
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.025

9.  Community distress as a predictor of early hernia recurrence for older adults undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR).

Authors:  Savannah M Renshaw; Molly A Olson; Benjamin K Poulose; Courtney E Collins
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.453

10.  Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal and gastric cancer under the Chinese multi-site practice policy: admittance standards of competence are needed.

Authors:  Zhenghao Cai; Haiqin Song; Zhenfeng Huang; Abraham Fingerhut; Ximo Xu; Hao Zhong; Zhigang Li; Yingjie Zhang; Dachong Sha; Dandan Bao; Haibo Wang; Binghua Cai; Shangbo Hua; Yanhui Zhang; Jianguang Sun; Ke Ye; Jianwen Li; Yong Lu; Bo Feng
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2022-09-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.