Elzerie de Jager1, Ronny Gunnarsson2,3,4, Yik-Hong Ho5,6. 1. College of Medicine and Dentistry, The James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia. elzerie.dejager@my.jcu.edu.au. 2. General Practice/Family Medicine, Institute of Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, PO BOX 453, 405 30, Goteborg, Sweden. 3. Research, Education, Development and Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Västra Götaland, Sweden. 4. Primary Health Care Clinic for Homeless People, Närhälsan, Region Västra Götaland, Västra Götaland, Sweden. 5. College of Medicine and Dentistry, The James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia. 6. Townsville Clinical School, The Townsville Hospital, 100 Angus Smith Drive, Townsville, QLD, 4818, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The emergency to elective surgery ratio is a proposed indicator for global access to surgical care. There is a well-established link between low socioeconomic status and increased morbidity and mortality. This study examined the emergency to elective surgery ratios for low socioeconomic patients utilising both self-reported unemployment and the neighbourhood Index of Economic Resources (IER). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at a regional tertiary care centre in Australia, including data over a ten-year period (2008-2018). Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for year, age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, rurality, and if surgeries were due to trauma or injuries, was performed. RESULTS: 84,014 patients underwent a surgical procedure in the period examined; 29.0% underwent emergency surgery, 5.31% were unemployed, and 26.6% lived in neighbourhoods with the lowest IER. Following multivariable testing, the rate of emergency surgery was higher for unemployed patients (OR 1.42 [1.32-1.52], p < 0.001), and for those from the lowest IER (OR 1.13 [1.08-1.19], p < 0.001). For unemployed patients, this disparity increased during the study period (OR 1.32 [2008-2012], OR 1.48 [2013-2018]). When stratified by specialty, most (7/11) had significant disparities for unemployed patients: Cardiac/Cardiothoracic, Otolaryngology, Maxillofacial/Dental, Obstetrics/Gynaecology, Orthopaedics, Plastics, and Vascular surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Unemployed Australians and those residing in the most disadvantaged IER neighbourhoods had higher emergency to elective surgery rates. The disparity in emergency to elective surgery rates for unemployed patients was found in most surgical specialties and increased over the period examined. This suggests a widespread and potentially increasing disparity in access to surgical care for patients of socioeconomic disadvantage, specifically for those who are unemployed.
BACKGROUND: The emergency to elective surgery ratio is a proposed indicator for global access to surgical care. There is a well-established link between low socioeconomic status and increased morbidity and mortality. This study examined the emergency to elective surgery ratios for low socioeconomic patients utilising both self-reported unemployment and the neighbourhood Index of Economic Resources (IER). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at a regional tertiary care centre in Australia, including data over a ten-year period (2008-2018). Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for year, age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, rurality, and if surgeries were due to trauma or injuries, was performed. RESULTS: 84,014 patients underwent a surgical procedure in the period examined; 29.0% underwent emergency surgery, 5.31% were unemployed, and 26.6% lived in neighbourhoods with the lowest IER. Following multivariable testing, the rate of emergency surgery was higher for unemployed patients (OR 1.42 [1.32-1.52], p < 0.001), and for those from the lowest IER (OR 1.13 [1.08-1.19], p < 0.001). For unemployed patients, this disparity increased during the study period (OR 1.32 [2008-2012], OR 1.48 [2013-2018]). When stratified by specialty, most (7/11) had significant disparities for unemployed patients: Cardiac/Cardiothoracic, Otolaryngology, Maxillofacial/Dental, Obstetrics/Gynaecology, Orthopaedics, Plastics, and Vascular surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Unemployed Australians and those residing in the most disadvantaged IER neighbourhoods had higher emergency to elective surgery rates. The disparity in emergency to elective surgery rates for unemployed patients was found in most surgical specialties and increased over the period examined. This suggests a widespread and potentially increasing disparity in access to surgical care for patients of socioeconomic disadvantage, specifically for those who are unemployed.
Authors: Dean J Arnaoutakis; Brandon W Propper; James H Black; Eric B Schneider; Ying Wei Lum; Julie A Freischlag; Bruce A Perler; Christopher J Abularrage Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Laurent G Glance; Stewart J Lustik; Edward L Hannan; Turner M Osler; Dana B Mukamel; Feng Qian; Andrew W Dick Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Jonathan C Samuel; Anna F Tyson; Charles Mabedi; Gift Mulima; Bruce A Cairns; Carlos Varela; Anthony G Charles Journal: Int J Surg Date: 2014-07-29 Impact factor: 6.071